Answered

Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to a wide range of questions, backed by a knowledgeable community. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide accurate answers to your questions in various fields. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

How do meta-analyses differ from other types of reviews?

A. They include data only from previously published works.
B. They combine the results only from similar or identical studies.
C. They can be subjective because the author can choose to exclude some works.
D. They are more effective because they combine elements of other types of reviews.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Meta-analyses differ from other reviews by combining data from multiple studies and using statistical methods to provide a single estimate of impact.


Explanation:

Meta-analyses differ from other types of reviews like systematic reviews because they combine data from multiple studies and use statistical methods to summarize them. While systematic reviews aim to identify and evaluate research, meta-analyses go a step further by providing a single estimate of the size of impact through statistical analysis across multiple studies.


Learn more about Meta-analyses here:

https://brainly.com/question/31678384


Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.