Westonci.ca is the premier destination for reliable answers to your questions, brought to you by a community of experts. Ask your questions and receive detailed answers from professionals with extensive experience in various fields. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.
Sagot :
Let's solve this step by step, filling in the missing reasons to complete the proof.
First, let's analyze the information given:
1. [tex]\( RSTU \)[/tex] is a rectangle with vertices [tex]\( K (0,0), S (0, a), T (a, a), \)[/tex] and [tex]\( U (a, 0) \)[/tex].
Reason: given
Next, let's look at the second row of the table:
2. [tex]\( RS = a \)[/tex] units
To determine this, you are using the distances between points [tex]\( R \)[/tex] and [tex]\( S \)[/tex]. This distance can be calculated using the distance formula.
Reason: distance formula
Now, let's move to the third row:
3. [tex]\( ST = a \)[/tex] units
This has already been given with the distance formula as its reason.
Reason: distance formula
Next, look at the fourth row:
4. [tex]\( \overline{KS} \cong \overline{ST} \)[/tex]
This means that the segment [tex]\( \overline{KS} \)[/tex] is congruent to the segment [tex]\( \overline{ST} \)[/tex]. This follows from the definition of congruence since both segments are equal in length, specifically both are [tex]\( a \)[/tex] units.
Reason: definition of congruence
Finally, row five:
5. [tex]\( KSTU \)[/tex] is a square
If two consecutive sides of a rectangle are congruent, then the rectangle must be a square. In this case, because [tex]\( \overline{KS} \)[/tex] is congruent to [tex]\( \overline{ST} \)[/tex], [tex]\( RSTU \)[/tex] meets the criteria for being a square.
Reason: if two consecutive sides of a rectangle are congruent, then it's a square
Putting it all together, the completed table should look like this:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|l|l|} \hline 1. \text{\(RSTU\) is a rectangle with vertices \(K (0,0), S (0, a ), T ( a , a ), \text{ and } U ( a , 0)\).} } & 1. \text{given} \\ \hline 2. \text{\(RS = a\) units} & 2. \text{distance formula} \\ \hline 3. \text{\(ST = a\) units} & 3. \text{distance formula} \\ \hline 4. \text{\(\overline{KS} \cong \overline{ST}\)} & 4. \text{definition of congruence} \\ \hline 5. \text{\(KSTU \text{ is a square}\)} & 5. \text{if two consecutive sides of a rectangle are congruent, then it's a square} \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
Thus, the correct order of reasons that complete the proof is:
C. distance formula; definition of congruence; if two consecutive sides of a rectangle are congruent, then it's a square
First, let's analyze the information given:
1. [tex]\( RSTU \)[/tex] is a rectangle with vertices [tex]\( K (0,0), S (0, a), T (a, a), \)[/tex] and [tex]\( U (a, 0) \)[/tex].
Reason: given
Next, let's look at the second row of the table:
2. [tex]\( RS = a \)[/tex] units
To determine this, you are using the distances between points [tex]\( R \)[/tex] and [tex]\( S \)[/tex]. This distance can be calculated using the distance formula.
Reason: distance formula
Now, let's move to the third row:
3. [tex]\( ST = a \)[/tex] units
This has already been given with the distance formula as its reason.
Reason: distance formula
Next, look at the fourth row:
4. [tex]\( \overline{KS} \cong \overline{ST} \)[/tex]
This means that the segment [tex]\( \overline{KS} \)[/tex] is congruent to the segment [tex]\( \overline{ST} \)[/tex]. This follows from the definition of congruence since both segments are equal in length, specifically both are [tex]\( a \)[/tex] units.
Reason: definition of congruence
Finally, row five:
5. [tex]\( KSTU \)[/tex] is a square
If two consecutive sides of a rectangle are congruent, then the rectangle must be a square. In this case, because [tex]\( \overline{KS} \)[/tex] is congruent to [tex]\( \overline{ST} \)[/tex], [tex]\( RSTU \)[/tex] meets the criteria for being a square.
Reason: if two consecutive sides of a rectangle are congruent, then it's a square
Putting it all together, the completed table should look like this:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|l|l|} \hline 1. \text{\(RSTU\) is a rectangle with vertices \(K (0,0), S (0, a ), T ( a , a ), \text{ and } U ( a , 0)\).} } & 1. \text{given} \\ \hline 2. \text{\(RS = a\) units} & 2. \text{distance formula} \\ \hline 3. \text{\(ST = a\) units} & 3. \text{distance formula} \\ \hline 4. \text{\(\overline{KS} \cong \overline{ST}\)} & 4. \text{definition of congruence} \\ \hline 5. \text{\(KSTU \text{ is a square}\)} & 5. \text{if two consecutive sides of a rectangle are congruent, then it's a square} \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
Thus, the correct order of reasons that complete the proof is:
C. distance formula; definition of congruence; if two consecutive sides of a rectangle are congruent, then it's a square
We hope this information was helpful. Feel free to return anytime for more answers to your questions and concerns. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.
