Answered

Discover the answers you need at Westonci.ca, a dynamic Q&A platform where knowledge is shared freely by a community of experts. Discover a wealth of knowledge from professionals across various disciplines on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.

Congress has passed a federal minimum wage law, yet the Constitution does not explicitly mention setting wages as part of Congress's powers. If the law were challenged, on what basis could the Supreme Court find that Congress acted within its scope?

A. The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution
B. The separate sovereigns doctrine
C. The expressed powers doctrine
D. The elastic clause of the Constitution

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

The Supreme Court could find Congress acted within its scope based on the expressed powers doctrine, necessary and proper clause, and elastic clause of the Constitution.


Explanation:

The Supreme Court could find that Congress acted within its scope based on the expressed powers doctrine, the implied powers granted by the necessary and proper clause, and the elastic clause of the Constitution. These clauses provide Congress with the authority to enact laws like setting a federal minimum wage, even though it is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution.


Learn more about Congress's scope in enacting laws here:

https://brainly.com/question/38840931


We appreciate your visit. Hopefully, the answers you found were beneficial. Don't hesitate to come back for more information. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. We're dedicated to helping you find the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Don't hesitate to return for more.