Answered

Looking for reliable answers? Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform where experts share their knowledge on various topics. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide detailed answers to your questions in various areas. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.

Given a conditional statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex], which statement is logically equivalent?

A. [tex]\( \sim p \rightarrow \sim q \)[/tex]
B. [tex]\( \sim q \rightarrow \sim p \)[/tex]
C. [tex]\( q \rightarrow p \)[/tex]
D. [tex]\( p \rightarrow \sim q \)[/tex]


Sagot :

To determine which statement is logically equivalent to the conditional statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]:

1. Understanding the Conditional Statement:
- A conditional statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] reads as "if [tex]\( p \)[/tex] then [tex]\( q \)[/tex]". This means that whenever [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is true, [tex]\( q \)[/tex] must also be true.

2. Identifying Logically Equivalent Statements:
- To find the logically equivalent statement among the given options, we need to consider the contrapositive, inverse, and converse of [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].

- The contrapositive of [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is [tex]\( \sim q \rightarrow \sim p \)[/tex], which reads as "if [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is not true, then [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is not true". This statement is always logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].

- The inverse of [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is [tex]\( \sim p \rightarrow \sim q \)[/tex]. This states that "if [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is not true, then [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is not true". The inverse is not guaranteed to be logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].

- The converse of [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is [tex]\( q \rightarrow p \)[/tex]. This states that "if [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is true". The converse is not guaranteed to be logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].

3. Choosing the Correct Option:
- From the definitions above, the contrapositive [tex]\( \sim q \rightarrow \sim p \)[/tex] is logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].

Considering the given options:
- [tex]\( \sim p \rightarrow \sim q \)[/tex] (Inverse) - Not equivalent.
- [tex]\( \sim q \rightarrow \sim p \)[/tex] (Contrapositive) - Equivalent.
- [tex]\( q \rightarrow p \)[/tex] (Converse) - Not equivalent.
- [tex]\( p \rightarrow \sim q \)[/tex] - Not equivalent and a different logical meaning.

Thus, the logically equivalent statement to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is:

[tex]\[ \boxed{\sim q \rightarrow \sim p} \][/tex]