Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where our expert community is always ready to help with accurate information. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.
Sagot :
To determine which of the given piecewise relations defines a function, let's analyze each case.
Relation 1:
[tex]\[y = \left\{ \begin{array}{cl} x^2, & x < -2 \\ 0, & -2 \leq x \leq 4 \\ -x^2, & x \geq 4 \end{array} \right.\][/tex]
We need to check the values at the boundaries of each interval:
- For [tex]\(x = -2\)[/tex]:
- In the first interval: [tex]\(x < -2 \Rightarrow x^2\)[/tex]
- In the second interval: [tex]\(-2 \leq x \leq 4 \Rightarrow 0\)[/tex]
Clearly, at [tex]\(x = -2\)[/tex], [tex]\(y\)[/tex] takes the value [tex]\(0\)[/tex]. This is consistent.
- For [tex]\(x = 4\)[/tex]:
- In the second interval: [tex]\(-2 \leq x \leq 4 \Rightarrow 0\)[/tex]
- In the third interval: [tex]\(x \geq 4 \Rightarrow -x^2\)[/tex]
At [tex]\(x = 4\)[/tex], the value of [tex]\(y\)[/tex] should be:
- [tex]\(0\)[/tex] from the second interval,
- [tex]\(-16\)[/tex] from the third interval.
Since [tex]\(y\)[/tex] takes different values [tex]\(0\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-16\)[/tex] at [tex]\(x = 4\)[/tex], this relation is not a function.
Relation 2:
[tex]\[y = \left\{ \begin{array}{cl} x^2, & x \leq -2 \\ 4, & -2 < x \leq 2 \\ x^2 + 1, & x \geq 2 \end{array} \right.\][/tex]
Check the values at the boundaries of each interval:
- For [tex]\(x = -2\)[/tex]:
- In the first interval: [tex]\(x \leq -2 \Rightarrow x^2\)[/tex]
- In the second interval: [tex]\(-2 < x \leq 2 \Rightarrow 4\)[/tex]
At [tex]\(x = -2\)[/tex], the value of [tex]\(y\)[/tex] should be:
- [tex]\(4\)[/tex] from the second interval,
- [tex]\((-2)^2 = 4\)[/tex] from the first interval.
So, [tex]\(y = 4\)[/tex] at [tex]\(x = -2\)[/tex] in both cases. This is consistent.
- For [tex]\(x = 2\)[/tex]:
- In the second interval: [tex]\(-2 < x \leq 2 \Rightarrow 4\)[/tex]
- In the third interval: [tex]\(x \geq 2 \Rightarrow x^2 + 1\)[/tex]
At [tex]\(x = 2\)[/tex], the value of [tex]\(y\)[/tex] should be:
- [tex]\(4\)[/tex] from the second interval,
- [tex]\(2^2 + 1 = 5\)[/tex] from the third interval.
Since [tex]\(y\)[/tex] takes different values [tex]\(4\)[/tex] and [tex]\(5\)[/tex] at [tex]\(x = 2\)[/tex], this relation is not a function.
Relation 3:
[tex]\[y = \left\{ \begin{aligned} -3x, & \quad x < -2 \\ 3, & \quad 0 \leq x < 4 \\ 2x, & \quad x \geq 4 \end{aligned} \right.\][/tex]
Check the boundaries of each interval:
- For [tex]\(x = -2\)[/tex]:
- In the first interval: [tex]\(x < -2 \Rightarrow -3x\)[/tex]
Since [tex]\(-2\)[/tex] is not included in any interval, there is no issue at [tex]\(-2\)[/tex].
- For [tex]\(x = 0\)[/tex]:
- Not included in [tex]\(x < -2\)[/tex]
- In the second interval: [tex]\(0 \leq x < 4 \Rightarrow 3\)[/tex]
- Not included in [tex]\(x \geq 4\)[/tex]
Since [tex]\(0\)[/tex] is only included once, [tex]\(y\)[/tex] takes a unique value [tex]\(3\)[/tex], which is consistent.
- For [tex]\(x = 4\)[/tex]:
- Not included in [tex]\(x < -2\)[/tex]
- In the second interval: [tex]\(0 \leq x < 4 \Rightarrow 3\)[/tex]
- In the third interval: [tex]\(x \geq 4 \Rightarrow 2x\)[/tex]
At [tex]\(x = 4\)[/tex], the value of [tex]\(y\)[/tex] should be:
- [tex]\(3\)[/tex] from the second interval,
- [tex]\(8\)[/tex] from the third interval.
Since [tex]\(y\)[/tex] takes different values [tex]\(3\)[/tex] and [tex]\(8\)[/tex], this relation is not a function.
Relation 4:
[tex]\[y = \left\{ \begin{aligned} -3x, & \quad x \leq -4 \\ 3, & \quad -5 < x < 1 \end{aligned} \right.\][/tex]
Check the boundaries of each interval:
- For [tex]\(x = -4\)[/tex]:
- In the first interval: [tex]\(x \leq -4 \Rightarrow -3x\)[/tex]
- In the second interval: [tex]\(-5 < x < 1 \Rightarrow 3\)[/tex]
At [tex]\(x = -4\)[/tex], the value of [tex]\(y\)[/tex] should be:
- [tex]\( -3(-4) = 12\)[/tex]
- Not included in the second interval.
Thus, this relation defines two different values at [tex]\(x = -4\)[/tex] and is not a function.
