Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform, offering detailed and reliable answers from a knowledgeable community. Join our platform to get reliable answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Let's solve this step by step, filling in the missing reasons to complete the proof.
First, let's analyze the information given:
1. [tex]\( RSTU \)[/tex] is a rectangle with vertices [tex]\( K (0,0), S (0, a), T (a, a), \)[/tex] and [tex]\( U (a, 0) \)[/tex].
Reason: given
Next, let's look at the second row of the table:
2. [tex]\( RS = a \)[/tex] units
To determine this, you are using the distances between points [tex]\( R \)[/tex] and [tex]\( S \)[/tex]. This distance can be calculated using the distance formula.
Reason: distance formula
Now, let's move to the third row:
3. [tex]\( ST = a \)[/tex] units
This has already been given with the distance formula as its reason.
Reason: distance formula
Next, look at the fourth row:
4. [tex]\( \overline{KS} \cong \overline{ST} \)[/tex]
This means that the segment [tex]\( \overline{KS} \)[/tex] is congruent to the segment [tex]\( \overline{ST} \)[/tex]. This follows from the definition of congruence since both segments are equal in length, specifically both are [tex]\( a \)[/tex] units.
Reason: definition of congruence
Finally, row five:
5. [tex]\( KSTU \)[/tex] is a square
If two consecutive sides of a rectangle are congruent, then the rectangle must be a square. In this case, because [tex]\( \overline{KS} \)[/tex] is congruent to [tex]\( \overline{ST} \)[/tex], [tex]\( RSTU \)[/tex] meets the criteria for being a square.
Reason: if two consecutive sides of a rectangle are congruent, then it's a square
Putting it all together, the completed table should look like this:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|l|l|} \hline 1. \text{\(RSTU\) is a rectangle with vertices \(K (0,0), S (0, a ), T ( a , a ), \text{ and } U ( a , 0)\).} } & 1. \text{given} \\ \hline 2. \text{\(RS = a\) units} & 2. \text{distance formula} \\ \hline 3. \text{\(ST = a\) units} & 3. \text{distance formula} \\ \hline 4. \text{\(\overline{KS} \cong \overline{ST}\)} & 4. \text{definition of congruence} \\ \hline 5. \text{\(KSTU \text{ is a square}\)} & 5. \text{if two consecutive sides of a rectangle are congruent, then it's a square} \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
Thus, the correct order of reasons that complete the proof is:
C. distance formula; definition of congruence; if two consecutive sides of a rectangle are congruent, then it's a square
First, let's analyze the information given:
1. [tex]\( RSTU \)[/tex] is a rectangle with vertices [tex]\( K (0,0), S (0, a), T (a, a), \)[/tex] and [tex]\( U (a, 0) \)[/tex].
Reason: given
Next, let's look at the second row of the table:
2. [tex]\( RS = a \)[/tex] units
To determine this, you are using the distances between points [tex]\( R \)[/tex] and [tex]\( S \)[/tex]. This distance can be calculated using the distance formula.
Reason: distance formula
Now, let's move to the third row:
3. [tex]\( ST = a \)[/tex] units
This has already been given with the distance formula as its reason.
Reason: distance formula
Next, look at the fourth row:
4. [tex]\( \overline{KS} \cong \overline{ST} \)[/tex]
This means that the segment [tex]\( \overline{KS} \)[/tex] is congruent to the segment [tex]\( \overline{ST} \)[/tex]. This follows from the definition of congruence since both segments are equal in length, specifically both are [tex]\( a \)[/tex] units.
Reason: definition of congruence
Finally, row five:
5. [tex]\( KSTU \)[/tex] is a square
If two consecutive sides of a rectangle are congruent, then the rectangle must be a square. In this case, because [tex]\( \overline{KS} \)[/tex] is congruent to [tex]\( \overline{ST} \)[/tex], [tex]\( RSTU \)[/tex] meets the criteria for being a square.
Reason: if two consecutive sides of a rectangle are congruent, then it's a square
Putting it all together, the completed table should look like this:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|l|l|} \hline 1. \text{\(RSTU\) is a rectangle with vertices \(K (0,0), S (0, a ), T ( a , a ), \text{ and } U ( a , 0)\).} } & 1. \text{given} \\ \hline 2. \text{\(RS = a\) units} & 2. \text{distance formula} \\ \hline 3. \text{\(ST = a\) units} & 3. \text{distance formula} \\ \hline 4. \text{\(\overline{KS} \cong \overline{ST}\)} & 4. \text{definition of congruence} \\ \hline 5. \text{\(KSTU \text{ is a square}\)} & 5. \text{if two consecutive sides of a rectangle are congruent, then it's a square} \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
Thus, the correct order of reasons that complete the proof is:
C. distance formula; definition of congruence; if two consecutive sides of a rectangle are congruent, then it's a square
We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.
