Answered

At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the best answers from a community of experienced and knowledgeable individuals. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.

Based on what you have learned, is the idea of "separate but equal" facilities consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment? Use evidence to support your answer.

Which of the following did you include in your answer? Check all that apply:
- The reasoning behind Plessy v. Ferguson
- Words and phrases from the Fourteenth Amendment
- An explanation of the rights of US citizens
- The meaning of "equal protection under the law"
- An explanation of my reasoning

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

In the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson case, the notion of "separate but equal" facilities was challenged and found to be inconsistent with the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.


Explanation:

The idea of "separate but equal" facilities was deemed consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment in the Plessy v. Ferguson case of 1896. Despite the claim of equality, it was established that such segregation was inherently unequal, violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.


Learn more about Separate but Equal Doctrine here:

https://brainly.com/question/38891417


Thank you for visiting our platform. We hope you found the answers you were looking for. Come back anytime you need more information. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.