At Westonci.ca, we provide clear, reliable answers to all your questions. Join our vibrant community and get the solutions you need. Get quick and reliable answers to your questions from a dedicated community of professionals on our platform. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.
Sagot :
To determine whether Jace's earnings are proportional to the number of hours that he works, we need to check if the ratio of earnings to hours is constant for each dataset. Here's the step-by-step solution:
1. Identify the data points:
- For 1 hour of work, Jace earns \[tex]$20. - For 2 hours of work, Jace earns \$[/tex]30.
- For 3 hours of work, Jace earns \[tex]$40. 2. Calculate the ratio of earnings to hours for each data point: - For 1 hour of work: \(\frac{\$[/tex]20}{1 \text{ hour}}\) = 20.0
- For 2 hours of work: [tex]\(\frac{\$30}{2 \text{ hours}}\)[/tex] = 15.0
- For 3 hours of work: [tex]\(\frac{\$40}{3 \text{ hours}}\)[/tex] ≈ 13.33 (approximately)
3. List the calculated ratios:
- Ratio for 1 hour: 20.0
- Ratio for 2 hours: 15.0
- Ratio for 3 hours: 13.33
4. Compare the ratios:
- The calculated ratios are 20.0, 15.0, and 13.33.
5. Check for consistency:
- Since the ratios 20.0, 15.0, and 13.33 are not equal, the ratios are not constant.
6. Conclusion:
- Because the ratios of earnings to hours are not the same, Jace's earnings are not proportional to the number of hours that he works.
In summary, Jace's earnings are not proportional to the number of hours that he works, as evidenced by the varying ratios of earnings to hours.
1. Identify the data points:
- For 1 hour of work, Jace earns \[tex]$20. - For 2 hours of work, Jace earns \$[/tex]30.
- For 3 hours of work, Jace earns \[tex]$40. 2. Calculate the ratio of earnings to hours for each data point: - For 1 hour of work: \(\frac{\$[/tex]20}{1 \text{ hour}}\) = 20.0
- For 2 hours of work: [tex]\(\frac{\$30}{2 \text{ hours}}\)[/tex] = 15.0
- For 3 hours of work: [tex]\(\frac{\$40}{3 \text{ hours}}\)[/tex] ≈ 13.33 (approximately)
3. List the calculated ratios:
- Ratio for 1 hour: 20.0
- Ratio for 2 hours: 15.0
- Ratio for 3 hours: 13.33
4. Compare the ratios:
- The calculated ratios are 20.0, 15.0, and 13.33.
5. Check for consistency:
- Since the ratios 20.0, 15.0, and 13.33 are not equal, the ratios are not constant.
6. Conclusion:
- Because the ratios of earnings to hours are not the same, Jace's earnings are not proportional to the number of hours that he works.
In summary, Jace's earnings are not proportional to the number of hours that he works, as evidenced by the varying ratios of earnings to hours.
We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed by returning for our latest expert advice.