At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the best answers from a community of experienced and knowledgeable individuals. Discover precise answers to your questions from a wide range of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.

A "wind farm" was constructed on the open land next to a gas station where a mechanic is employed. The huge windmills generated electrical power and oscillated at low speeds, resulting in very low-frequency but high-amplitude sound waves that caused extreme discomfort in a substantial minority of people. The mechanic is one of the people adversely affected by such sound waves; the vibrations from the windmills give him severe headaches and upset his immune system. If the mechanic brings an action for nuisance against the owners of the wind farm and loses, what is the most likely explanation?
(A) Sound waves are not the kind of physical phenomenon on which liability for nuisance can be based.
(B) The owners of the wind farm cannot generate power without producing the offending sound waves, despite their best efforts to find an alternative technology.
(C) At least six out of 10 people are not affected by low-frequency sound waves.
(D) The mechanic neither owns nor rents the gas station at which he works.


Sagot :

We appreciate your visit. Hopefully, the answers you found were beneficial. Don't hesitate to come back for more information. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.