Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, where finding answers to your questions is made simple by our community of experts. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.

Given:
[tex]\( p \)[/tex]: Angles XYZ and RST are vertical angles.
[tex]\( q \)[/tex]: Angles XYZ and RST are congruent.

Which statement is logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]?

A. If angles XYZ and RST are congruent, then they are vertical angles.
B. If angles XYZ and RST are not vertical angles, then they are not congruent.
C. If angles XYZ and RST are not congruent, then they are not vertical angles.
D. If angles XYZ and RST are vertical angles, then they are not congruent.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer
To determine the statement that is logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex], we need to understand the contrapositive of the implication.

Given:
- [tex]\( p \)[/tex]: Angles XYZ and RST are vertical angles.
- [tex]\( q \)[/tex]: Angles XYZ and RST are congruent.

An implication [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] states "If [tex]\( p \)[/tex], then [tex]\( q \)[/tex]". The contrapositive of this statement is logically equivalent to the original implication, and it is formed by:
- Taking the negation of [tex]\( q \)[/tex],
- Taking the negation of [tex]\( p \)[/tex],
- Reversing the direction of the implication.

Therefore, the contrapositive of [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is [tex]\( \neg q \rightarrow \neg p \)[/tex], which reads "If not [tex]\( q \)[/tex], then not [tex]\( p \)[/tex]".

Let's restate this in terms of our specific p and q:
- [tex]\( \neg q \)[/tex]: Angles XYZ and RST are not congruent.
- [tex]\( \neg p \)[/tex]: Angles XYZ and RST are not vertical angles.

So, the contrapositive statement [tex]\( \neg q \rightarrow \neg p \)[/tex] becomes:
"If angles XYZ and RST are not congruent, then they are not vertical angles."

This statement is logically equivalent to the original statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].

Analyzing the given options:

1. If angles XYZ and RST are congruent, then they are vertical angles. (Incorrect)
2. If angles XYZ and RST are not vertical angles, then they are not congruent. (Incorrect)
3. If angles XYZ and RST are not congruent, then they are not vertical angles. (Correct)
4. If angles XYZ and RST are vertical angles, then they are not congruent. (Incorrect)

Therefore, the statement that is logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is:
"If angles XYZ and RST are not congruent, then they are not vertical angles."
We appreciate your visit. Hopefully, the answers you found were beneficial. Don't hesitate to come back for more information. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.