Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where our expert community is always ready to help with accurate information. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.

Jillana begins to solve a linear equation that results in a variable expression set equal to the same variable expression. Which is the best interpretation of this solution?

A. The equation has one solution: [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex].
B. The equation has one solution: [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex].
C. The equation has no solution.
D. The equation has infinite solutions.

Sagot :

To analyze Jillana's linear equation, consider the following general form for a linear equation:

[tex]\[ ax + b = ax + b \][/tex]

Here, [tex]\( a \)[/tex] and [tex]\( b \)[/tex] are constants, and [tex]\(x\)[/tex] is the variable.

When you simplify this equation, you'll subtract [tex]\(ax + b\)[/tex] from both sides:

[tex]\[ ax + b - (ax + b) = ax + b - (ax + b) \][/tex]
[tex]\[ 0 = 0 \][/tex]

The resulting statement [tex]\( 0 = 0 \)[/tex] is always true, independent of the value of [tex]\(x\)[/tex]. This means that any value for [tex]\(x\)[/tex] will satisfy the original equation.

Therefore, we interpret the equation as having infinitely many solutions, since every value for [tex]\(x\)[/tex] makes the equation true. The best interpretation of this situation is:

The equation has infinite solutions.