Answered

Westonci.ca is the best place to get answers to your questions, provided by a community of experienced and knowledgeable experts. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.

Given:
[tex]\( p \)[/tex]: Angles [tex]\( XYZ \)[/tex] and [tex]\( RST \)[/tex] are vertical angles.
[tex]\( q \)[/tex]: Angles [tex]\( XYZ \)[/tex] and [tex]\( RST \)[/tex] are congruent.

Which statement is logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]?

A. If angles [tex]\( XYZ \)[/tex] and [tex]\( RST \)[/tex] are congruent, then they are vertical angles.
B. If angles [tex]\( XYZ \)[/tex] and [tex]\( RST \)[/tex] are not vertical angles, then they are not congruent.
C. If angles [tex]\( XYZ \)[/tex] and [tex]\( RST \)[/tex] are not congruent, then they are not vertical angles.
D. If angles [tex]\( XYZ \)[/tex] and [tex]\( RST \)[/tex] are vertical angles, then they are not congruent.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer
To determine which statement is logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex], we need to consider the contrapositive of the statement. The contrapositive of a conditional statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is [tex]\( \neg q \rightarrow \neg p \)[/tex], and it is logically equivalent to the original statement. Let’s break it down step-by-step.

Given statements:
- [tex]\( p \)[/tex]: Angles [tex]\( XYZ \)[/tex] and [tex]\( RST \)[/tex] are vertical angles.
- [tex]\( q \)[/tex]: Angles [tex]\( XYZ \)[/tex] and [tex]\( RST \)[/tex] are congruent.

The original statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] reads:
"If angles [tex]\( XYZ \)[/tex] and [tex]\( RST \)[/tex] are vertical angles, then angles [tex]\( XYZ \)[/tex] and [tex]\( RST \)[/tex] are congruent."

To find the contrapositive, we negate both [tex]\( q \)[/tex] and [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and switch their order:
- [tex]\( \neg q \)[/tex]: Angles [tex]\( XYZ \)[/tex] and [tex]\( RST \)[/tex] are not congruent.
- [tex]\( \neg p \)[/tex]: Angles [tex]\( XYZ \)[/tex] and [tex]\( RST \)[/tex] are not vertical angles.

The contrapositive [tex]\( \neg q \rightarrow \neg p \)[/tex] reads:
"If angles [tex]\( XYZ \)[/tex] and [tex]\( RST \)[/tex] are not congruent, then angles [tex]\( XYZ \)[/tex] and [tex]\( RST \)[/tex] are not vertical angles."

Let’s compare this to the given answer choices:
1. If angles [tex]\( XYZ \)[/tex] and [tex]\( RST \)[/tex] are congruent, then they are vertical angles.
2. If angles [tex]\( XYZ \)[/tex] and [tex]\( RST \)[/tex] are not vertical angles, then they are not congruent.
3. If angles [tex]\( XYZ \)[/tex] and [tex]\( RST \)[/tex] are not congruent, then they are not vertical angles.
4. If angles [tex]\( XYZ \)[/tex] and [tex]\( RST \)[/tex] are vertical angles, then they are not congruent.

The statement that matches our contrapositive is:
3. If angles [tex]\( XYZ \)[/tex] and [tex]\( RST \)[/tex] are not congruent, then they are not vertical angles.

Therefore, the statement that is logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is:
"If angles [tex]\( XYZ \)[/tex] and [tex]\( RST \)[/tex] are not congruent, then they are not vertical angles."
Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.