Discover the answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where experts share their knowledge and insights with you. Experience the ease of finding reliable answers to your questions from a vast community of knowledgeable experts. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.
Sagot :
To determine the equation that represents the direct variation between [tex]\( a \)[/tex] and [tex]\( b \)[/tex], we need to understand the relationship described in the problem.
We are given that [tex]\( b \)[/tex] is located the same distance from 0 as [tex]\( a \)[/tex], but in the opposite direction. This relationship can be described mathematically as [tex]\( b \)[/tex] being the negative of [tex]\( a \)[/tex].
Consider the given example: when [tex]\( a = -2.75 \)[/tex], we have [tex]\( b = 2.75 \)[/tex].
Let's analyze each potential equation one by one to check which one fits this description:
1. [tex]\( b = -a \)[/tex]:
- If [tex]\( a = -2.75 \)[/tex], then [tex]\( b = -(-2.75) = 2.75 \)[/tex].
- This is true for the example given.
2. [tex]\( -b = -a \)[/tex]:
- If [tex]\( a = -2.75 \)[/tex], then [tex]\( -b = -(-2.75) = 2.75 \)[/tex].
- This simplifies to [tex]\( b = -2.75 \)[/tex], which is incorrect for the given example.
3. [tex]\( b - a = 0 \)[/tex]:
- If [tex]\( a = -2.75 \)[/tex], then [tex]\( b - (-2.75) = 0 \)[/tex].
- This simplifies to [tex]\( b + 2.75 = 0 \)[/tex], or [tex]\( b = -2.75 \)[/tex], which is incorrect for the given example.
4. [tex]\( b(-a) = 0 \)[/tex]:
- This equation implies that either [tex]\( b = 0 \)[/tex] or [tex]\( -a = 0 \)[/tex], neither of which are true for the given values (since [tex]\( a = -2.75 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( b = 2.75 \)[/tex]).
- Thus, this equation does not fit the relationship described.
Based on the analysis, the correct equation that represents the direct variation between [tex]\( a \)[/tex] and [tex]\( b \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ b = -a \][/tex]
So, the correct answer is:
[tex]\[ b = -a \][/tex]
We are given that [tex]\( b \)[/tex] is located the same distance from 0 as [tex]\( a \)[/tex], but in the opposite direction. This relationship can be described mathematically as [tex]\( b \)[/tex] being the negative of [tex]\( a \)[/tex].
Consider the given example: when [tex]\( a = -2.75 \)[/tex], we have [tex]\( b = 2.75 \)[/tex].
Let's analyze each potential equation one by one to check which one fits this description:
1. [tex]\( b = -a \)[/tex]:
- If [tex]\( a = -2.75 \)[/tex], then [tex]\( b = -(-2.75) = 2.75 \)[/tex].
- This is true for the example given.
2. [tex]\( -b = -a \)[/tex]:
- If [tex]\( a = -2.75 \)[/tex], then [tex]\( -b = -(-2.75) = 2.75 \)[/tex].
- This simplifies to [tex]\( b = -2.75 \)[/tex], which is incorrect for the given example.
3. [tex]\( b - a = 0 \)[/tex]:
- If [tex]\( a = -2.75 \)[/tex], then [tex]\( b - (-2.75) = 0 \)[/tex].
- This simplifies to [tex]\( b + 2.75 = 0 \)[/tex], or [tex]\( b = -2.75 \)[/tex], which is incorrect for the given example.
4. [tex]\( b(-a) = 0 \)[/tex]:
- This equation implies that either [tex]\( b = 0 \)[/tex] or [tex]\( -a = 0 \)[/tex], neither of which are true for the given values (since [tex]\( a = -2.75 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( b = 2.75 \)[/tex]).
- Thus, this equation does not fit the relationship described.
Based on the analysis, the correct equation that represents the direct variation between [tex]\( a \)[/tex] and [tex]\( b \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ b = -a \][/tex]
So, the correct answer is:
[tex]\[ b = -a \][/tex]
Thanks for using our platform. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed with our latest expert advice.