Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform, offering detailed and reliable answers from a knowledgeable community. Join our Q&A platform to get precise answers from experts in diverse fields and enhance your understanding. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
To determine whether [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are inverses of each other, we need to verify two conditions:
1. [tex]\( f(g(x)) = x \)[/tex]
2. [tex]\( g(f(x)) = x \)[/tex]
These conditions ensure that applying one function after the other returns the original input, which is the definition of inverse functions.
Here’s how we verify:
### Step-by-Step Verification
1. First Condition: [tex]\( f(g(x)) = x \)[/tex]
When you apply [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] to an input [tex]\( x \)[/tex] and then apply [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] to the result, you should get back the original input [tex]\( x \)[/tex]. Mathematically, this is written as:
[tex]\[ f(g(x)) = x \][/tex]
This means that for every [tex]\( x \)[/tex] in the domain of [tex]\( g \)[/tex], [tex]\( f(g(x)) \)[/tex] returns [tex]\( x \)[/tex].
2. Second Condition: [tex]\( g(f(x)) = x \)[/tex]
Similarly, when you apply [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] to an input [tex]\( x \)[/tex] and then apply [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] to the result, you should also get back the original input [tex]\( x \)[/tex]. Mathematically, this is written as:
[tex]\[ g(f(x)) = x \][/tex]
This means that for every [tex]\( x \)[/tex] in the domain of [tex]\( f \)[/tex], [tex]\( g(f(x)) \)[/tex] returns [tex]\( x \)[/tex].
### Analysis of Given Statements
1. [tex]\( f(g(x)) = x \)[/tex]
This statement only verifies the first condition. It is necessary but not sufficient by itself for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] to be inverses because it does not verify the second condition.
2. [tex]\( f(g(x)) = x \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(f(x)) = -x \)[/tex]
This statement verifies the first condition correctly. However, the second condition is incorrect because it must be [tex]\( g(f(x)) = x \)[/tex], not [tex]\( g(f(x)) = -x \)[/tex].
3. [tex]\( f(g(x)) = \frac{1}{g(f(x))} \)[/tex]
Neither of these expressions aligns with the conditions required to verify inverse functions. Thus, this statement is incorrect.
4. [tex]\( f(g(x)) = x \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(f(x)) = x \)[/tex]
This statement verifies both conditions necessary to confirm that [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are indeed inverses of each other.
Given these verifications, the correct statement that verifies [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are inverses of each other is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{4} \][/tex]
1. [tex]\( f(g(x)) = x \)[/tex]
2. [tex]\( g(f(x)) = x \)[/tex]
These conditions ensure that applying one function after the other returns the original input, which is the definition of inverse functions.
Here’s how we verify:
### Step-by-Step Verification
1. First Condition: [tex]\( f(g(x)) = x \)[/tex]
When you apply [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] to an input [tex]\( x \)[/tex] and then apply [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] to the result, you should get back the original input [tex]\( x \)[/tex]. Mathematically, this is written as:
[tex]\[ f(g(x)) = x \][/tex]
This means that for every [tex]\( x \)[/tex] in the domain of [tex]\( g \)[/tex], [tex]\( f(g(x)) \)[/tex] returns [tex]\( x \)[/tex].
2. Second Condition: [tex]\( g(f(x)) = x \)[/tex]
Similarly, when you apply [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] to an input [tex]\( x \)[/tex] and then apply [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] to the result, you should also get back the original input [tex]\( x \)[/tex]. Mathematically, this is written as:
[tex]\[ g(f(x)) = x \][/tex]
This means that for every [tex]\( x \)[/tex] in the domain of [tex]\( f \)[/tex], [tex]\( g(f(x)) \)[/tex] returns [tex]\( x \)[/tex].
### Analysis of Given Statements
1. [tex]\( f(g(x)) = x \)[/tex]
This statement only verifies the first condition. It is necessary but not sufficient by itself for [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] to be inverses because it does not verify the second condition.
2. [tex]\( f(g(x)) = x \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(f(x)) = -x \)[/tex]
This statement verifies the first condition correctly. However, the second condition is incorrect because it must be [tex]\( g(f(x)) = x \)[/tex], not [tex]\( g(f(x)) = -x \)[/tex].
3. [tex]\( f(g(x)) = \frac{1}{g(f(x))} \)[/tex]
Neither of these expressions aligns with the conditions required to verify inverse functions. Thus, this statement is incorrect.
4. [tex]\( f(g(x)) = x \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(f(x)) = x \)[/tex]
This statement verifies both conditions necessary to confirm that [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are indeed inverses of each other.
Given these verifications, the correct statement that verifies [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are inverses of each other is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{4} \][/tex]
Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca. Stay informed by coming back for more detailed answers.