Answered

Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to a wide range of questions, backed by a knowledgeable community. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.

Based on what you have learned, is the idea of "separate but equal" facilities consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment? Use evidence to support your answer.

Which of the following did you include in your answer? Check all that apply:
- The reasoning behind Plessy v. Ferguson
- Words and phrases from the Fourteenth Amendment
- An explanation of the rights of US citizens
- The meaning of "equal protection under the law"
- An explanation of my reasoning

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

In the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson case, the notion of "separate but equal" facilities was challenged and found to be inconsistent with the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.


Explanation:

The idea of "separate but equal" facilities was deemed consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment in the Plessy v. Ferguson case of 1896. Despite the claim of equality, it was established that such segregation was inherently unequal, violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.


Learn more about Separate but Equal Doctrine here:

https://brainly.com/question/38891417


Thank you for choosing our service. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.