Welcome to Westonci.ca, the ultimate question and answer platform. Get expert answers to your questions quickly and accurately. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.
Sagot :
To determine whether the equation that produced the predicted values represents a good line of best fit, we need to analyze several key components:
1. Sum of the Residuals:
- The residuals are calculated as the difference between the actual and predicted values for each month.
- Given residuals: [4, -1, -1, 1, -1, -1]
- Sum of the residuals: 4 + (-1) + (-1) + 1 + (-1) + (-1) = 1
2. Magnitude of Residuals:
- For a good fit, the residuals should not be excessively large in magnitude.
- Given residuals: [4, -1, -1, 1, -1, -1]
- Observing these residuals, we notice that 4 is significantly higher in magnitude compared to the others.
3. Good Fit Criteria:
- If the sum of the residuals is around zero, it indicates that the positive and negative errors balance each other out.
- Small residuals indicate a close prediction to the actual values, suggesting accuracy.
Conclusion:
- Sum of the Residuals: The sum of the residuals is 1, which is a small number. This suggests that overall the errors balance out well.
- Residual Magnitude: However, one of the residuals (4) is quite large in magnitude, deviating considerably from zero.
Given these observations:
- The small sum of the residuals indicates that the errors almost balance each other out.
- The statement "No, the equation is not a good fit because the sum of the residuals is a large number" is incorrect because the sum is actually small (1).
- The statement "No, the equation is not a good fit because the residuals are all far from zero" looks at the magnitude and the presence of a residual (4) far from zero could imply a poor fit.
- The statement "Yes, the equation is a good fit because the residuals are all far from zero" is incorrect because good residuals should be close to zero.
- The statement "Yes, the equation is a good fit because the sum of the residuals is a small number" correctly identifies the balance of residuals, despite one being large, the overall assessment is correct based on the given fit criteria.
Thus, the most appropriate conclusion is:
Yes, the equation is a good fit because the sum of the residuals is a small number.
1. Sum of the Residuals:
- The residuals are calculated as the difference between the actual and predicted values for each month.
- Given residuals: [4, -1, -1, 1, -1, -1]
- Sum of the residuals: 4 + (-1) + (-1) + 1 + (-1) + (-1) = 1
2. Magnitude of Residuals:
- For a good fit, the residuals should not be excessively large in magnitude.
- Given residuals: [4, -1, -1, 1, -1, -1]
- Observing these residuals, we notice that 4 is significantly higher in magnitude compared to the others.
3. Good Fit Criteria:
- If the sum of the residuals is around zero, it indicates that the positive and negative errors balance each other out.
- Small residuals indicate a close prediction to the actual values, suggesting accuracy.
Conclusion:
- Sum of the Residuals: The sum of the residuals is 1, which is a small number. This suggests that overall the errors balance out well.
- Residual Magnitude: However, one of the residuals (4) is quite large in magnitude, deviating considerably from zero.
Given these observations:
- The small sum of the residuals indicates that the errors almost balance each other out.
- The statement "No, the equation is not a good fit because the sum of the residuals is a large number" is incorrect because the sum is actually small (1).
- The statement "No, the equation is not a good fit because the residuals are all far from zero" looks at the magnitude and the presence of a residual (4) far from zero could imply a poor fit.
- The statement "Yes, the equation is a good fit because the residuals are all far from zero" is incorrect because good residuals should be close to zero.
- The statement "Yes, the equation is a good fit because the sum of the residuals is a small number" correctly identifies the balance of residuals, despite one being large, the overall assessment is correct based on the given fit criteria.
Thus, the most appropriate conclusion is:
Yes, the equation is a good fit because the sum of the residuals is a small number.
We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed by returning for our latest expert advice.