Answered

At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the best answers from a community of experienced and knowledgeable individuals. Connect with a community of experts ready to provide precise solutions to your questions on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

Karen owns a seafood restaurant and orders trout from an online retailer. Each pound of trout costs [tex]$30, and the company charges a $[/tex]2 fee for shipping. If Karen orders 10 or more pounds, the trout costs [tex]$24 per pound, but the shipping fee is $[/tex]6.

Which piecewise function models the cost of [tex]\( x \)[/tex] pounds of trout?

A. [tex]\( f(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{l}24x + 6, \quad 0 \ \textless \ x \leq 10 \\ 30x + 2, \quad x \ \textgreater \ 10\end{array}\right. \)[/tex]

B. [tex]\( f(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{l}24x + 6, \quad 0 \ \textless \ x \ \textless \ 10 \\ 30x + 2, \quad x \geq 10\end{array}\right. \)[/tex]

C. [tex]\( f(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}30x + 2, & 0 \ \textless \ x \ \textless \ 10 \\ 24x + 6, & x \geq 10\end{array}\right. \)[/tex]

D. [tex]\( f(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{l}30x + 2, \quad 0 \ \textless \ x \leq 10 \\ 24x + 6, \quad x \ \textgreater \ 10\end{array}\right. \)[/tex]

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer
To determine the correct piecewise function modeling the cost of [tex]\( x \)[/tex] pounds of trout for Karen, let's analyze the conditions given in the problem and match them with the provided options.

1. For orders between 0 and 10 pounds (excluding exactly 10 pounds):
- The cost is \[tex]$30 per pound. - The shipping fee is \$[/tex]2.
- So, for [tex]\( 0 < x < 10 \)[/tex], the cost function would be [tex]\( 30x + 2 \)[/tex].

2. For orders of 10 or more pounds:
- The cost becomes \[tex]$24 per pound starting at 10 pounds. - The shipping fee changes to \$[/tex]6.
- So, for [tex]\( x \geq 10 \)[/tex], the cost function would be [tex]\( 24x + 6 \)[/tex].

Given these conditions, it's clear that:
- For [tex]\( 0 < x < 10 \)[/tex], the cost is [tex]\( 30x + 2 \)[/tex].
- For [tex]\( x \geq 10 \)[/tex], the cost is [tex]\( 24x + 6 \)[/tex].

Now, we compare these expressions to each given option:

A. [tex]\( f(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{l}24 x+6,\ 010\end{array}\right. \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( 0 < x \leq 10 \)[/tex], it incorrectly assigns the cost as [tex]\( 24x + 6 \)[/tex]. This is incorrect because for [tex]\( 0 < x \leq 10 \)[/tex], the cost should be [tex]\( 30x + 2 \)[/tex].

B. [tex]\( f(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{l}24 x+6,\ 0 - For [tex]\( 0 < x < 10 \)[/tex], it incorrectly assigns the cost as [tex]\( 24x + 6 \)[/tex]. This is incorrect for the same reason as option A.

C. [tex]\( f(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}30 x+2, & 0 - For [tex]\( 0 < x < 10 \)[/tex], the cost is correctly assigned as [tex]\( 30x + 2 \)[/tex].
- For [tex]\( x \geq 10 \)[/tex], the cost is correctly assigned as [tex]\( 24x + 6 \)[/tex]. This matches the conditions exactly.

D. [tex]\( f(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{l}30 x+2,\ 010\end{array}\right. \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( 0 < x \leq 10 \)[/tex], the cost is correctly assigned as [tex]\( 30x + 2 \)[/tex] but includes the condition [tex]\( x = 10 \)[/tex]. This is incorrect because at exactly 10 pounds, the cost changes based on the new pricing and shipping fees.

Thus, the piecewise function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] that correctly models the cost of [tex]\( x \)[/tex] pounds of trout for Karen is:

C. [tex]\( f(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}30 x+2, & 0
We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Find reliable answers at Westonci.ca. Visit us again for the latest updates and expert advice.