At Westonci.ca, we provide clear, reliable answers to all your questions. Join our vibrant community and get the solutions you need. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our Q&A platform. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.
Sagot :
To find the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of a logarithmic function, we need to compute the value of the function when [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]. Let's evaluate each option one by one.
### Option A: [tex]\( f(x) = \log(x + 1) - 1 \)[/tex]
Evaluate at [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(0) = \log(0 + 1) - 1 = \log(1) - 1 \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( \log(1) = 0 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(0) = 0 - 1 = -1 \][/tex]
Thus, this function has a [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept at [tex]\( (0, -1) \)[/tex].
### Option B: [tex]\( f(x) = \log x + 1 \)[/tex]
Evaluate at [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(0) = \log(0) + 1 \][/tex]
The logarithm of zero, [tex]\( \log(0) \)[/tex], is undefined because the logarithm function is only defined for positive real numbers. Hence, this function does not have a [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept.
### Option C: [tex]\( f(x) = \log(x - 1) + 1 \)[/tex]
Evaluate at [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(0) = \log(0 - 1) + 1 = \log(-1) + 1 \][/tex]
The logarithm of a negative number, [tex]\( \log(-1) \)[/tex], is also undefined for real numbers. Therefore, this function does not have a [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept.
### Option D: [tex]\( f(x) = \log(x - 1) - 1 \)[/tex]
Evaluate at [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(0) = \log(0 - 1) - 1 = \log(-1) - 1 \][/tex]
The logarithm of a negative number, [tex]\( \log(-1) \)[/tex], is undefined for real numbers. Thus, this function does not have a [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept.
### Conclusion
After evaluating each option, we see that only option A, [tex]\( f(x) = \log(x + 1) - 1 \)[/tex], has a [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept. The other functions involve logarithms of zero or negative numbers, which are not defined in the real number system.
Therefore, the correct answer is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{A} \][/tex]
### Option A: [tex]\( f(x) = \log(x + 1) - 1 \)[/tex]
Evaluate at [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(0) = \log(0 + 1) - 1 = \log(1) - 1 \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( \log(1) = 0 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(0) = 0 - 1 = -1 \][/tex]
Thus, this function has a [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept at [tex]\( (0, -1) \)[/tex].
### Option B: [tex]\( f(x) = \log x + 1 \)[/tex]
Evaluate at [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(0) = \log(0) + 1 \][/tex]
The logarithm of zero, [tex]\( \log(0) \)[/tex], is undefined because the logarithm function is only defined for positive real numbers. Hence, this function does not have a [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept.
### Option C: [tex]\( f(x) = \log(x - 1) + 1 \)[/tex]
Evaluate at [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(0) = \log(0 - 1) + 1 = \log(-1) + 1 \][/tex]
The logarithm of a negative number, [tex]\( \log(-1) \)[/tex], is also undefined for real numbers. Therefore, this function does not have a [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept.
### Option D: [tex]\( f(x) = \log(x - 1) - 1 \)[/tex]
Evaluate at [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(0) = \log(0 - 1) - 1 = \log(-1) - 1 \][/tex]
The logarithm of a negative number, [tex]\( \log(-1) \)[/tex], is undefined for real numbers. Thus, this function does not have a [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept.
### Conclusion
After evaluating each option, we see that only option A, [tex]\( f(x) = \log(x + 1) - 1 \)[/tex], has a [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept. The other functions involve logarithms of zero or negative numbers, which are not defined in the real number system.
Therefore, the correct answer is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{A} \][/tex]
We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.