Find the best solutions to your questions at Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Connect with professionals on our platform to receive accurate answers to your questions quickly and efficiently. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.
Sagot :
To determine which statement is logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] (if [tex]\( p \)[/tex] then [tex]\( q \)[/tex]), we need to identify the contrapositive of the given statement. The contrapositive of a conditional statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is logically equivalent to the original statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].
1. Given statements:
[tex]\( p \)[/tex]: Angles XYZ and RST are vertical angles.
[tex]\( q \)[/tex]: Angles XYZ and RST are congruent.
2. Original statement:
[tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]: If angles XYZ and RST are vertical angles, then they are congruent.
3. Contrapositive:
The contrapositive of [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is [tex]\( \neg q \rightarrow \neg p \)[/tex].
This means: If angles XYZ and RST are not congruent, then they are not vertical angles.
4. Analyzing each of the provided statements:
- Statement 1: If angles XYZ and RST are congruent, then they are vertical angles.
- This is the converse of the original statement (not equivalent).
- Statement 2: If angles XYZ and RST are not vertical angles, then they are not congruent.
- This is the inverse of the original statement (not equivalent).
- Statement 3: If angles XYZ and RST are not congruent, then they are not vertical angles.
- This is the contrapositive of the original statement (logically equivalent).
- Statement 4: If angles XYZ and RST are vertical angles, then they are not congruent.
- This statement is the negation of the original statement (not equivalent).
5. Conclusion:
The statement that is logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is: If angles XYZ and RST are not congruent, then they are not vertical angles.
Thus, the correct choice is statement 3.
1. Given statements:
[tex]\( p \)[/tex]: Angles XYZ and RST are vertical angles.
[tex]\( q \)[/tex]: Angles XYZ and RST are congruent.
2. Original statement:
[tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]: If angles XYZ and RST are vertical angles, then they are congruent.
3. Contrapositive:
The contrapositive of [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is [tex]\( \neg q \rightarrow \neg p \)[/tex].
This means: If angles XYZ and RST are not congruent, then they are not vertical angles.
4. Analyzing each of the provided statements:
- Statement 1: If angles XYZ and RST are congruent, then they are vertical angles.
- This is the converse of the original statement (not equivalent).
- Statement 2: If angles XYZ and RST are not vertical angles, then they are not congruent.
- This is the inverse of the original statement (not equivalent).
- Statement 3: If angles XYZ and RST are not congruent, then they are not vertical angles.
- This is the contrapositive of the original statement (logically equivalent).
- Statement 4: If angles XYZ and RST are vertical angles, then they are not congruent.
- This statement is the negation of the original statement (not equivalent).
5. Conclusion:
The statement that is logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is: If angles XYZ and RST are not congruent, then they are not vertical angles.
Thus, the correct choice is statement 3.
Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. We're here to help at Westonci.ca. Keep visiting for the best answers to your questions.