Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions are answered by a community of knowledgeable contributors. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.
Sagot :
To determine which of the given piecewise relations defines a function, let's analyze each case.
Relation 1:
[tex]\[y = \left\{ \begin{array}{cl} x^2, & x < -2 \\ 0, & -2 \leq x \leq 4 \\ -x^2, & x \geq 4 \end{array} \right.\][/tex]
We need to check the values at the boundaries of each interval:
- For [tex]\(x = -2\)[/tex]:
- In the first interval: [tex]\(x < -2 \Rightarrow x^2\)[/tex]
- In the second interval: [tex]\(-2 \leq x \leq 4 \Rightarrow 0\)[/tex]
Clearly, at [tex]\(x = -2\)[/tex], [tex]\(y\)[/tex] takes the value [tex]\(0\)[/tex]. This is consistent.
- For [tex]\(x = 4\)[/tex]:
- In the second interval: [tex]\(-2 \leq x \leq 4 \Rightarrow 0\)[/tex]
- In the third interval: [tex]\(x \geq 4 \Rightarrow -x^2\)[/tex]
At [tex]\(x = 4\)[/tex], the value of [tex]\(y\)[/tex] should be:
- [tex]\(0\)[/tex] from the second interval,
- [tex]\(-16\)[/tex] from the third interval.
Since [tex]\(y\)[/tex] takes different values [tex]\(0\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-16\)[/tex] at [tex]\(x = 4\)[/tex], this relation is not a function.
Relation 2:
[tex]\[y = \left\{ \begin{array}{cl} x^2, & x \leq -2 \\ 4, & -2 < x \leq 2 \\ x^2 + 1, & x \geq 2 \end{array} \right.\][/tex]
Check the values at the boundaries of each interval:
- For [tex]\(x = -2\)[/tex]:
- In the first interval: [tex]\(x \leq -2 \Rightarrow x^2\)[/tex]
- In the second interval: [tex]\(-2 < x \leq 2 \Rightarrow 4\)[/tex]
At [tex]\(x = -2\)[/tex], the value of [tex]\(y\)[/tex] should be:
- [tex]\(4\)[/tex] from the second interval,
- [tex]\((-2)^2 = 4\)[/tex] from the first interval.
So, [tex]\(y = 4\)[/tex] at [tex]\(x = -2\)[/tex] in both cases. This is consistent.
- For [tex]\(x = 2\)[/tex]:
- In the second interval: [tex]\(-2 < x \leq 2 \Rightarrow 4\)[/tex]
- In the third interval: [tex]\(x \geq 2 \Rightarrow x^2 + 1\)[/tex]
At [tex]\(x = 2\)[/tex], the value of [tex]\(y\)[/tex] should be:
- [tex]\(4\)[/tex] from the second interval,
- [tex]\(2^2 + 1 = 5\)[/tex] from the third interval.
Since [tex]\(y\)[/tex] takes different values [tex]\(4\)[/tex] and [tex]\(5\)[/tex] at [tex]\(x = 2\)[/tex], this relation is not a function.
Relation 3:
[tex]\[y = \left\{ \begin{aligned} -3x, & \quad x < -2 \\ 3, & \quad 0 \leq x < 4 \\ 2x, & \quad x \geq 4 \end{aligned} \right.\][/tex]
Check the boundaries of each interval:
- For [tex]\(x = -2\)[/tex]:
- In the first interval: [tex]\(x < -2 \Rightarrow -3x\)[/tex]
Since [tex]\(-2\)[/tex] is not included in any interval, there is no issue at [tex]\(-2\)[/tex].
- For [tex]\(x = 0\)[/tex]:
- Not included in [tex]\(x < -2\)[/tex]
- In the second interval: [tex]\(0 \leq x < 4 \Rightarrow 3\)[/tex]
- Not included in [tex]\(x \geq 4\)[/tex]
Since [tex]\(0\)[/tex] is only included once, [tex]\(y\)[/tex] takes a unique value [tex]\(3\)[/tex], which is consistent.
- For [tex]\(x = 4\)[/tex]:
- Not included in [tex]\(x < -2\)[/tex]
- In the second interval: [tex]\(0 \leq x < 4 \Rightarrow 3\)[/tex]
- In the third interval: [tex]\(x \geq 4 \Rightarrow 2x\)[/tex]
At [tex]\(x = 4\)[/tex], the value of [tex]\(y\)[/tex] should be:
- [tex]\(3\)[/tex] from the second interval,
- [tex]\(8\)[/tex] from the third interval.
Since [tex]\(y\)[/tex] takes different values [tex]\(3\)[/tex] and [tex]\(8\)[/tex], this relation is not a function.
Relation 4:
[tex]\[y = \left\{ \begin{aligned} -3x, & \quad x \leq -4 \\ 3, & \quad -5 < x < 1 \end{aligned} \right.\][/tex]
Check the boundaries of each interval:
- For [tex]\(x = -4\)[/tex]:
- In the first interval: [tex]\(x \leq -4 \Rightarrow -3x\)[/tex]
- In the second interval: [tex]\(-5 < x < 1 \Rightarrow 3\)[/tex]
At [tex]\(x = -4\)[/tex], the value of [tex]\(y\)[/tex] should be:
- [tex]\( -3(-4) = 12\)[/tex]
- Not included in the second interval.
Thus, this relation defines two different values at [tex]\(x = -4\)[/tex] and is not a function.
