Welcome to Westonci.ca, the ultimate question and answer platform. Get expert answers to your questions quickly and accurately. Discover in-depth solutions to your questions from a wide range of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.
Sagot :
Final answer:
The provided details showcase Henry's belief that civil interaction between the colonies and Great Britain is no longer viable due to futile hopes for reconciliation and the necessity of independence for peace.
Explanation:
The detail that advances Henry's claim that civil interaction between the colonies and Great Britain is no longer an option is:
- 'In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation.' - This statement conveys Henry's stance that hopes for peace are futile.
- 'And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves and the House.' - Henry questions the British ministry's actions, indicating a lack of trust in reconciliation.
- 'But the most powerful of all arguments, is, that nothing but independence, i.e., a continental form of government, can keep the peace of the continent and preserve it inviolate from civil wars.' - Henry argues that independence is crucial for maintaining peace.
Learn more about American Revolution and Independence here:
https://brainly.com/question/26395368
We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.