Welcome to Westonci.ca, where curiosity meets expertise. Ask any question and receive fast, accurate answers from our knowledgeable community. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a knowledgeable community of professionals on our platform. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.

Consider the function [tex]\( f(x) = 2x - \frac{1}{2} \)[/tex] and its inverse [tex]\( f^{-1}(x) = \frac{1}{2}x + \frac{1}{4} \)[/tex].

Which statement describes how the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-intercept for the original function can be determined?

A. The [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-intercept for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is the constant in the [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] equation.

B. The [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-intercept for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is the constant in the [tex]\( f^{-1}(x) \)[/tex] equation.

C. The [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-intercept for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is the reciprocal of the constant in the [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] equation.

D. The [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-intercept for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is the reciprocal of the constant in the [tex]\( f^{-1}(x) \)[/tex] equation.

Sagot :

To determine the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-intercept of the original function [tex]\( f(x) = 2x - \frac{1}{2} \)[/tex], we follow these steps:

1. Understand the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-intercept: The [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-intercept is the value of [tex]\( x \)[/tex] where the function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] equals zero. This means we need to solve the equation [tex]\( f(x) = 0 \)[/tex].

2. Set the function equal to zero:
[tex]\[ f(x) = 2x - \frac{1}{2} = 0 \][/tex]

3. Solve for [tex]\( x \)[/tex]:
- First, isolate [tex]\( x \)[/tex] by adding [tex]\( \frac{1}{2} \)[/tex] to both sides of the equation:
[tex]\[ 2x - \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2} = 0 + \frac{1}{2} \][/tex]
which simplifies to:
[tex]\[ 2x = \frac{1}{2} \][/tex]
- Next, divide both sides by 2:
[tex]\[ x = \frac{\frac{1}{2}}{2} = \frac{1}{4} \][/tex]

Thus, the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-intercept for [tex]\( f(x) = 2x - \frac{1}{2} \)[/tex] is [tex]\( \frac{1}{4} \)[/tex].

Comparison with the given statements:

- The [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-intercept is NOT the constant in the [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] equation, since the constant in [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is [tex]\(-\frac{1}{2}\)[/tex].
- The [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-intercept is NOT the constant in the [tex]\( f^{-1}(x) \)[/tex] equation, as the constant in [tex]\( f^{-1}(x) \)[/tex] is [tex]\( \frac{1}{4} \)[/tex].
- The correct statement is:
[tex]\[ \text{The } x\text{-intercept for } f(x) \text{ is the reciprocal of the constant in the } f(x) \text{ equation.} \][/tex]
since [tex]\((2)^{-1} = \frac{1}{2}\)[/tex]. However, we need to solve for [tex]\( x \)[/tex] by dividing by 2, leading to [tex]\( \frac{1}{4} \)[/tex].

So the correct statement is: The x-intercept for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is the reciprocal of the constant in the [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] equation divided by 2.
Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.