Find the best solutions to your questions at Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Get immediate and reliable answers to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.
Sagot :
To solve this problem, let's analyze the given logical implications and determine which statement must be true.
We are given two statements:
1. [tex]\( p \Rightarrow q \)[/tex] (If [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true)
2. [tex]\( q \Rightarrow r \)[/tex] (If [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( r \)[/tex] is true)
We need to evaluate the following options:
A. [tex]\( p \Rightarrow r \)[/tex]
B. [tex]\( s \Rightarrow p \)[/tex]
C. [tex]\( r \Rightarrow p \)[/tex]
D. [tex]\( p \Rightarrow s \)[/tex]
Let's consider each option in detail:
Option A: [tex]\( p \Rightarrow r \)[/tex]
1. Given [tex]\( p \Rightarrow q \)[/tex], if [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( q \)[/tex] must be true.
2. Given [tex]\( q \Rightarrow r \)[/tex], if [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( r \)[/tex] must be true.
From these two statements, we can link [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( r \)[/tex] using a logical transitivity property. If [tex]\( p \)[/tex] implies [tex]\( q \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] implies [tex]\( r \)[/tex], then [tex]\( p \)[/tex] must imply [tex]\( r \)[/tex].
Thus, [tex]\( p \Rightarrow r \)[/tex] is a valid conclusion and must be true.
Option B: [tex]\( s \Rightarrow p \)[/tex]
There is no information given about [tex]\( s \)[/tex] and its relationship to [tex]\( p \)[/tex]. Therefore, we cannot conclude that [tex]\( s \Rightarrow p \)[/tex] must be true.
Option C: [tex]\( r \Rightarrow p \)[/tex]
This option suggests that if [tex]\( r \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is true. However, there is no information given that directly relates [tex]\( r \)[/tex] back to [tex]\( p \)[/tex]. Hence, we cannot conclude that [tex]\( r \Rightarrow p \)[/tex] is true based on the given information.
Option D: [tex]\( p \Rightarrow s \)[/tex]
Similar to Option B, there is no information given about [tex]\( s \)[/tex] in relation to [tex]\( p \)[/tex]. Therefore, we cannot conclude that [tex]\( p \Rightarrow s \)[/tex] must be true.
After evaluating all the options, the statement that must be true given [tex]\( p \Rightarrow q \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \Rightarrow r \)[/tex] is:
A. [tex]\( p \Rightarrow r \)[/tex]
We are given two statements:
1. [tex]\( p \Rightarrow q \)[/tex] (If [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true)
2. [tex]\( q \Rightarrow r \)[/tex] (If [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( r \)[/tex] is true)
We need to evaluate the following options:
A. [tex]\( p \Rightarrow r \)[/tex]
B. [tex]\( s \Rightarrow p \)[/tex]
C. [tex]\( r \Rightarrow p \)[/tex]
D. [tex]\( p \Rightarrow s \)[/tex]
Let's consider each option in detail:
Option A: [tex]\( p \Rightarrow r \)[/tex]
1. Given [tex]\( p \Rightarrow q \)[/tex], if [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( q \)[/tex] must be true.
2. Given [tex]\( q \Rightarrow r \)[/tex], if [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( r \)[/tex] must be true.
From these two statements, we can link [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( r \)[/tex] using a logical transitivity property. If [tex]\( p \)[/tex] implies [tex]\( q \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] implies [tex]\( r \)[/tex], then [tex]\( p \)[/tex] must imply [tex]\( r \)[/tex].
Thus, [tex]\( p \Rightarrow r \)[/tex] is a valid conclusion and must be true.
Option B: [tex]\( s \Rightarrow p \)[/tex]
There is no information given about [tex]\( s \)[/tex] and its relationship to [tex]\( p \)[/tex]. Therefore, we cannot conclude that [tex]\( s \Rightarrow p \)[/tex] must be true.
Option C: [tex]\( r \Rightarrow p \)[/tex]
This option suggests that if [tex]\( r \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is true. However, there is no information given that directly relates [tex]\( r \)[/tex] back to [tex]\( p \)[/tex]. Hence, we cannot conclude that [tex]\( r \Rightarrow p \)[/tex] is true based on the given information.
Option D: [tex]\( p \Rightarrow s \)[/tex]
Similar to Option B, there is no information given about [tex]\( s \)[/tex] in relation to [tex]\( p \)[/tex]. Therefore, we cannot conclude that [tex]\( p \Rightarrow s \)[/tex] must be true.
After evaluating all the options, the statement that must be true given [tex]\( p \Rightarrow q \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \Rightarrow r \)[/tex] is:
A. [tex]\( p \Rightarrow r \)[/tex]
Thank you for visiting our platform. We hope you found the answers you were looking for. Come back anytime you need more information. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.