At Westonci.ca, we provide reliable answers to your questions from a community of experts. Start exploring today! Explore thousands of questions and answers from knowledgeable experts in various fields on our Q&A platform. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.

Select the correct answer.

As a result of changing sales figures, a company increased the size of its workforce very quickly at first and then more slowly, as shown in the table below.

| Years After Opening | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
|-----------------------|----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|
| Number of Employees | 100| 348 | 405 | 575 | 654 | 704 | 746 |

Which type of function best models the data?

A. a square root function
B. a quadratic function with a negative value of a
C. a linear function with a positive slope
D. a quadratic function with a positive value of a


Sagot :

To determine the type of function that best models the data of the company's workforce growth, let's analyze the given information step by step.

1. Construct the Differences Between Consecutive Years:
Calculate the differences between the number of employees for consecutive years to understand the growth pattern.

[tex]\[ \begin{array}{c|c} \text{Years} & \text{Difference} \\ \hline 2-1 & 348 - 100 = 248 \\ 3-2 & 405 - 348 = 57 \\ 4-3 & 575 - 405 = 170 \\ 5-4 & 654 - 575 = 79 \\ 6-5 & 704 - 654 = 50 \\ 7-6 & 746 - 704 = 42 \\ \end{array} \][/tex]

So the differences between consecutive years are:
[tex]\[ [248, 57, 170, 79, 50, 42] \][/tex]

2. Construct the Second Differences (Differences of Differences):
Calculate the differences between consecutive differences to understand if the change is consistent (indicative of a quadratic function).

[tex]\[ \begin{array}{c|c} \text{Years} & \text{Second Difference} \\ \hline 3-2 & 57 - 248 = -191 \\ 4-3 & 170 - 57 = 113 \\ 5-4 & 79 - 170 = -91 \\ 6-5 & 50 - 79 = -29 \\ 7-6 & 42 - 50 = -8 \\ \end{array} \][/tex]

So the second differences are:
[tex]\[ [-191, 113, -91, -29, -8] \][/tex]

3. Evaluate Consistency of Second Differences:
For the data to be modeled well by a quadratic function, the second differences should be consistent.

Given:
[tex]\[ [-191, 113, -91, -29, -8] \][/tex]
The second differences are not consistent, suggesting that the function might not be a pure quadratic function straightforwardly.

4. Choosing the Best Function Model:
- A (Square Root Function): Typically involves a slower growth initially followed by faster growth, which doesn't fit our data.
- B (Quadratic Function with Negative [tex]\(a\)[/tex]): This would suggest the number of employees might eventually decrease, which isn't supported by our data.
- C (Linear Function with Positive Slope): Linear functions imply equal increments year over year, which isn’t the case here as the differences fluctuate considerably.
- D (Quadratic Function with Positive [tex]\(a\)[/tex]): Despite the second differences not being perfectly consistent, we observed that the rate of change is initially rapid and then slows down, a behavior characteristic of a quadratic function with a positive value of [tex]\(a\)[/tex].

Upon considering all these points, the type of function that best fits the data is:

[tex]\[ \boxed{D \text{. a quadratic function with a positive value of } a} \][/tex]