Discover the best answers at Westonci.ca, where experts share their insights and knowledge with you. Connect with a community of experts ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
To determine the equation that represents the direct variation between [tex]\( a \)[/tex] and [tex]\( b \)[/tex], we need to understand the relationship described in the problem.
We are given that [tex]\( b \)[/tex] is located the same distance from 0 as [tex]\( a \)[/tex], but in the opposite direction. This relationship can be described mathematically as [tex]\( b \)[/tex] being the negative of [tex]\( a \)[/tex].
Consider the given example: when [tex]\( a = -2.75 \)[/tex], we have [tex]\( b = 2.75 \)[/tex].
Let's analyze each potential equation one by one to check which one fits this description:
1. [tex]\( b = -a \)[/tex]:
- If [tex]\( a = -2.75 \)[/tex], then [tex]\( b = -(-2.75) = 2.75 \)[/tex].
- This is true for the example given.
2. [tex]\( -b = -a \)[/tex]:
- If [tex]\( a = -2.75 \)[/tex], then [tex]\( -b = -(-2.75) = 2.75 \)[/tex].
- This simplifies to [tex]\( b = -2.75 \)[/tex], which is incorrect for the given example.
3. [tex]\( b - a = 0 \)[/tex]:
- If [tex]\( a = -2.75 \)[/tex], then [tex]\( b - (-2.75) = 0 \)[/tex].
- This simplifies to [tex]\( b + 2.75 = 0 \)[/tex], or [tex]\( b = -2.75 \)[/tex], which is incorrect for the given example.
4. [tex]\( b(-a) = 0 \)[/tex]:
- This equation implies that either [tex]\( b = 0 \)[/tex] or [tex]\( -a = 0 \)[/tex], neither of which are true for the given values (since [tex]\( a = -2.75 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( b = 2.75 \)[/tex]).
- Thus, this equation does not fit the relationship described.
Based on the analysis, the correct equation that represents the direct variation between [tex]\( a \)[/tex] and [tex]\( b \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ b = -a \][/tex]
So, the correct answer is:
[tex]\[ b = -a \][/tex]
We are given that [tex]\( b \)[/tex] is located the same distance from 0 as [tex]\( a \)[/tex], but in the opposite direction. This relationship can be described mathematically as [tex]\( b \)[/tex] being the negative of [tex]\( a \)[/tex].
Consider the given example: when [tex]\( a = -2.75 \)[/tex], we have [tex]\( b = 2.75 \)[/tex].
Let's analyze each potential equation one by one to check which one fits this description:
1. [tex]\( b = -a \)[/tex]:
- If [tex]\( a = -2.75 \)[/tex], then [tex]\( b = -(-2.75) = 2.75 \)[/tex].
- This is true for the example given.
2. [tex]\( -b = -a \)[/tex]:
- If [tex]\( a = -2.75 \)[/tex], then [tex]\( -b = -(-2.75) = 2.75 \)[/tex].
- This simplifies to [tex]\( b = -2.75 \)[/tex], which is incorrect for the given example.
3. [tex]\( b - a = 0 \)[/tex]:
- If [tex]\( a = -2.75 \)[/tex], then [tex]\( b - (-2.75) = 0 \)[/tex].
- This simplifies to [tex]\( b + 2.75 = 0 \)[/tex], or [tex]\( b = -2.75 \)[/tex], which is incorrect for the given example.
4. [tex]\( b(-a) = 0 \)[/tex]:
- This equation implies that either [tex]\( b = 0 \)[/tex] or [tex]\( -a = 0 \)[/tex], neither of which are true for the given values (since [tex]\( a = -2.75 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( b = 2.75 \)[/tex]).
- Thus, this equation does not fit the relationship described.
Based on the analysis, the correct equation that represents the direct variation between [tex]\( a \)[/tex] and [tex]\( b \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ b = -a \][/tex]
So, the correct answer is:
[tex]\[ b = -a \][/tex]
Visit us again for up-to-date and reliable answers. We're always ready to assist you with your informational needs. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Westonci.ca is committed to providing accurate answers. Come back soon for more trustworthy information.