Since none of these piecewise relations fit the criteria to define a consistent function, the final conclusion is that none of them define a function.
Relation 1:
[tex]\[y = \left\{ \begin{array}{cl} x^2, & x < -2 \\ 0, & -2 \leq x \leq 4 \\ -x^2, & x \geq 4 \end{array} \right.\][/tex]
We need to check the values at the boundaries of each interval:
- For [tex]\(x = -2\)[/tex]:
- In the first interval: [tex]\(x < -2 \Rightarrow x^2\)[/tex]
- In the second interval: [tex]\(-2 \leq x \leq 4 \Rightarrow 0\)[/tex]
Clearly, at [tex]\(x = -2\)[/tex], [tex]\(y\)[/tex] takes the value [tex]\(0\)[/tex]. This is consistent.
- For [tex]\(x = 4\)[/tex]:
- In the second interval: [tex]\(-2 \leq x \leq 4 \Rightarrow 0\)[/tex]
- In the third interval: [tex]\(x \geq 4 \Rightarrow -x^2\)[/tex]
At [tex]\(x = 4\)[/tex], the value of [tex]\(y\)[/tex] should be:
- [tex]\(0\)[/tex] from the second interval,
- [tex]\(-16\)[/tex] from the third interval.
Since [tex]\(y\)[/tex] takes different values [tex]\(0\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-16\)[/tex] at [tex]\(x = 4\)[/tex], this relation is not a function.
Relation 2:
[tex]\[y = \left\{ \begin{array}{cl} x^2, & x \leq -2 \\ 4, & -2 < x \leq 2 \\ x^2 + 1, & x \geq 2 \end{array} \right.\][/tex]
Check the values at the boundaries of each interval:
- For [tex]\(x = -2\)[/tex]:
- In the first interval: [tex]\(x \leq -2 \Rightarrow x^2\)[/tex]
- In the second interval: [tex]\(-2 < x \leq 2 \Rightarrow 4\)[/tex]
At [tex]\(x = -2\)[/tex], the value of [tex]\(y\)[/tex] should be:
- [tex]\(4\)[/tex] from the second interval,
- [tex]\((-2)^2 = 4\)[/tex] from the first interval.
So, [tex]\(y = 4\)[/tex] at [tex]\(x = -2\)[/tex] in both cases. This is consistent.
- For [tex]\(x = 2\)[/tex]:
- In the second interval: [tex]\(-2 < x \leq 2 \Rightarrow 4\)[/tex]
- In the third interval: [tex]\(x \geq 2 \Rightarrow x^2 + 1\)[/tex]
At [tex]\(x = 2\)[/tex], the value of [tex]\(y\)[/tex] should be:
- [tex]\(4\)[/tex] from the second interval,
- [tex]\(2^2 + 1 = 5\)[/tex] from the third interval.
Since [tex]\(y\)[/tex] takes different values [tex]\(4\)[/tex] and [tex]\(5\)[/tex] at [tex]\(x = 2\)[/tex], this relation is not a function.
Relation 3:
[tex]\[y = \left\{ \begin{aligned} -3x, & \quad x < -2 \\ 3, & \quad 0 \leq x < 4 \\ 2x, & \quad x \geq 4 \end{aligned} \right.\][/tex]
Check the boundaries of each interval:
- For [tex]\(x = -2\)[/tex]:
- In the first interval: [tex]\(x < -2 \Rightarrow -3x\)[/tex]
Since [tex]\(-2\)[/tex] is not included in any interval, there is no issue at [tex]\(-2\)[/tex].
- For [tex]\(x = 0\)[/tex]:
- Not included in [tex]\(x < -2\)[/tex]
- In the second interval: [tex]\(0 \leq x < 4 \Rightarrow 3\)[/tex]
- Not included in [tex]\(x \geq 4\)[/tex]
Since [tex]\(0\)[/tex] is only included once, [tex]\(y\)[/tex] takes a unique value [tex]\(3\)[/tex], which is consistent.
- For [tex]\(x = 4\)[/tex]:
- Not included in [tex]\(x < -2\)[/tex]
- In the second interval: [tex]\(0 \leq x < 4 \Rightarrow 3\)[/tex]
- In the third interval: [tex]\(x \geq 4 \Rightarrow 2x\)[/tex]
At [tex]\(x = 4\)[/tex], the value of [tex]\(y\)[/tex] should be:
- [tex]\(3\)[/tex] from the second interval,
- [tex]\(8\)[/tex] from the third interval.
Since [tex]\(y\)[/tex] takes different values [tex]\(3\)[/tex] and [tex]\(8\)[/tex], this relation is not a function.
Relation 4:
[tex]\[y = \left\{ \begin{aligned} -3x, & \quad x \leq -4 \\ 3, & \quad -5 < x < 1 \end{aligned} \right.\][/tex]
Check the boundaries of each interval:
- For [tex]\(x = -4\)[/tex]:
- In the first interval: [tex]\(x \leq -4 \Rightarrow -3x\)[/tex]
- In the second interval: [tex]\(-5 < x < 1 \Rightarrow 3\)[/tex]
At [tex]\(x = -4\)[/tex], the value of [tex]\(y\)[/tex] should be:
- [tex]\( -3(-4) = 12\)[/tex]
- Not included in the second interval.
Thus, this relation defines two different values at [tex]\(x = -4\)[/tex] and is not a function.
Since none of these piecewise relations fit the criteria to define a consistent function, the final conclusion is that none of them define a function.
Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.