Westonci.ca is your trusted source for accurate answers to all your questions. Join our community and start learning today! Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.
Sagot :
To determine whether Ramesh is correct about [tex]\( 7^{-5} \)[/tex], let's break down the calculation and understand the true value of [tex]\( 7^{-5} \)[/tex].
We are given the information that as the exponent decreases, the value is divided by 7. This pattern aligns with the rules of exponents for negative powers of a number.
Firstly, let's determine the true value of [tex]\( 7^{-5} \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 7^{-5} = \frac{1}{7^5} \][/tex]
Let's calculate [tex]\( 7^5 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 7^5 = 7 \times 7 \times 7 \times 7 \times 7 = 16807 \][/tex]
Thus,
[tex]\[ 7^{-5} = \frac{1}{16807} \][/tex]
The numerical value of [tex]\(\frac{1}{16807}\)[/tex] can be approximated and it is:
[tex]\[ 7^{-5} \approx 5.9499018266198606 \times 10^{-5} \][/tex]
Now let's evaluate each statement provided in the question:
1. Ramesh is correct because [tex]\(7^{-5}\)[/tex] is equivalent to [tex]\(-7 \cdot (-7) \cdot (-7) \cdot (-7) \cdot (-7)\)[/tex], which has the same value as [tex]\(-16,807\)[/tex].
This statement is incorrect for several reasons:
- [tex]\( 7^{-5} \)[/tex] represents the reciprocal of [tex]\( 7^5 \)[/tex], not a series of multiplications involving negative sevens.
- [tex]\(-7 \cdot (-7) \cdot (-7) \cdot (-7) \cdot (-7)\)[/tex] would actually result in [tex]\(7^5 = 16807 \)[/tex] because multiplying an odd number of negative numbers still results in a negative number but not the correct context for reciprocal values.
2. Ramesh is correct because as the exponents decrease, the previous value is divided by 7, so [tex]\( 7^{-5} = 1 \div 7 \div 7 + 7 + 7 + 7 = -16,807 \)[/tex].
This statement is incorrect:
- While it is true that decreasing the exponent divides the previous value by 7, the arithmetic shown here mixes division and addition inappropriately to arrive at -16807, which is incorrect.
3. Ramesh is not correct because [tex]\( 7^{-5} \)[/tex] is equivalent to [tex]\(\frac{1}{7^5}\)[/tex], which has the same value as [tex]\(\frac{1}{7^4} \div 7 = \frac{1}{7^3} = \frac{1}{343}\)[/tex].
This statement is also incorrect:
- The correct relationship should be [tex]\( 7^{-5} = \frac{1}{7^5} \neq \frac{1}{7^4} \div 7 \)[/tex].
4. Ramesh is not correct because as the exponents decrease, the previous value is divided by 7, so [tex]\( 7^{-5} = 1 + 7 + 7 + 7 + 7 + 7 = \frac{1}{16807} \)[/tex].
This statement is part correct but contains errors:
- The reasoning behind decreased exponents involving division by 7 is correct, but the addition part is incorrect.
- However, it accurately specifies the correct final result [tex]\( \frac{1}{16807} \)[/tex].
Given the assessed calculations, the accurate statement should focus on the definition of [tex]\( 7^{-5} \)[/tex] as the reciprocal of [tex]\( 7^5 \)[/tex]:
Ramesh is not correct because [tex]\(7^{-5}\)[/tex] is equivalent to [tex]\(\frac{1}{7^5}\)[/tex], which has a value of approximately [tex]\(5.9499018266198606 \times 10^{-5}\)[/tex], not [tex]\(-16,807\)[/tex].
We are given the information that as the exponent decreases, the value is divided by 7. This pattern aligns with the rules of exponents for negative powers of a number.
Firstly, let's determine the true value of [tex]\( 7^{-5} \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 7^{-5} = \frac{1}{7^5} \][/tex]
Let's calculate [tex]\( 7^5 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 7^5 = 7 \times 7 \times 7 \times 7 \times 7 = 16807 \][/tex]
Thus,
[tex]\[ 7^{-5} = \frac{1}{16807} \][/tex]
The numerical value of [tex]\(\frac{1}{16807}\)[/tex] can be approximated and it is:
[tex]\[ 7^{-5} \approx 5.9499018266198606 \times 10^{-5} \][/tex]
Now let's evaluate each statement provided in the question:
1. Ramesh is correct because [tex]\(7^{-5}\)[/tex] is equivalent to [tex]\(-7 \cdot (-7) \cdot (-7) \cdot (-7) \cdot (-7)\)[/tex], which has the same value as [tex]\(-16,807\)[/tex].
This statement is incorrect for several reasons:
- [tex]\( 7^{-5} \)[/tex] represents the reciprocal of [tex]\( 7^5 \)[/tex], not a series of multiplications involving negative sevens.
- [tex]\(-7 \cdot (-7) \cdot (-7) \cdot (-7) \cdot (-7)\)[/tex] would actually result in [tex]\(7^5 = 16807 \)[/tex] because multiplying an odd number of negative numbers still results in a negative number but not the correct context for reciprocal values.
2. Ramesh is correct because as the exponents decrease, the previous value is divided by 7, so [tex]\( 7^{-5} = 1 \div 7 \div 7 + 7 + 7 + 7 = -16,807 \)[/tex].
This statement is incorrect:
- While it is true that decreasing the exponent divides the previous value by 7, the arithmetic shown here mixes division and addition inappropriately to arrive at -16807, which is incorrect.
3. Ramesh is not correct because [tex]\( 7^{-5} \)[/tex] is equivalent to [tex]\(\frac{1}{7^5}\)[/tex], which has the same value as [tex]\(\frac{1}{7^4} \div 7 = \frac{1}{7^3} = \frac{1}{343}\)[/tex].
This statement is also incorrect:
- The correct relationship should be [tex]\( 7^{-5} = \frac{1}{7^5} \neq \frac{1}{7^4} \div 7 \)[/tex].
4. Ramesh is not correct because as the exponents decrease, the previous value is divided by 7, so [tex]\( 7^{-5} = 1 + 7 + 7 + 7 + 7 + 7 = \frac{1}{16807} \)[/tex].
This statement is part correct but contains errors:
- The reasoning behind decreased exponents involving division by 7 is correct, but the addition part is incorrect.
- However, it accurately specifies the correct final result [tex]\( \frac{1}{16807} \)[/tex].
Given the assessed calculations, the accurate statement should focus on the definition of [tex]\( 7^{-5} \)[/tex] as the reciprocal of [tex]\( 7^5 \)[/tex]:
Ramesh is not correct because [tex]\(7^{-5}\)[/tex] is equivalent to [tex]\(\frac{1}{7^5}\)[/tex], which has a value of approximately [tex]\(5.9499018266198606 \times 10^{-5}\)[/tex], not [tex]\(-16,807\)[/tex].
Thanks for using our service. We aim to provide the most accurate answers for all your queries. Visit us again for more insights. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.
