Explore Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A site where experts provide accurate and helpful answers to all your questions. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a community of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.
Sagot :
To determine which function represents [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] given that it has a [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of [tex]\(-2\)[/tex], let’s analyze each of the provided functions step-by-step.
### Step 1: Understanding the Y-Intercept
The [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of a function is the value of the function when [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]. Therefore, we need to check what [tex]\( g(0) \)[/tex] is for each given option.
### Step 2: Analyzing Each Transformation
#### Option A: [tex]\( g(x) = f(x+2) \)[/tex]
For [tex]\( g(x) = f(x+2) \)[/tex], when we substitute [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ g(0) = f(0+2) = f(2) \][/tex]
This transformation shifts the function horizontally but does not affect the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of the original function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] directly. Hence, the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept remains whatever it was for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex], not necessarily [tex]\(-2\)[/tex].
#### Option B: [tex]\( g(x) = f(x) - 5 \)[/tex]
For [tex]\( g(x) = f(x) - 5 \)[/tex], when we substitute [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ g(0) = f(0) - 5 \][/tex]
This transformation shifts the entire function vertically down by 5 units. If the original [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is [tex]\( y_0 \)[/tex], then the new [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept will be [tex]\( y_0 - 5 \)[/tex]. This does not guarantee a [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of [tex]\(-2\)[/tex] unless [tex]\( y_0 \)[/tex] was [tex]\(3\)[/tex].
#### Option C: [tex]\( g(x) = f(x-5) \)[/tex]
For [tex]\( g(x) = f(x-5) \)[/tex], when we substitute [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ g(0) = f(0-5) = f(-5) \][/tex]
This transformation shifts the function horizontally but does not affect the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of the original function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] directly. Hence, the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept remains whatever it was for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex], not necessarily [tex]\(-2\)[/tex].
#### Option D: [tex]\( g(x) = f(x) - 2 \)[/tex]
For [tex]\( g(x) = f(x) - 2 \)[/tex], when we substitute [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ g(0) = f(0) - 2 \][/tex]
This transformation shifts the entire function vertically down by 2 units. If the original [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is [tex]\( y_0 \)[/tex], then the new [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept will be [tex]\( y_0 - 2 \)[/tex]. Therefore, if the original [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] was [tex]\( 0 \)[/tex], the new [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept becomes [tex]\( -2 \)[/tex], which matches the given condition.
### Conclusion
The only transformation that results in a [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of [tex]\(-2\)[/tex] is option D:
[tex]\[ \boxed{g(x) = f(x) - 2} \][/tex]
### Step 1: Understanding the Y-Intercept
The [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of a function is the value of the function when [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]. Therefore, we need to check what [tex]\( g(0) \)[/tex] is for each given option.
### Step 2: Analyzing Each Transformation
#### Option A: [tex]\( g(x) = f(x+2) \)[/tex]
For [tex]\( g(x) = f(x+2) \)[/tex], when we substitute [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ g(0) = f(0+2) = f(2) \][/tex]
This transformation shifts the function horizontally but does not affect the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of the original function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] directly. Hence, the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept remains whatever it was for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex], not necessarily [tex]\(-2\)[/tex].
#### Option B: [tex]\( g(x) = f(x) - 5 \)[/tex]
For [tex]\( g(x) = f(x) - 5 \)[/tex], when we substitute [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ g(0) = f(0) - 5 \][/tex]
This transformation shifts the entire function vertically down by 5 units. If the original [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is [tex]\( y_0 \)[/tex], then the new [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept will be [tex]\( y_0 - 5 \)[/tex]. This does not guarantee a [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of [tex]\(-2\)[/tex] unless [tex]\( y_0 \)[/tex] was [tex]\(3\)[/tex].
#### Option C: [tex]\( g(x) = f(x-5) \)[/tex]
For [tex]\( g(x) = f(x-5) \)[/tex], when we substitute [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ g(0) = f(0-5) = f(-5) \][/tex]
This transformation shifts the function horizontally but does not affect the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of the original function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] directly. Hence, the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept remains whatever it was for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex], not necessarily [tex]\(-2\)[/tex].
#### Option D: [tex]\( g(x) = f(x) - 2 \)[/tex]
For [tex]\( g(x) = f(x) - 2 \)[/tex], when we substitute [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ g(0) = f(0) - 2 \][/tex]
This transformation shifts the entire function vertically down by 2 units. If the original [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is [tex]\( y_0 \)[/tex], then the new [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept will be [tex]\( y_0 - 2 \)[/tex]. Therefore, if the original [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] was [tex]\( 0 \)[/tex], the new [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept becomes [tex]\( -2 \)[/tex], which matches the given condition.
### Conclusion
The only transformation that results in a [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of [tex]\(-2\)[/tex] is option D:
[tex]\[ \boxed{g(x) = f(x) - 2} \][/tex]
Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We're dedicated to helping you find the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Don't hesitate to return for more.
