At Westonci.ca, we make it easy for you to get the answers you need from a community of knowledgeable individuals. Explore in-depth answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts across different fields. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.
Sagot :
Let's go through the problem step-by-step:
### Step 1: Calculate the Residuals
The residuals are calculated by subtracting the predicted values from the given values. Here are the values provided in the table:
- For [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex]:
- Given: -2.7
- Predicted: -2.84
- Residual: [tex]\( -2.7 - (-2.84) = -2.7 + 2.84 = 0.14 \)[/tex] (approximately 0.13999999999999968)
- For [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex]:
- Given: -0.9
- Predicted: -0.81
- Residual: [tex]\( -0.9 - (-0.81) = -0.9 + 0.81 = -0.09 \)[/tex] (approximately -0.08999999999999997)
- For [tex]\( x = 3 \)[/tex]:
- Given: 1.1
- Predicted: 1.22
- Residual: [tex]\( 1.1 - 1.22 = -0.12 \)[/tex] (approximately -0.11999999999999988)
- For [tex]\( x = 4 \)[/tex]:
- Given: 3.2
- Predicted: 3.25
- Residual: [tex]\( 3.2 - 3.25 = -0.05 \)[/tex] (approximately -0.04999999999999982)
- For [tex]\( x = 5 \)[/tex]:
- Given: 5.4
- Predicted: 5.28
- Residual: [tex]\( 5.4 - 5.28 = 0.12 \)[/tex] (approximately 0.1200000000000001)
Updating the table with these residuals:
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|} \hline $x$ & Given & Predicted & Residual \\ \hline 1 & -2.7 & -2.84 & 0.13999999999999968 \\ \hline 2 & -0.9 & -0.81 & -0.08999999999999997 \\ \hline 3 & 1.1 & 1.22 & -0.11999999999999988 \\ \hline 4 & 3.2 & 3.25 & -0.04999999999999982 \\ \hline 5 & 5.4 & 5.28 & 0.1200000000000001 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
### Step 2: Plot the Residuals
Next, we plot these residuals on a graph with [tex]\( x \)[/tex] on the x-axis and the residuals on the y-axis. The points to plot are:
- (1, 0.14)
- (2, -0.09)
- (3, -0.12)
- (4, -0.05)
- (5, 0.12)
### Step 3: Analyze the Residual Plot
The important aspect of analyzing a residual plot is to determine if there is any discernible pattern:
- If the points display no obvious pattern and are scattered randomly around the x-axis, it implies that the line of best fit is appropriate.
- If there is a clear pattern, such as a curve or a systematic arrangement, it suggests that the line of best fit may not be the best model for the data.
Given our residuals:
[tex]\[ [0.13999999999999968, -0.08999999999999997, -0.11999999999999988, -0.04999999999999982, 0.1200000000000001] \][/tex]
### Conclusion
On evaluating these points, they are scattered randomly around the x-axis without showing a specific pattern.
Thus, for the given problem, the correct choice is:
Yes, the points have no pattern.
This indicates that the line of best fit is appropriate for the data provided.
### Step 1: Calculate the Residuals
The residuals are calculated by subtracting the predicted values from the given values. Here are the values provided in the table:
- For [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex]:
- Given: -2.7
- Predicted: -2.84
- Residual: [tex]\( -2.7 - (-2.84) = -2.7 + 2.84 = 0.14 \)[/tex] (approximately 0.13999999999999968)
- For [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex]:
- Given: -0.9
- Predicted: -0.81
- Residual: [tex]\( -0.9 - (-0.81) = -0.9 + 0.81 = -0.09 \)[/tex] (approximately -0.08999999999999997)
- For [tex]\( x = 3 \)[/tex]:
- Given: 1.1
- Predicted: 1.22
- Residual: [tex]\( 1.1 - 1.22 = -0.12 \)[/tex] (approximately -0.11999999999999988)
- For [tex]\( x = 4 \)[/tex]:
- Given: 3.2
- Predicted: 3.25
- Residual: [tex]\( 3.2 - 3.25 = -0.05 \)[/tex] (approximately -0.04999999999999982)
- For [tex]\( x = 5 \)[/tex]:
- Given: 5.4
- Predicted: 5.28
- Residual: [tex]\( 5.4 - 5.28 = 0.12 \)[/tex] (approximately 0.1200000000000001)
Updating the table with these residuals:
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|} \hline $x$ & Given & Predicted & Residual \\ \hline 1 & -2.7 & -2.84 & 0.13999999999999968 \\ \hline 2 & -0.9 & -0.81 & -0.08999999999999997 \\ \hline 3 & 1.1 & 1.22 & -0.11999999999999988 \\ \hline 4 & 3.2 & 3.25 & -0.04999999999999982 \\ \hline 5 & 5.4 & 5.28 & 0.1200000000000001 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
### Step 2: Plot the Residuals
Next, we plot these residuals on a graph with [tex]\( x \)[/tex] on the x-axis and the residuals on the y-axis. The points to plot are:
- (1, 0.14)
- (2, -0.09)
- (3, -0.12)
- (4, -0.05)
- (5, 0.12)
### Step 3: Analyze the Residual Plot
The important aspect of analyzing a residual plot is to determine if there is any discernible pattern:
- If the points display no obvious pattern and are scattered randomly around the x-axis, it implies that the line of best fit is appropriate.
- If there is a clear pattern, such as a curve or a systematic arrangement, it suggests that the line of best fit may not be the best model for the data.
Given our residuals:
[tex]\[ [0.13999999999999968, -0.08999999999999997, -0.11999999999999988, -0.04999999999999982, 0.1200000000000001] \][/tex]
### Conclusion
On evaluating these points, they are scattered randomly around the x-axis without showing a specific pattern.
Thus, for the given problem, the correct choice is:
Yes, the points have no pattern.
This indicates that the line of best fit is appropriate for the data provided.
We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.