At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the answers you need, thanks to our active and informed community. Explore thousands of questions and answers from knowledgeable experts in various fields on our Q&A platform. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.
Sagot :
A reflection over the line [tex]\( y = x \)[/tex] involves swapping the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-coordinate and the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-coordinate of each point. Essentially, for a point [tex]\( (x, y) \)[/tex], its reflection over the line [tex]\( y = x \)[/tex] would be [tex]\( (y, x) \)[/tex].
Let's consider the given transformations and see which one correctly represents this:
1. [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (-x, y)\)[/tex]: This transformation changes the sign of the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-coordinate while keeping the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-coordinate unchanged. This is a reflection over the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis, not over the line [tex]\( y = x \)[/tex].
2. [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (-x, -y)\)[/tex]: This transformation changes the signs of both the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-coordinate and the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-coordinate. This is a 180-degree rotation around the origin or a point reflection over the origin, not a reflection over the line [tex]\( y = x \)[/tex].
3. [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (y, x)\)[/tex]: This transformation swaps the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-coordinate and the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-coordinate. This directly matches the reflection over the line [tex]\( y = x \)[/tex], as it takes a point [tex]\( (x, y) \)[/tex] and reflects it to [tex]\( (y, x) \)[/tex].
4. [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (y, -x)\)[/tex]: This transformation swaps the coordinates and changes the sign of the new [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-coordinate (which was originally the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-coordinate). This is not a reflection over the line [tex]\( y = x \)[/tex] but a rotation combined with a reflection over the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis.
Thus, the correct transformation that represents a reflection over the line [tex]\( y = x \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (y, x) \][/tex]
Let's consider the given transformations and see which one correctly represents this:
1. [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (-x, y)\)[/tex]: This transformation changes the sign of the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-coordinate while keeping the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-coordinate unchanged. This is a reflection over the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis, not over the line [tex]\( y = x \)[/tex].
2. [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (-x, -y)\)[/tex]: This transformation changes the signs of both the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-coordinate and the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-coordinate. This is a 180-degree rotation around the origin or a point reflection over the origin, not a reflection over the line [tex]\( y = x \)[/tex].
3. [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (y, x)\)[/tex]: This transformation swaps the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-coordinate and the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-coordinate. This directly matches the reflection over the line [tex]\( y = x \)[/tex], as it takes a point [tex]\( (x, y) \)[/tex] and reflects it to [tex]\( (y, x) \)[/tex].
4. [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (y, -x)\)[/tex]: This transformation swaps the coordinates and changes the sign of the new [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-coordinate (which was originally the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-coordinate). This is not a reflection over the line [tex]\( y = x \)[/tex] but a rotation combined with a reflection over the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis.
Thus, the correct transformation that represents a reflection over the line [tex]\( y = x \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (y, x) \][/tex]
We appreciate your visit. Hopefully, the answers you found were beneficial. Don't hesitate to come back for more information. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.