Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, where your questions are met with accurate answers from a community of experts and enthusiasts. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing precise answers to your questions in different areas. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.

As you examine a vehicle that the claimant
says has been damaged by hail, which of the
following physical evidence might suggest
fraud?
1
O
There is damage on most exposed areas of the
vehicle
Paint is removed at the point of the dent
The windshield is broken
One of the mirrors is shattered

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Detecting fraud in auto damage claims involves looking for specific physical evidence like paint removal at the dent.


Explanation:

Fraud in auto damage claims can be detected by examining physical evidence. For instance, if paint is removed at the point of the dent, it might suggest fraudulent activity as it could be an attempt to exaggerate the damage. On the other hand, damage on most exposed areas of the vehicle is more typical of genuine hail damage. Therefore, the presence of paint removal at the dent and damage on exposed areas together might point towards potential fraud.


Learn more about Detecting fraud in auto damage claims here:

https://brainly.com/question/40993825


Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.