Answered

Westonci.ca is your trusted source for accurate answers to all your questions. Join our community and start learning today! Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.

Given:
[tex]\( p: 2x = 16 \)[/tex]
[tex]\( q: 3x - 4 = 20 \)[/tex]

Which is the converse of [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]?

A. If [tex]\( 2x \neq 16 \)[/tex], then [tex]\( 3x - 4 \neq 20 \)[/tex].
B. If [tex]\( 3x - 4 \neq 20 \)[/tex], then [tex]\( 2x \neq 16 \)[/tex].
C. If [tex]\( 2x = 16 \)[/tex], then [tex]\( 3x - 4 = 20 \)[/tex].
D. If [tex]\( 3x - 4 = 20 \)[/tex], then [tex]\( 2x = 16 \)[/tex].

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer
To determine the converse of the implication [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex], we first need to understand what the converse of an implication is.

Given:
- [tex]\( p \)[/tex]: [tex]\(2x = 16\)[/tex]
- [tex]\( q \)[/tex]: [tex]\(3x - 4 = 20\)[/tex]

When we have an implication [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex], it reads "If [tex]\( p \)[/tex], then [tex]\( q \)[/tex]." The converse of this implication is obtained by reversing the direction of the implication, i.e., "If [tex]\( q \)[/tex], then [tex]\( p \)[/tex]."

So, given the original implication:
- [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]: "If [tex]\(2x = 16\)[/tex], then [tex]\(3x - 4 = 20\)[/tex]"

The converse of this implication will be:
- [tex]\( q \rightarrow p \)[/tex]: "If [tex]\(3x - 4 = 20\)[/tex], then [tex]\(2x = 16\)[/tex]"

Thus, the correct answer is:
"If [tex]\( 3x - 4 = 20 \)[/tex], then [tex]\( 2x = 16 \)[/tex]."
Thanks for using our platform. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Westonci.ca is committed to providing accurate answers. Come back soon for more trustworthy information.