Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions are answered by a community of knowledgeable contributors. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.
Sagot :
To determine how Jacob can modify his budget to help him make the \[tex]$600 monthly rental payment, we need to consider the feasibility of each option mentioned in the problem.
### Step-by-Step Analysis:
1. Initial Expenses Breakdown:
- Wages: \$[/tex]1680
- Expenses (other than rent): \[tex]$200 - Rent (initial): \$[/tex]75
- Food: \[tex]$700 - Clothes: \$[/tex]400
- Savings: \[tex]$300 - Recreation: \$[/tex]5
2. Total Current Expenses Calculation:
Total Current Expenses = \[tex]$200 + \$[/tex]75 + \[tex]$700 + \$[/tex]400 + \[tex]$300 + \$[/tex]5 = \[tex]$1680 Jacob's total current expenses add up to his total wages, so he has no surplus or deficit. 3. New Rent Requirement: - New Rent: \$[/tex]600
4. Required Adjustment/Increase in Rent Payment:
Required Rent Increase = New Rent - Initial Rent = \[tex]$600 - \$[/tex]75 = \[tex]$525 5. Evaluation of Each Option: Option a: Spend less on food and clothes to make the \$[/tex]600 monthly rental payment.
- Savings by reducing food and clothes: \[tex]$700 (food) + \$[/tex]400 (clothes) = \[tex]$1100 - After accounting for the required rent increase, is this sufficient? - Adjustment needed: \$[/tex]1100 - \[tex]$525 = \$[/tex]575
- This means [tex]\( \$575 \geq 0 \)[/tex], so it is indeed feasible.
Option b: Spend less on recreation and reduce savings to make the \[tex]$600 monthly rental payment. - Savings by reducing recreation and savings: \$[/tex]5 (recreation) + \[tex]$300 (savings) = \$[/tex]305
- After accounting for the required rent increase, is this sufficient?
- Adjustment needed: \[tex]$305 - \$[/tex]525 = -\[tex]$220 - This means \( -\$[/tex]220 < 0 \), so this is not feasible.
Option c: No modifications to his budget would be necessary as long as he takes on a part-time job on the weekends to increase his income.
- Additional income must cover at least the \[tex]$525 rent increase. - Given Jacob can secure part-time work that covers or exceeds this amount, this is feasible. Option d: Spend less on food and recreation to make the \$[/tex]600 monthly rental payment.
- Savings by reducing food and recreation: \[tex]$700 (food) + \$[/tex]5 (recreation) = \[tex]$705 - After accounting for the required rent increase, is this sufficient? - Adjustment needed: \$[/tex]705 - \[tex]$525 = \$[/tex]180
- This means [tex]\( \$180 \geq 0 \)[/tex], so it is indeed feasible.
### Conclusion:
Based on above feasibility check for each option:
- Option a: Feasible
- Option b: Not feasible
- Option c: Feasible (with additional income from part-time job)
- Option d: Feasible
Therefore, the feasible options for Jacob to make the \$600 monthly rental payment are: Option a, Option c, and Option d.
- Expenses (other than rent): \[tex]$200 - Rent (initial): \$[/tex]75
- Food: \[tex]$700 - Clothes: \$[/tex]400
- Savings: \[tex]$300 - Recreation: \$[/tex]5
2. Total Current Expenses Calculation:
Total Current Expenses = \[tex]$200 + \$[/tex]75 + \[tex]$700 + \$[/tex]400 + \[tex]$300 + \$[/tex]5 = \[tex]$1680 Jacob's total current expenses add up to his total wages, so he has no surplus or deficit. 3. New Rent Requirement: - New Rent: \$[/tex]600
4. Required Adjustment/Increase in Rent Payment:
Required Rent Increase = New Rent - Initial Rent = \[tex]$600 - \$[/tex]75 = \[tex]$525 5. Evaluation of Each Option: Option a: Spend less on food and clothes to make the \$[/tex]600 monthly rental payment.
- Savings by reducing food and clothes: \[tex]$700 (food) + \$[/tex]400 (clothes) = \[tex]$1100 - After accounting for the required rent increase, is this sufficient? - Adjustment needed: \$[/tex]1100 - \[tex]$525 = \$[/tex]575
- This means [tex]\( \$575 \geq 0 \)[/tex], so it is indeed feasible.
Option b: Spend less on recreation and reduce savings to make the \[tex]$600 monthly rental payment. - Savings by reducing recreation and savings: \$[/tex]5 (recreation) + \[tex]$300 (savings) = \$[/tex]305
- After accounting for the required rent increase, is this sufficient?
- Adjustment needed: \[tex]$305 - \$[/tex]525 = -\[tex]$220 - This means \( -\$[/tex]220 < 0 \), so this is not feasible.
Option c: No modifications to his budget would be necessary as long as he takes on a part-time job on the weekends to increase his income.
- Additional income must cover at least the \[tex]$525 rent increase. - Given Jacob can secure part-time work that covers or exceeds this amount, this is feasible. Option d: Spend less on food and recreation to make the \$[/tex]600 monthly rental payment.
- Savings by reducing food and recreation: \[tex]$700 (food) + \$[/tex]5 (recreation) = \[tex]$705 - After accounting for the required rent increase, is this sufficient? - Adjustment needed: \$[/tex]705 - \[tex]$525 = \$[/tex]180
- This means [tex]\( \$180 \geq 0 \)[/tex], so it is indeed feasible.
### Conclusion:
Based on above feasibility check for each option:
- Option a: Feasible
- Option b: Not feasible
- Option c: Feasible (with additional income from part-time job)
- Option d: Feasible
Therefore, the feasible options for Jacob to make the \$600 monthly rental payment are: Option a, Option c, and Option d.
We hope our answers were helpful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you may have. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.