Answered

Discover a wealth of knowledge at Westonci.ca, where experts provide answers to your most pressing questions. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.

Select the correct answer.
What argument does the author anticipate and refute in this excerpt from the Declaration of Independence?
Nor have we been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have wamed them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend
an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to
their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would
inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity.
OA. If the American colonists are unhappy with the king, they should appeal to Parliament.
O
B. Most British Parliament members sympathize with the plight of the American colonies.
O C. The American colonies are well represented in the British Parliament and have no right to blame the king.
O
D. The allegations against the king made by the colonists are without proof and unjustified.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

The excerpt from the Declaration of Independence addresses the refusal of British authorities to address the grievances of the American colonies, leading to the necessity of separation.


Explanation:

The author anticipates and refutes the argument that: If the American colonists are unhappy with the king, they should appeal to Parliament. The excerpt from the Declaration of Independence emphasizes that despite repeated efforts to address grievances with their British brethren and appeal to their sense of justice, the colonists were left with no choice but to separate.

One argument anticipated and refuted by the author: The American colonies are well represented in the British Parliament and have no right to blame the king. This is refuted by highlighting the lack of response and understanding from the British authorities despite the colonies’ attempts to seek justice and maintain connections.

The necessity for separation: The excerpt underscores the inevitability of separation due to the British brethren being unresponsive to appeals and continuing to act against the interests of the American colonies.


Learn more about Declaration of Independence here:

https://brainly.com/question/36064786


Thanks for stopping by. We are committed to providing the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.