Welcome to Westonci.ca, where you can find answers to all your questions from a community of experienced professionals. Explore our Q&A platform to find in-depth answers from a wide range of experts in different fields. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.
Sagot :
To determine which function represents [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] given that it has a [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of [tex]\(-2\)[/tex], let’s analyze each of the provided functions step-by-step.
### Step 1: Understanding the Y-Intercept
The [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of a function is the value of the function when [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]. Therefore, we need to check what [tex]\( g(0) \)[/tex] is for each given option.
### Step 2: Analyzing Each Transformation
#### Option A: [tex]\( g(x) = f(x+2) \)[/tex]
For [tex]\( g(x) = f(x+2) \)[/tex], when we substitute [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ g(0) = f(0+2) = f(2) \][/tex]
This transformation shifts the function horizontally but does not affect the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of the original function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] directly. Hence, the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept remains whatever it was for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex], not necessarily [tex]\(-2\)[/tex].
#### Option B: [tex]\( g(x) = f(x) - 5 \)[/tex]
For [tex]\( g(x) = f(x) - 5 \)[/tex], when we substitute [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ g(0) = f(0) - 5 \][/tex]
This transformation shifts the entire function vertically down by 5 units. If the original [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is [tex]\( y_0 \)[/tex], then the new [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept will be [tex]\( y_0 - 5 \)[/tex]. This does not guarantee a [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of [tex]\(-2\)[/tex] unless [tex]\( y_0 \)[/tex] was [tex]\(3\)[/tex].
#### Option C: [tex]\( g(x) = f(x-5) \)[/tex]
For [tex]\( g(x) = f(x-5) \)[/tex], when we substitute [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ g(0) = f(0-5) = f(-5) \][/tex]
This transformation shifts the function horizontally but does not affect the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of the original function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] directly. Hence, the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept remains whatever it was for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex], not necessarily [tex]\(-2\)[/tex].
#### Option D: [tex]\( g(x) = f(x) - 2 \)[/tex]
For [tex]\( g(x) = f(x) - 2 \)[/tex], when we substitute [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ g(0) = f(0) - 2 \][/tex]
This transformation shifts the entire function vertically down by 2 units. If the original [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is [tex]\( y_0 \)[/tex], then the new [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept will be [tex]\( y_0 - 2 \)[/tex]. Therefore, if the original [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] was [tex]\( 0 \)[/tex], the new [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept becomes [tex]\( -2 \)[/tex], which matches the given condition.
### Conclusion
The only transformation that results in a [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of [tex]\(-2\)[/tex] is option D:
[tex]\[ \boxed{g(x) = f(x) - 2} \][/tex]
### Step 1: Understanding the Y-Intercept
The [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of a function is the value of the function when [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]. Therefore, we need to check what [tex]\( g(0) \)[/tex] is for each given option.
### Step 2: Analyzing Each Transformation
#### Option A: [tex]\( g(x) = f(x+2) \)[/tex]
For [tex]\( g(x) = f(x+2) \)[/tex], when we substitute [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ g(0) = f(0+2) = f(2) \][/tex]
This transformation shifts the function horizontally but does not affect the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of the original function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] directly. Hence, the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept remains whatever it was for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex], not necessarily [tex]\(-2\)[/tex].
#### Option B: [tex]\( g(x) = f(x) - 5 \)[/tex]
For [tex]\( g(x) = f(x) - 5 \)[/tex], when we substitute [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ g(0) = f(0) - 5 \][/tex]
This transformation shifts the entire function vertically down by 5 units. If the original [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is [tex]\( y_0 \)[/tex], then the new [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept will be [tex]\( y_0 - 5 \)[/tex]. This does not guarantee a [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of [tex]\(-2\)[/tex] unless [tex]\( y_0 \)[/tex] was [tex]\(3\)[/tex].
#### Option C: [tex]\( g(x) = f(x-5) \)[/tex]
For [tex]\( g(x) = f(x-5) \)[/tex], when we substitute [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ g(0) = f(0-5) = f(-5) \][/tex]
This transformation shifts the function horizontally but does not affect the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of the original function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] directly. Hence, the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept remains whatever it was for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex], not necessarily [tex]\(-2\)[/tex].
#### Option D: [tex]\( g(x) = f(x) - 2 \)[/tex]
For [tex]\( g(x) = f(x) - 2 \)[/tex], when we substitute [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ g(0) = f(0) - 2 \][/tex]
This transformation shifts the entire function vertically down by 2 units. If the original [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is [tex]\( y_0 \)[/tex], then the new [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept will be [tex]\( y_0 - 2 \)[/tex]. Therefore, if the original [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] was [tex]\( 0 \)[/tex], the new [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept becomes [tex]\( -2 \)[/tex], which matches the given condition.
### Conclusion
The only transformation that results in a [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of [tex]\(-2\)[/tex] is option D:
[tex]\[ \boxed{g(x) = f(x) - 2} \][/tex]
We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.
