Westonci.ca is the premier destination for reliable answers to your questions, provided by a community of experts. Discover solutions to your questions from experienced professionals across multiple fields on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.
Sagot :
Sure, let's solve the given problem step-by-step:
We are given that the surface area [tex]\( S_A \)[/tex] of a cube is 480 square meters. Our objective is to compare the side length [tex]\( s \)[/tex] corresponding to this surface area with the given options.
For a cube, the surface area [tex]\( S_A \)[/tex] is given by:
[tex]\[ S_A = 6s^2 \][/tex]
We need to find the side length [tex]\( s \)[/tex] for which the surface area [tex]\( S_A \)[/tex] of the cube is 480 square meters. We solve for [tex]\( s \)[/tex] by rearranging the formula:
[tex]\[ s = \sqrt{\frac{S_A}{6}} \][/tex]
Substituting the given surface area [tex]\( S_A = 480 \)[/tex] into the equation:
[tex]\[ s = \sqrt{\frac{480}{6}} \][/tex]
Calculating the inside of the square root:
[tex]\[ \frac{480}{6} = 80 \][/tex]
So,
[tex]\[ s = \sqrt{80} = \sqrt{16 \cdot 5} = 4 \sqrt{5} \][/tex]
Next, we need to compare this side length with the given options:
1. [tex]\( \sqrt{5} \)[/tex]
2. [tex]\( \sqrt{35} \)[/tex]
3. [tex]\( \sqrt{210} \)[/tex]
4. [tex]\( 7 \sqrt{5} \)[/tex]
Let's evaluate each option numerically:
1. [tex]\( \sqrt{5} \approx 2.236 \)[/tex]
2. [tex]\( \sqrt{35} \approx 5.916 \)[/tex]
3. [tex]\( \sqrt{210} \approx 14.491 \)[/tex]
4. [tex]\( 7 \sqrt{5} \approx 7 \times 2.236 = 15.652 \)[/tex]
Now, let's compare [tex]\( 4 \sqrt{5} \)[/tex] to these numerical values:
[tex]\[ 4 \sqrt{5} \approx 4 \times 2.236 = 8.944 \][/tex]
Thus, the side length [tex]\( s \)[/tex] corresponding to the surface area of 480 square meters is approximately 8.944 meters. Comparing it to the given options, we can see that:
- [tex]\( \sqrt{5} \approx 2.236 \)[/tex] (smaller)
- [tex]\( \sqrt{35} \approx 5.916 \)[/tex] (smaller)
- [tex]\( \sqrt{210} \approx 14.491 \)[/tex] (larger)
- [tex]\( 7 \sqrt{5} \approx 15.652 \)[/tex] (larger)
Therefore, the side length [tex]\( 4 \sqrt{5} \)[/tex] meters corresponding to the given surface area of 480 square meters is closer to but still different than all the given options. The correct comparison would be in terms of evaluating whether the approximate numbers match any given options within some tolerance, but strictly speaking, [tex]\( 4 \sqrt{5} \approx 8.944 \)[/tex] does not exactly match any provided numerical equivalence.
We are given that the surface area [tex]\( S_A \)[/tex] of a cube is 480 square meters. Our objective is to compare the side length [tex]\( s \)[/tex] corresponding to this surface area with the given options.
For a cube, the surface area [tex]\( S_A \)[/tex] is given by:
[tex]\[ S_A = 6s^2 \][/tex]
We need to find the side length [tex]\( s \)[/tex] for which the surface area [tex]\( S_A \)[/tex] of the cube is 480 square meters. We solve for [tex]\( s \)[/tex] by rearranging the formula:
[tex]\[ s = \sqrt{\frac{S_A}{6}} \][/tex]
Substituting the given surface area [tex]\( S_A = 480 \)[/tex] into the equation:
[tex]\[ s = \sqrt{\frac{480}{6}} \][/tex]
Calculating the inside of the square root:
[tex]\[ \frac{480}{6} = 80 \][/tex]
So,
[tex]\[ s = \sqrt{80} = \sqrt{16 \cdot 5} = 4 \sqrt{5} \][/tex]
Next, we need to compare this side length with the given options:
1. [tex]\( \sqrt{5} \)[/tex]
2. [tex]\( \sqrt{35} \)[/tex]
3. [tex]\( \sqrt{210} \)[/tex]
4. [tex]\( 7 \sqrt{5} \)[/tex]
Let's evaluate each option numerically:
1. [tex]\( \sqrt{5} \approx 2.236 \)[/tex]
2. [tex]\( \sqrt{35} \approx 5.916 \)[/tex]
3. [tex]\( \sqrt{210} \approx 14.491 \)[/tex]
4. [tex]\( 7 \sqrt{5} \approx 7 \times 2.236 = 15.652 \)[/tex]
Now, let's compare [tex]\( 4 \sqrt{5} \)[/tex] to these numerical values:
[tex]\[ 4 \sqrt{5} \approx 4 \times 2.236 = 8.944 \][/tex]
Thus, the side length [tex]\( s \)[/tex] corresponding to the surface area of 480 square meters is approximately 8.944 meters. Comparing it to the given options, we can see that:
- [tex]\( \sqrt{5} \approx 2.236 \)[/tex] (smaller)
- [tex]\( \sqrt{35} \approx 5.916 \)[/tex] (smaller)
- [tex]\( \sqrt{210} \approx 14.491 \)[/tex] (larger)
- [tex]\( 7 \sqrt{5} \approx 15.652 \)[/tex] (larger)
Therefore, the side length [tex]\( 4 \sqrt{5} \)[/tex] meters corresponding to the given surface area of 480 square meters is closer to but still different than all the given options. The correct comparison would be in terms of evaluating whether the approximate numbers match any given options within some tolerance, but strictly speaking, [tex]\( 4 \sqrt{5} \approx 8.944 \)[/tex] does not exactly match any provided numerical equivalence.
We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.