Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to all your questions. Ask, explore, and learn with our expert community. Get immediate and reliable answers to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.
Sagot :
To determine the correct piecewise function modeling the cost of [tex]\( x \)[/tex] pounds of trout for Karen, let's analyze the conditions given in the problem and match them with the provided options.
1. For orders between 0 and 10 pounds (excluding exactly 10 pounds):
- The cost is \[tex]$30 per pound. - The shipping fee is \$[/tex]2.
- So, for [tex]\( 0 < x < 10 \)[/tex], the cost function would be [tex]\( 30x + 2 \)[/tex].
2. For orders of 10 or more pounds:
- The cost becomes \[tex]$24 per pound starting at 10 pounds. - The shipping fee changes to \$[/tex]6.
- So, for [tex]\( x \geq 10 \)[/tex], the cost function would be [tex]\( 24x + 6 \)[/tex].
Given these conditions, it's clear that:
- For [tex]\( 0 < x < 10 \)[/tex], the cost is [tex]\( 30x + 2 \)[/tex].
- For [tex]\( x \geq 10 \)[/tex], the cost is [tex]\( 24x + 6 \)[/tex].
Now, we compare these expressions to each given option:
A. [tex]\( f(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{l}24 x+6,\ 010\end{array}\right. \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( 0 < x \leq 10 \)[/tex], it incorrectly assigns the cost as [tex]\( 24x + 6 \)[/tex]. This is incorrect because for [tex]\( 0 < x \leq 10 \)[/tex], the cost should be [tex]\( 30x + 2 \)[/tex].
B. [tex]\( f(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{l}24 x+6,\ 0 - For [tex]\( 0 < x < 10 \)[/tex], it incorrectly assigns the cost as [tex]\( 24x + 6 \)[/tex]. This is incorrect for the same reason as option A.
C. [tex]\( f(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}30 x+2, & 0 - For [tex]\( 0 < x < 10 \)[/tex], the cost is correctly assigned as [tex]\( 30x + 2 \)[/tex].
- For [tex]\( x \geq 10 \)[/tex], the cost is correctly assigned as [tex]\( 24x + 6 \)[/tex]. This matches the conditions exactly.
D. [tex]\( f(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{l}30 x+2,\ 010\end{array}\right. \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( 0 < x \leq 10 \)[/tex], the cost is correctly assigned as [tex]\( 30x + 2 \)[/tex] but includes the condition [tex]\( x = 10 \)[/tex]. This is incorrect because at exactly 10 pounds, the cost changes based on the new pricing and shipping fees.
Thus, the piecewise function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] that correctly models the cost of [tex]\( x \)[/tex] pounds of trout for Karen is:
C. [tex]\( f(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}30 x+2, & 0
1. For orders between 0 and 10 pounds (excluding exactly 10 pounds):
- The cost is \[tex]$30 per pound. - The shipping fee is \$[/tex]2.
- So, for [tex]\( 0 < x < 10 \)[/tex], the cost function would be [tex]\( 30x + 2 \)[/tex].
2. For orders of 10 or more pounds:
- The cost becomes \[tex]$24 per pound starting at 10 pounds. - The shipping fee changes to \$[/tex]6.
- So, for [tex]\( x \geq 10 \)[/tex], the cost function would be [tex]\( 24x + 6 \)[/tex].
Given these conditions, it's clear that:
- For [tex]\( 0 < x < 10 \)[/tex], the cost is [tex]\( 30x + 2 \)[/tex].
- For [tex]\( x \geq 10 \)[/tex], the cost is [tex]\( 24x + 6 \)[/tex].
Now, we compare these expressions to each given option:
A. [tex]\( f(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{l}24 x+6,\ 010\end{array}\right. \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( 0 < x \leq 10 \)[/tex], it incorrectly assigns the cost as [tex]\( 24x + 6 \)[/tex]. This is incorrect because for [tex]\( 0 < x \leq 10 \)[/tex], the cost should be [tex]\( 30x + 2 \)[/tex].
B. [tex]\( f(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{l}24 x+6,\ 0 - For [tex]\( 0 < x < 10 \)[/tex], it incorrectly assigns the cost as [tex]\( 24x + 6 \)[/tex]. This is incorrect for the same reason as option A.
C. [tex]\( f(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}30 x+2, & 0 - For [tex]\( 0 < x < 10 \)[/tex], the cost is correctly assigned as [tex]\( 30x + 2 \)[/tex].
- For [tex]\( x \geq 10 \)[/tex], the cost is correctly assigned as [tex]\( 24x + 6 \)[/tex]. This matches the conditions exactly.
D. [tex]\( f(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{l}30 x+2,\ 010\end{array}\right. \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( 0 < x \leq 10 \)[/tex], the cost is correctly assigned as [tex]\( 30x + 2 \)[/tex] but includes the condition [tex]\( x = 10 \)[/tex]. This is incorrect because at exactly 10 pounds, the cost changes based on the new pricing and shipping fees.
Thus, the piecewise function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] that correctly models the cost of [tex]\( x \)[/tex] pounds of trout for Karen is:
C. [tex]\( f(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}30 x+2, & 0
We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.