Explore Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A site where experts provide accurate and helpful answers to all your questions. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.

Remove plagiarism in this To determine if Simon can claim $1000 from Zect Pte Ltd based on the advertisement, we must apply elements of contract law, namely offer and acceptance, consideration, and intention to create legal relations. An offer is a promise to do or refrain from doing something in exchange for something else, and acceptance is the unqualified agreement to the terms of the offer. Consideration refers to something of value exchanged between the parties (Zhang, 2019). Intention to create legal relations means that both parties must intend for the agreement to be legally binding (Zhang, 2019). Is there an agreement between Arthur and Simon entitling Arthur to a half share of the rights to the song and the net royalties? According to Nielsen v Dysart Timbers Limited, an offer is a proposal of terms that the offeror agrees to be bound by if acceptance is communicated while the offer is still valid. The rule of acceptance, illustrated in Computer Services Pty Ltd v Digital Equipment Corporation, can be deduced from the actions and behavior of the parties involved. The Empirnall Holdings case clarifies implied acceptance, stating that an offeror cannot force a contractual obligation on an offeree by declaring that non-rejection of the offer equals acceptance (Zhang, 2019). Therefore, any agreement between Arthur and Simon must be based on a clear, communicated acceptance of the terms.