At Westonci.ca, we connect you with experts who provide detailed answers to your most pressing questions. Start exploring now! Get quick and reliable answers to your questions from a dedicated community of professionals on our platform. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Let's analyze and solve the problem step-by-step based on the provided data and results.
### 1. Identifying Anomalous Results
We have the following data for the solar panels:
- Panel A:
- Area: [tex]\(10 \, \text{cm}^2\)[/tex]
- Potential differences: 2.5, 2.4, 2.6
- Mean: 2.5
- Panel B:
- Area: [tex]\(20 \, \text{cm}^2\)[/tex]
- Potential differences: 5.0, 5.0, 4.9
- Mean: 5.0
- Panel C:
- Area: [tex]\(30 \, \text{cm}^2\)[/tex]
- Potential differences: 7.5, 9.99, 12.4, 12.9, 12.5, 0.2, 0.5, 10
- Mean: 8.25 (approximately)
- Panel D:
- Area: [tex]\(40 \, \text{cm}^2\)[/tex]
- Potential differences: 12.5, 12.5
- Mean: 12.5
Reviewing the data:
- Panel A results are consistent.
- Panel B results are consistent.
- Panel D results, although incomplete, are consistent.
Panel C, however, shows a wide range of potential differences from 0.2 to 12.9 volts, which indicates significant variance and inconsistency in the values. This variability suggests that it has anomalous results.
### Conclusion:
- The readings for Panel C show anomalous results.
- Therefore, the correct tick box for anomalous results is Panel C.
### 2. Determining the Most Likely Mean Output Potential Difference for Panel D
To find the most likely mean output potential difference for a solar panel with an area of [tex]\(40 \, \text{cm}^2\)[/tex], we can observe the given results. We know:
- The mean output potential difference for Panel B (20 [tex]\( \text{cm}^2 \)[/tex]) is 5.0 volts.
- Doubling the area (to 40 [tex]\( \text{cm}^2 \)[/tex]) typically doubles the potential difference (if we consider the pattern observed in the data).
Following this reasoning, we would expect the mean output potential difference for Panel D (40 [tex]\( \text{cm}^2 \)[/tex]) to be double that of Panel B.
Thus, the calculated mean from the data is:
[tex]\[ \text{Mean Output Potential Difference for Panel D} = 2 \times \text{Mean Output Potential Difference for Panel B} = 2 \times 5.0 = 10.0 \text{ volts} \][/tex]
### Conclusion:
- The mean output potential difference for a 40 [tex]\( \text{cm}^2 \)[/tex] solar panel is approximately [tex]\(10.0 \)[/tex] volts.
By analyzing the given data appropriately, we have concluded the anomalous results and determined the mean potential difference for the larger solar panel.
### 1. Identifying Anomalous Results
We have the following data for the solar panels:
- Panel A:
- Area: [tex]\(10 \, \text{cm}^2\)[/tex]
- Potential differences: 2.5, 2.4, 2.6
- Mean: 2.5
- Panel B:
- Area: [tex]\(20 \, \text{cm}^2\)[/tex]
- Potential differences: 5.0, 5.0, 4.9
- Mean: 5.0
- Panel C:
- Area: [tex]\(30 \, \text{cm}^2\)[/tex]
- Potential differences: 7.5, 9.99, 12.4, 12.9, 12.5, 0.2, 0.5, 10
- Mean: 8.25 (approximately)
- Panel D:
- Area: [tex]\(40 \, \text{cm}^2\)[/tex]
- Potential differences: 12.5, 12.5
- Mean: 12.5
Reviewing the data:
- Panel A results are consistent.
- Panel B results are consistent.
- Panel D results, although incomplete, are consistent.
Panel C, however, shows a wide range of potential differences from 0.2 to 12.9 volts, which indicates significant variance and inconsistency in the values. This variability suggests that it has anomalous results.
### Conclusion:
- The readings for Panel C show anomalous results.
- Therefore, the correct tick box for anomalous results is Panel C.
### 2. Determining the Most Likely Mean Output Potential Difference for Panel D
To find the most likely mean output potential difference for a solar panel with an area of [tex]\(40 \, \text{cm}^2\)[/tex], we can observe the given results. We know:
- The mean output potential difference for Panel B (20 [tex]\( \text{cm}^2 \)[/tex]) is 5.0 volts.
- Doubling the area (to 40 [tex]\( \text{cm}^2 \)[/tex]) typically doubles the potential difference (if we consider the pattern observed in the data).
Following this reasoning, we would expect the mean output potential difference for Panel D (40 [tex]\( \text{cm}^2 \)[/tex]) to be double that of Panel B.
Thus, the calculated mean from the data is:
[tex]\[ \text{Mean Output Potential Difference for Panel D} = 2 \times \text{Mean Output Potential Difference for Panel B} = 2 \times 5.0 = 10.0 \text{ volts} \][/tex]
### Conclusion:
- The mean output potential difference for a 40 [tex]\( \text{cm}^2 \)[/tex] solar panel is approximately [tex]\(10.0 \)[/tex] volts.
By analyzing the given data appropriately, we have concluded the anomalous results and determined the mean potential difference for the larger solar panel.
Thank you for visiting our platform. We hope you found the answers you were looking for. Come back anytime you need more information. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.
