Answered

Westonci.ca offers quick and accurate answers to your questions. Join our community and get the insights you need today. Discover a wealth of knowledge from experts across different disciplines on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.

Read the excerpt from The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone by James Cross Giblin:

"Some of these scholars made otherwise significant contributions to the world's knowledge of ancient Egypt. A German priest of the 1600s, Athanasius Kircher, wrote the first grammar and vocabulary of Coptic, the language of Christian Egypt. These books were to prove of great value when the hieroglyphs were eventually deciphered. But Kircher's ideas about the hieroglyphs themselves were even farther off the mark than those of Horapollo. Looking at a certain group of symbols—which actually stood for the name of a pharaoh—Kircher let his imagination run wild. Without any evidence to support him, he said that the hieroglyphs meant 'The blessings of the god Osiris are to be procured by means of sacred ceremonies, in order that the benefits of the river Nile may be obtained.'"

Which sentence from this excerpt contains evidence that supports the claim?

A. "But Kircher's ideas about the hieroglyphs themselves were even farther off the mark than those of Horapollo."
B. "A German priest of the 1600s, Athanasius Kircher, wrote the first grammar and vocabulary of Coptic, the language of Christian Egypt."
C. "Looking at a certain group of symbols—which actually stood for the name of a pharaoh—Kircher let his imagination run wild."
D. "Some of these scholars made otherwise significant contributions to the world's knowledge of ancient Egypt."

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

The sentence detailing Kircher's misinterpretation of symbols as referring to a pharaoh provides evidence supporting the claim of his inaccurate understanding of hieroglyphs.


Explanation:

The sentence that contains evidence supporting the claim is:

O Looking at a certain group of symbols-which actually stood for the name of a pharaoh-Kircher let his imagination run wild.

This sentence provides evidence of Kircher misinterpreting symbols as representing a pharaoh's name and then speculating wildly about their meaning, showcasing his inaccuracies in understanding hieroglyphs. Kircher's imaginative leap without factual support highlights the extent to which he was 'off the mark' in deciphering hieroglyphs. This example underscores the challenges faced by early scholars in decoding ancient Egyptian writing systems.

Learn more about Ancient Egypt here:

https://brainly.com/question/37031229


We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.