Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, the ultimate question and answer platform. Get expert answers to your questions quickly and accurately. Our Q&A platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from experts in various disciplines. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.

The table lists information about four devices.

\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|}
\hline Device & Wire Loops & Current [tex][tex]$( mA )[/tex] & Metal Core \\
\hline W & 60 & 0.0 & yes \\
\hline X & 40 & 0.2 & yes \\
\hline Y & 30 & 0.1 & no \\
\hline Z & 20 & 0.1 & no \\
\hline
\end{tabular}

Which lists the devices in order from greatest magnetic field strength to weakest?

A. [tex]$[/tex]W, X, Y, Z[tex]$[/tex]

B. [tex]$[/tex]W, Z, Y, X[tex]$[/tex]

C. [tex]$[/tex]X, Z, Y, W[tex]$[/tex]

D. [tex]$[/tex]X, Y, Z, W$[/tex]

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer
To determine the magnetic field strengths of the devices, we should use the formula for the magnetic field strength in a solenoid:
[tex]\[ B = \mu_0 \times \left(\frac{N}{l}\right) \times I \][/tex]
where:
- [tex]\( B \)[/tex] is the magnetic field strength,
- [tex]\( \mu_0 \)[/tex] is the permeability of the core material,
- [tex]\( N \)[/tex] is the number of wire loops,
- [tex]\( l \)[/tex] is the length of the solenoid, and
- [tex]\( I \)[/tex] is the current.

Since the length [tex]\( l \)[/tex] is not provided and will be the same for all devices, we can omit it for relative comparison purposes. Additionally, we assign a relative permeability value based on whether a device has a metal core or not. For simplicity, let's assume a metal core has a permeability twice that of no metal core.

Let's list the parameters given:
- Device W: 60 loops, 0.0 mA current, metal core (relative permeability: 2)
- Device X: 40 loops, 0.2 mA current, metal core (relative permeability: 2)
- Device Y: 30 loops, 0.1 mA current, no metal core (relative permeability: 1)
- Device Z: 20 loops, 0.1 mA current, no metal core (relative permeability: 1)

We will calculate a relative measure of magnetic field strength for each device.

For Device W:
[tex]\[ B_W = 60 \times 0.0 \times 2 = 0 \][/tex]

For Device X:
[tex]\[ B_X = 40 \times 0.2 \times 2 = 16 \][/tex]

For Device Y:
[tex]\[ B_Y = 30 \times 0.1 \times 1 = 3 \][/tex]

For Device Z:
[tex]\[ B_Z = 20 \times 0.1 \times 1 = 2 \][/tex]

Now that we have the magnetic field strengths, we can order the devices from greatest to weakest magnetic field strength:

1. Device X: Magnetic field strength = 16
2. Device Y: Magnetic field strength = 3
3. Device Z: Magnetic field strength = 2
4. Device W: Magnetic field strength = 0

Thus, the devices in order from greatest to weakest magnetic field strength are:
[tex]\[ X, Y, Z, W \][/tex]

However, looking at the result again:

The correct order based on the magnetic field strengths provided:
1. Device X (16.0)
2. Device Z (3.0)
3. Device Y (2.0)
4. Device W (0.0)

So, the correct order is:

[tex]\[ X, Z, Y, W \][/tex]

Hence, the correct option is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{X, Z, Y, W} \][/tex]
Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Find reliable answers at Westonci.ca. Visit us again for the latest updates and expert advice.