At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the answers you need, thanks to our active and informed community. Discover the answers you need from a community of experts ready to help you with their knowledge and experience in various fields. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.
Sagot :
To determine which statement is logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] (if [tex]\( p \)[/tex] then [tex]\( q \)[/tex]), we need to identify the contrapositive of the given statement. The contrapositive of a conditional statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is logically equivalent to the original statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].
1. Given statements:
[tex]\( p \)[/tex]: Angles XYZ and RST are vertical angles.
[tex]\( q \)[/tex]: Angles XYZ and RST are congruent.
2. Original statement:
[tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]: If angles XYZ and RST are vertical angles, then they are congruent.
3. Contrapositive:
The contrapositive of [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is [tex]\( \neg q \rightarrow \neg p \)[/tex].
This means: If angles XYZ and RST are not congruent, then they are not vertical angles.
4. Analyzing each of the provided statements:
- Statement 1: If angles XYZ and RST are congruent, then they are vertical angles.
- This is the converse of the original statement (not equivalent).
- Statement 2: If angles XYZ and RST are not vertical angles, then they are not congruent.
- This is the inverse of the original statement (not equivalent).
- Statement 3: If angles XYZ and RST are not congruent, then they are not vertical angles.
- This is the contrapositive of the original statement (logically equivalent).
- Statement 4: If angles XYZ and RST are vertical angles, then they are not congruent.
- This statement is the negation of the original statement (not equivalent).
5. Conclusion:
The statement that is logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is: If angles XYZ and RST are not congruent, then they are not vertical angles.
Thus, the correct choice is statement 3.
1. Given statements:
[tex]\( p \)[/tex]: Angles XYZ and RST are vertical angles.
[tex]\( q \)[/tex]: Angles XYZ and RST are congruent.
2. Original statement:
[tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]: If angles XYZ and RST are vertical angles, then they are congruent.
3. Contrapositive:
The contrapositive of [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is [tex]\( \neg q \rightarrow \neg p \)[/tex].
This means: If angles XYZ and RST are not congruent, then they are not vertical angles.
4. Analyzing each of the provided statements:
- Statement 1: If angles XYZ and RST are congruent, then they are vertical angles.
- This is the converse of the original statement (not equivalent).
- Statement 2: If angles XYZ and RST are not vertical angles, then they are not congruent.
- This is the inverse of the original statement (not equivalent).
- Statement 3: If angles XYZ and RST are not congruent, then they are not vertical angles.
- This is the contrapositive of the original statement (logically equivalent).
- Statement 4: If angles XYZ and RST are vertical angles, then they are not congruent.
- This statement is the negation of the original statement (not equivalent).
5. Conclusion:
The statement that is logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is: If angles XYZ and RST are not congruent, then they are not vertical angles.
Thus, the correct choice is statement 3.
Thank you for visiting our platform. We hope you found the answers you were looking for. Come back anytime you need more information. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Find reliable answers at Westonci.ca. Visit us again for the latest updates and expert advice.