Get reliable answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where our knowledgeable community is always ready to help. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.

Define assumption. Choose one of the following controversial issues:

1. Gun Control
2. Prostitution
3. Legalization of Marijuana

Choose a stance ("for" or "against") for your selected issue. Explain what assumptions you would expect to be in your argument. How could your opposition "attack" these assumptions?

Sagot :

Final answer:

The response explains the concept of assumptions in arguments, particularly regarding the Legalization of Marijuana, explores assumptions in pro and con stances, and discusses how opposition can challenge these assumptions.


Explanation:

Assumption refers to unstated premises that underlie an argument, taken for granted by the arguer or audience. In the context of the Legalization of Marijuana, a pro stance could assume benefits like economic growth and medicinal value, while a con stance may assume potential negative impacts on public health and safety.

For a pro argument on Legalization of Marijuana, assumptions about job creation, tax revenue, and medical benefits may be made. The opposition could attack these assumptions by questioning the reliability of data supporting these claims, highlighting potential social harms, or pointing out lack of comprehensive regulatory frameworks.

In conclusion, understanding and addressing underlying assumptions is crucial in constructing and defending arguments on controversial issues like Legalization of Marijuana.


Learn more about Understanding assumptions in arguments regarding controversial issues here:

https://brainly.com/question/39013807