Discover answers to your most pressing questions at Westonci.ca, the ultimate Q&A platform that connects you with expert solutions. Join our Q&A platform to get precise answers from experts in diverse fields and enhance your understanding. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.
Sagot :
To determine which statement is logically equivalent to the conditional statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]:
1. Understanding the Conditional Statement:
- A conditional statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] reads as "if [tex]\( p \)[/tex] then [tex]\( q \)[/tex]". This means that whenever [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is true, [tex]\( q \)[/tex] must also be true.
2. Identifying Logically Equivalent Statements:
- To find the logically equivalent statement among the given options, we need to consider the contrapositive, inverse, and converse of [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].
- The contrapositive of [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is [tex]\( \sim q \rightarrow \sim p \)[/tex], which reads as "if [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is not true, then [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is not true". This statement is always logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].
- The inverse of [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is [tex]\( \sim p \rightarrow \sim q \)[/tex]. This states that "if [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is not true, then [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is not true". The inverse is not guaranteed to be logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].
- The converse of [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is [tex]\( q \rightarrow p \)[/tex]. This states that "if [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is true". The converse is not guaranteed to be logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].
3. Choosing the Correct Option:
- From the definitions above, the contrapositive [tex]\( \sim q \rightarrow \sim p \)[/tex] is logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].
Considering the given options:
- [tex]\( \sim p \rightarrow \sim q \)[/tex] (Inverse) - Not equivalent.
- [tex]\( \sim q \rightarrow \sim p \)[/tex] (Contrapositive) - Equivalent.
- [tex]\( q \rightarrow p \)[/tex] (Converse) - Not equivalent.
- [tex]\( p \rightarrow \sim q \)[/tex] - Not equivalent and a different logical meaning.
Thus, the logically equivalent statement to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{\sim q \rightarrow \sim p} \][/tex]
1. Understanding the Conditional Statement:
- A conditional statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] reads as "if [tex]\( p \)[/tex] then [tex]\( q \)[/tex]". This means that whenever [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is true, [tex]\( q \)[/tex] must also be true.
2. Identifying Logically Equivalent Statements:
- To find the logically equivalent statement among the given options, we need to consider the contrapositive, inverse, and converse of [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].
- The contrapositive of [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is [tex]\( \sim q \rightarrow \sim p \)[/tex], which reads as "if [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is not true, then [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is not true". This statement is always logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].
- The inverse of [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is [tex]\( \sim p \rightarrow \sim q \)[/tex]. This states that "if [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is not true, then [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is not true". The inverse is not guaranteed to be logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].
- The converse of [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is [tex]\( q \rightarrow p \)[/tex]. This states that "if [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is true". The converse is not guaranteed to be logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].
3. Choosing the Correct Option:
- From the definitions above, the contrapositive [tex]\( \sim q \rightarrow \sim p \)[/tex] is logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].
Considering the given options:
- [tex]\( \sim p \rightarrow \sim q \)[/tex] (Inverse) - Not equivalent.
- [tex]\( \sim q \rightarrow \sim p \)[/tex] (Contrapositive) - Equivalent.
- [tex]\( q \rightarrow p \)[/tex] (Converse) - Not equivalent.
- [tex]\( p \rightarrow \sim q \)[/tex] - Not equivalent and a different logical meaning.
Thus, the logically equivalent statement to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{\sim q \rightarrow \sim p} \][/tex]
We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.