Answered

Discover the answers you need at Westonci.ca, a dynamic Q&A platform where knowledge is shared freely by a community of experts. Explore a wealth of knowledge from professionals across different disciplines on our comprehensive platform. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.

Read the following passage to answer the question below.

"There is no position which depends on clearer principles, than that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid."
—Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 78, "The Judiciary Department," 1788

Which of the following statements best summarizes Hamilton's argument?

A. The Supreme Court should have the power of judicial review.
B. Arguments against the adoption of the Constitution are invalid.
C. The Constitution delegates ultimate authority to the legislative branch.
D. Few legislative acts are contrary to the Constitution.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Hamilton's argument in Federalist No. 78 highlights the significance of judicial review to ensure the validity of legislative acts.


Explanation:

Alexander Hamilton, in Federalist No. 78, argues that the power of judicial review is essential. He asserts that any legislative act that goes against the Constitution is invalid, emphasizing the importance of upholding the Constitution over any conflicting laws.


Learn more about judicial review here:

https://brainly.com/question/42269029


We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.