gabby44215
Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions are answered by a community of knowledgeable contributors. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.

Select the correct answer.

What argument does the author anticipate and refute in this excerpt from the Declaration of Independence?

"Nor have we been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity."

A. If the American colonists are unhappy with the king, they should appeal to Parliament.
B. Most British Parliament members sympathize with the plight of the American colonies.
C. The American colonies are well represented in the British Parliament and have no right to blame the king.
D. The allegations against the king made by the colonists are without proof and unjustified.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

The author refutes the argument that American colonists should appeal to Parliament. Instead, the emphasis is on the necessity for separation due to British unresponsiveness to appeals based on justice and shared heritage.


Explanation:

The author anticipates and refutes the argument that the American colonists should appeal to Parliament if unhappy with the king in this excerpt from the Declaration of Independence. By highlighting their attempts to seek redress from the British brethren to no avail, the author rejects the notion that appealing solely to Parliament would have been a sufficient course of action.

Instead, the author emphasizes the failure of the British to respond to appeals based on justice, consanguinity, and shared heritage, signaling the necessity for separation due to the refusal of the British to acknowledge the colonists' grievances.

Ultimately, the excerpt underscores the declaration of separation from Britain, portraying the British as foes in war but leaving the door open for friendship in peace, as a result of their unresponsiveness to just appeals.


Learn more about Declaration of Independence here:

https://brainly.com/question/36064786


Thanks for stopping by. We are committed to providing the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Your questions are important to us at Westonci.ca. Visit again for expert answers and reliable information.