Since none of these piecewise relations fit the criteria to define a consistent function, the final conclusion is that none of them define a function.
Relation 1:
[tex]\[y = \left\{ \begin{array}{cl} x^2, & x < -2 \\ 0, & -2 \leq x \leq 4 \\ -x^2, & x \geq 4 \end{array} \right.\][/tex]
We need to check the values at the boundaries of each interval:
- For [tex]\(x = -2\)[/tex]:
- In the first interval: [tex]\(x < -2 \Rightarrow x^2\)[/tex]
- In the second interval: [tex]\(-2 \leq x \leq 4 \Rightarrow 0\)[/tex]
Clearly, at [tex]\(x = -2\)[/tex], [tex]\(y\)[/tex] takes the value [tex]\(0\)[/tex]. This is consistent.
- For [tex]\(x = 4\)[/tex]:
- In the second interval: [tex]\(-2 \leq x \leq 4 \Rightarrow 0\)[/tex]
- In the third interval: [tex]\(x \geq 4 \Rightarrow -x^2\)[/tex]
At [tex]\(x = 4\)[/tex], the value of [tex]\(y\)[/tex] should be:
- [tex]\(0\)[/tex] from the second interval,
- [tex]\(-16\)[/tex] from the third interval.
Since [tex]\(y\)[/tex] takes different values [tex]\(0\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-16\)[/tex] at [tex]\(x = 4\)[/tex], this relation is not a function.
Relation 2:
[tex]\[y = \left\{ \begin{array}{cl} x^2, & x \leq -2 \\ 4, & -2 < x \leq 2 \\ x^2 + 1, & x \geq 2 \end{array} \right.\][/tex]
Check the values at the boundaries of each interval:
- For [tex]\(x = -2\)[/tex]:
- In the first interval: [tex]\(x \leq -2 \Rightarrow x^2\)[/tex]
- In the second interval: [tex]\(-2 < x \leq 2 \Rightarrow 4\)[/tex]
At [tex]\(x = -2\)[/tex], the value of [tex]\(y\)[/tex] should be:
- [tex]\(4\)[/tex] from the second interval,
- [tex]\((-2)^2 = 4\)[/tex] from the first interval.
So, [tex]\(y = 4\)[/tex] at [tex]\(x = -2\)[/tex] in both cases. This is consistent.
- For [tex]\(x = 2\)[/tex]:
- In the second interval: [tex]\(-2 < x \leq 2 \Rightarrow 4\)[/tex]
- In the third interval: [tex]\(x \geq 2 \Rightarrow x^2 + 1\)[/tex]
At [tex]\(x = 2\)[/tex], the value of [tex]\(y\)[/tex] should be:
- [tex]\(4\)[/tex] from the second interval,
- [tex]\(2^2 + 1 = 5\)[/tex] from the third interval.
Since [tex]\(y\)[/tex] takes different values [tex]\(4\)[/tex] and [tex]\(5\)[/tex] at [tex]\(x = 2\)[/tex], this relation is not a function.
Relation 3:
[tex]\[y = \left\{ \begin{aligned} -3x, & \quad x < -2 \\ 3, & \quad 0 \leq x < 4 \\ 2x, & \quad x \geq 4 \end{aligned} \right.\][/tex]
Check the boundaries of each interval:
- For [tex]\(x = -2\)[/tex]:
- In the first interval: [tex]\(x < -2 \Rightarrow -3x\)[/tex]
Since [tex]\(-2\)[/tex] is not included in any interval, there is no issue at [tex]\(-2\)[/tex].
- For [tex]\(x = 0\)[/tex]:
- Not included in [tex]\(x < -2\)[/tex]
- In the second interval: [tex]\(0 \leq x < 4 \Rightarrow 3\)[/tex]
- Not included in [tex]\(x \geq 4\)[/tex]
Since [tex]\(0\)[/tex] is only included once, [tex]\(y\)[/tex] takes a unique value [tex]\(3\)[/tex], which is consistent.
- For [tex]\(x = 4\)[/tex]:
- Not included in [tex]\(x < -2\)[/tex]
- In the second interval: [tex]\(0 \leq x < 4 \Rightarrow 3\)[/tex]
- In the third interval: [tex]\(x \geq 4 \Rightarrow 2x\)[/tex]
At [tex]\(x = 4\)[/tex], the value of [tex]\(y\)[/tex] should be:
- [tex]\(3\)[/tex] from the second interval,
- [tex]\(8\)[/tex] from the third interval.
Since [tex]\(y\)[/tex] takes different values [tex]\(3\)[/tex] and [tex]\(8\)[/tex], this relation is not a function.
Relation 4:
[tex]\[y = \left\{ \begin{aligned} -3x, & \quad x \leq -4 \\ 3, & \quad -5 < x < 1 \end{aligned} \right.\][/tex]
Check the boundaries of each interval:
- For [tex]\(x = -4\)[/tex]:
- In the first interval: [tex]\(x \leq -4 \Rightarrow -3x\)[/tex]
- In the second interval: [tex]\(-5 < x < 1 \Rightarrow 3\)[/tex]
At [tex]\(x = -4\)[/tex], the value of [tex]\(y\)[/tex] should be:
- [tex]\( -3(-4) = 12\)[/tex]
- Not included in the second interval.
Thus, this relation defines two different values at [tex]\(x = -4\)[/tex] and is not a function.
Since none of these piecewise relations fit the criteria to define a consistent function, the final conclusion is that none of them define a function.
Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.