Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions find answers from a community of knowledgeable experts. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a knowledgeable community of professionals on our platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.
Sagot :
To solve this problem, let's analyze the given logical implications and determine which statement must be true.
We are given two statements:
1. [tex]\( p \Rightarrow q \)[/tex] (If [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true)
2. [tex]\( q \Rightarrow r \)[/tex] (If [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( r \)[/tex] is true)
We need to evaluate the following options:
A. [tex]\( p \Rightarrow r \)[/tex]
B. [tex]\( s \Rightarrow p \)[/tex]
C. [tex]\( r \Rightarrow p \)[/tex]
D. [tex]\( p \Rightarrow s \)[/tex]
Let's consider each option in detail:
Option A: [tex]\( p \Rightarrow r \)[/tex]
1. Given [tex]\( p \Rightarrow q \)[/tex], if [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( q \)[/tex] must be true.
2. Given [tex]\( q \Rightarrow r \)[/tex], if [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( r \)[/tex] must be true.
From these two statements, we can link [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( r \)[/tex] using a logical transitivity property. If [tex]\( p \)[/tex] implies [tex]\( q \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] implies [tex]\( r \)[/tex], then [tex]\( p \)[/tex] must imply [tex]\( r \)[/tex].
Thus, [tex]\( p \Rightarrow r \)[/tex] is a valid conclusion and must be true.
Option B: [tex]\( s \Rightarrow p \)[/tex]
There is no information given about [tex]\( s \)[/tex] and its relationship to [tex]\( p \)[/tex]. Therefore, we cannot conclude that [tex]\( s \Rightarrow p \)[/tex] must be true.
Option C: [tex]\( r \Rightarrow p \)[/tex]
This option suggests that if [tex]\( r \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is true. However, there is no information given that directly relates [tex]\( r \)[/tex] back to [tex]\( p \)[/tex]. Hence, we cannot conclude that [tex]\( r \Rightarrow p \)[/tex] is true based on the given information.
Option D: [tex]\( p \Rightarrow s \)[/tex]
Similar to Option B, there is no information given about [tex]\( s \)[/tex] in relation to [tex]\( p \)[/tex]. Therefore, we cannot conclude that [tex]\( p \Rightarrow s \)[/tex] must be true.
After evaluating all the options, the statement that must be true given [tex]\( p \Rightarrow q \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \Rightarrow r \)[/tex] is:
A. [tex]\( p \Rightarrow r \)[/tex]
We are given two statements:
1. [tex]\( p \Rightarrow q \)[/tex] (If [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true)
2. [tex]\( q \Rightarrow r \)[/tex] (If [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( r \)[/tex] is true)
We need to evaluate the following options:
A. [tex]\( p \Rightarrow r \)[/tex]
B. [tex]\( s \Rightarrow p \)[/tex]
C. [tex]\( r \Rightarrow p \)[/tex]
D. [tex]\( p \Rightarrow s \)[/tex]
Let's consider each option in detail:
Option A: [tex]\( p \Rightarrow r \)[/tex]
1. Given [tex]\( p \Rightarrow q \)[/tex], if [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( q \)[/tex] must be true.
2. Given [tex]\( q \Rightarrow r \)[/tex], if [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( r \)[/tex] must be true.
From these two statements, we can link [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( r \)[/tex] using a logical transitivity property. If [tex]\( p \)[/tex] implies [tex]\( q \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] implies [tex]\( r \)[/tex], then [tex]\( p \)[/tex] must imply [tex]\( r \)[/tex].
Thus, [tex]\( p \Rightarrow r \)[/tex] is a valid conclusion and must be true.
Option B: [tex]\( s \Rightarrow p \)[/tex]
There is no information given about [tex]\( s \)[/tex] and its relationship to [tex]\( p \)[/tex]. Therefore, we cannot conclude that [tex]\( s \Rightarrow p \)[/tex] must be true.
Option C: [tex]\( r \Rightarrow p \)[/tex]
This option suggests that if [tex]\( r \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is true. However, there is no information given that directly relates [tex]\( r \)[/tex] back to [tex]\( p \)[/tex]. Hence, we cannot conclude that [tex]\( r \Rightarrow p \)[/tex] is true based on the given information.
Option D: [tex]\( p \Rightarrow s \)[/tex]
Similar to Option B, there is no information given about [tex]\( s \)[/tex] in relation to [tex]\( p \)[/tex]. Therefore, we cannot conclude that [tex]\( p \Rightarrow s \)[/tex] must be true.
After evaluating all the options, the statement that must be true given [tex]\( p \Rightarrow q \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \Rightarrow r \)[/tex] is:
A. [tex]\( p \Rightarrow r \)[/tex]
Thank you for your visit. We are dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca. Stay informed by coming back for more detailed answers.