Westonci.ca is the premier destination for reliable answers to your questions, brought to you by a community of experts. Connect with a community of experts ready to help you find solutions to your questions quickly and accurately. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.

Kate was asked to compare the following fractions:

[tex]\[ \frac{3}{5} \quad \frac{3}{4} \quad \frac{2}{3} \][/tex]

Kate tried to write them all using a common denominator of 20. Explain what is wrong with her method.

Sagot :

Let's analyze the problem and explain why Kate's method is incorrect and how to properly find a common denominator for the fractions [tex]\(\frac{3}{5}\)[/tex], [tex]\(\frac{3}{4}\)[/tex], and [tex]\(\frac{2}{3}\)[/tex].

### Misstep in Choosing 20 as the Common Denominator

Firstly, Kate chose 20 as the common denominator. To understand why this choice is incorrect, we need to find a suitable common denominator that works for all given fractions. A common denominator must be a common multiple of all the denominators in the fractions.

The fractions given are:
[tex]\[ \frac{3}{5}, \frac{3}{4}, \frac{2}{3} \][/tex]

The denominators are 5, 4, and 3. To compare these fractions using a common denominator, we need the least common multiple (LCM) of these denominators.

### Finding the Least Common Multiple (LCM)

To find the LCM of 5, 4, and 3:

- The prime factorization of 5 is [tex]\(5\)[/tex].
- The prime factorization of 4 is [tex]\(2^2\)[/tex].
- The prime factorization of 3 is [tex]\(3\)[/tex].

To find the LCM, we take the highest power of each prime number that appears in these factorizations:

[tex]\[ \text{LCM} = 2^2 \times 3 \times 5 = 4 \times 3 \times 5 = 60 \][/tex]

Thus, the least common multiple of 5, 4, and 3 is 60, not 20. Therefore, 60 should be used as the common denominator.

### Converting Fractions to the Common Denominator

Now, we need to convert each fraction to have the common denominator of 60.

1. Convert [tex]\(\frac{3}{5}\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ \frac{3}{5} = \frac{3 \times 12}{5 \times 12} = \frac{36}{60} \][/tex]

2. Convert [tex]\(\frac{3}{4}\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ \frac{3}{4} = \frac{3 \times 15}{4 \times 15} = \frac{45}{60} \][/tex]

3. Convert [tex]\(\frac{2}{3}\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ \frac{2}{3} = \frac{2 \times 20}{3 \times 20} = \frac{40}{60} \][/tex]

So, the fractions converted to have a common denominator of 60 are:
[tex]\[ \frac{36}{60}, \frac{45}{60}, \frac{40}{60} \][/tex]

### Summary

Kate's method was incorrect because she used 20 as a common denominator, which is not a multiple of all the denominators involved. The correct common denominator should be 60, as it is the least common multiple of 5, 4, and 3. Using 60, the fractions [tex]\(\frac{3}{5}\)[/tex], [tex]\(\frac{3}{4}\)[/tex], and [tex]\(\frac{2}{3}\)[/tex] convert to [tex]\(\frac{36}{60}\)[/tex], [tex]\(\frac{45}{60}\)[/tex], and [tex]\(\frac{40}{60}\)[/tex] respectively.