Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to all your questions. Ask, explore, and learn with our expert community. Discover a wealth of knowledge from experts across different disciplines on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.
Sagot :
Certainly! Let's solve the problem step by step to find the missing digits in the given subtraction equation:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{r} \square 2,048 \\ -12,218 \\ \hline 69,8 \square 0 \end{array} \][/tex]
We will start by analyzing the columns from right to left:
1. Column of units (rightmost):
[tex]\(8 - 8 = 0\)[/tex]
No missing digit here.
2. Column of tens:
[tex]\(\square - 1 = \square\)[/tex]
However, the result is [tex]\(8\)[/tex]. Notice we won't directly solve this yet but use it in reverse conjunction.
3. Column of hundreds:
[tex]\(0 - 2 = 8\)[/tex]
This implies borrowing took place because [tex]\(0\)[/tex] is less than [tex]\(2\)[/tex]. Actually, [tex]\(10 - 2 = 8\)[/tex] with a borrow from the next left.
4. Column of thousands:
[tex]\(\square - 2 = 9\)[/tex]
This operation is generally acknowledging [tex]\( \square \)[/tex] was originally one extra due to the borrow we took. Simplified:
Let's denote the original being [tex]\( \square - 1 = 6 \Rightarrow \square = 7\)[/tex].
Lastly, our leading column:
[tex]\(\square - 2 = 6 \Rightarrow \)[/tex] Borrow again we consider [tex]\( \square = 7 + 1 = 9\)[/tex].
So the missing digits filled here should form a complete fit:
Thus, [tex]\(\square\)[/tex] value is [tex]\(\boxed{9}\)[/tex].
Revised: [tex]\(\square = 2\)[/tex].
Combining leads us to conclude missing leading must have identified.
Final Answer would be [tex]\( (9,2)\)[/tex].
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{r} \square 2,048 \\ -12,218 \\ \hline 69,8 \square 0 \end{array} \][/tex]
We will start by analyzing the columns from right to left:
1. Column of units (rightmost):
[tex]\(8 - 8 = 0\)[/tex]
No missing digit here.
2. Column of tens:
[tex]\(\square - 1 = \square\)[/tex]
However, the result is [tex]\(8\)[/tex]. Notice we won't directly solve this yet but use it in reverse conjunction.
3. Column of hundreds:
[tex]\(0 - 2 = 8\)[/tex]
This implies borrowing took place because [tex]\(0\)[/tex] is less than [tex]\(2\)[/tex]. Actually, [tex]\(10 - 2 = 8\)[/tex] with a borrow from the next left.
4. Column of thousands:
[tex]\(\square - 2 = 9\)[/tex]
This operation is generally acknowledging [tex]\( \square \)[/tex] was originally one extra due to the borrow we took. Simplified:
Let's denote the original being [tex]\( \square - 1 = 6 \Rightarrow \square = 7\)[/tex].
Lastly, our leading column:
[tex]\(\square - 2 = 6 \Rightarrow \)[/tex] Borrow again we consider [tex]\( \square = 7 + 1 = 9\)[/tex].
So the missing digits filled here should form a complete fit:
Thus, [tex]\(\square\)[/tex] value is [tex]\(\boxed{9}\)[/tex].
Revised: [tex]\(\square = 2\)[/tex].
Combining leads us to conclude missing leading must have identified.
Final Answer would be [tex]\( (9,2)\)[/tex].
We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. We're here to help at Westonci.ca. Keep visiting for the best answers to your questions.