At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the best answers from a community of experienced and knowledgeable individuals. Our Q&A platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from experts in various disciplines. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.
Sagot :
To determine how Jacob can modify his budget to help him make the \[tex]$600 monthly rental payment, we need to consider the feasibility of each option mentioned in the problem.
### Step-by-Step Analysis:
1. Initial Expenses Breakdown:
- Wages: \$[/tex]1680
- Expenses (other than rent): \[tex]$200 - Rent (initial): \$[/tex]75
- Food: \[tex]$700 - Clothes: \$[/tex]400
- Savings: \[tex]$300 - Recreation: \$[/tex]5
2. Total Current Expenses Calculation:
Total Current Expenses = \[tex]$200 + \$[/tex]75 + \[tex]$700 + \$[/tex]400 + \[tex]$300 + \$[/tex]5 = \[tex]$1680 Jacob's total current expenses add up to his total wages, so he has no surplus or deficit. 3. New Rent Requirement: - New Rent: \$[/tex]600
4. Required Adjustment/Increase in Rent Payment:
Required Rent Increase = New Rent - Initial Rent = \[tex]$600 - \$[/tex]75 = \[tex]$525 5. Evaluation of Each Option: Option a: Spend less on food and clothes to make the \$[/tex]600 monthly rental payment.
- Savings by reducing food and clothes: \[tex]$700 (food) + \$[/tex]400 (clothes) = \[tex]$1100 - After accounting for the required rent increase, is this sufficient? - Adjustment needed: \$[/tex]1100 - \[tex]$525 = \$[/tex]575
- This means [tex]\( \$575 \geq 0 \)[/tex], so it is indeed feasible.
Option b: Spend less on recreation and reduce savings to make the \[tex]$600 monthly rental payment. - Savings by reducing recreation and savings: \$[/tex]5 (recreation) + \[tex]$300 (savings) = \$[/tex]305
- After accounting for the required rent increase, is this sufficient?
- Adjustment needed: \[tex]$305 - \$[/tex]525 = -\[tex]$220 - This means \( -\$[/tex]220 < 0 \), so this is not feasible.
Option c: No modifications to his budget would be necessary as long as he takes on a part-time job on the weekends to increase his income.
- Additional income must cover at least the \[tex]$525 rent increase. - Given Jacob can secure part-time work that covers or exceeds this amount, this is feasible. Option d: Spend less on food and recreation to make the \$[/tex]600 monthly rental payment.
- Savings by reducing food and recreation: \[tex]$700 (food) + \$[/tex]5 (recreation) = \[tex]$705 - After accounting for the required rent increase, is this sufficient? - Adjustment needed: \$[/tex]705 - \[tex]$525 = \$[/tex]180
- This means [tex]\( \$180 \geq 0 \)[/tex], so it is indeed feasible.
### Conclusion:
Based on above feasibility check for each option:
- Option a: Feasible
- Option b: Not feasible
- Option c: Feasible (with additional income from part-time job)
- Option d: Feasible
Therefore, the feasible options for Jacob to make the \$600 monthly rental payment are: Option a, Option c, and Option d.
- Expenses (other than rent): \[tex]$200 - Rent (initial): \$[/tex]75
- Food: \[tex]$700 - Clothes: \$[/tex]400
- Savings: \[tex]$300 - Recreation: \$[/tex]5
2. Total Current Expenses Calculation:
Total Current Expenses = \[tex]$200 + \$[/tex]75 + \[tex]$700 + \$[/tex]400 + \[tex]$300 + \$[/tex]5 = \[tex]$1680 Jacob's total current expenses add up to his total wages, so he has no surplus or deficit. 3. New Rent Requirement: - New Rent: \$[/tex]600
4. Required Adjustment/Increase in Rent Payment:
Required Rent Increase = New Rent - Initial Rent = \[tex]$600 - \$[/tex]75 = \[tex]$525 5. Evaluation of Each Option: Option a: Spend less on food and clothes to make the \$[/tex]600 monthly rental payment.
- Savings by reducing food and clothes: \[tex]$700 (food) + \$[/tex]400 (clothes) = \[tex]$1100 - After accounting for the required rent increase, is this sufficient? - Adjustment needed: \$[/tex]1100 - \[tex]$525 = \$[/tex]575
- This means [tex]\( \$575 \geq 0 \)[/tex], so it is indeed feasible.
Option b: Spend less on recreation and reduce savings to make the \[tex]$600 monthly rental payment. - Savings by reducing recreation and savings: \$[/tex]5 (recreation) + \[tex]$300 (savings) = \$[/tex]305
- After accounting for the required rent increase, is this sufficient?
- Adjustment needed: \[tex]$305 - \$[/tex]525 = -\[tex]$220 - This means \( -\$[/tex]220 < 0 \), so this is not feasible.
Option c: No modifications to his budget would be necessary as long as he takes on a part-time job on the weekends to increase his income.
- Additional income must cover at least the \[tex]$525 rent increase. - Given Jacob can secure part-time work that covers or exceeds this amount, this is feasible. Option d: Spend less on food and recreation to make the \$[/tex]600 monthly rental payment.
- Savings by reducing food and recreation: \[tex]$700 (food) + \$[/tex]5 (recreation) = \[tex]$705 - After accounting for the required rent increase, is this sufficient? - Adjustment needed: \$[/tex]705 - \[tex]$525 = \$[/tex]180
- This means [tex]\( \$180 \geq 0 \)[/tex], so it is indeed feasible.
### Conclusion:
Based on above feasibility check for each option:
- Option a: Feasible
- Option b: Not feasible
- Option c: Feasible (with additional income from part-time job)
- Option d: Feasible
Therefore, the feasible options for Jacob to make the \$600 monthly rental payment are: Option a, Option c, and Option d.
Thank you for choosing our service. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.