Answered

At Westonci.ca, we make it easy to get the answers you need from a community of informed and experienced contributors. Discover precise answers to your questions from a wide range of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.

Read the excerpt from The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone by James Cross Giblin:

"Some of these scholars made otherwise significant contributions to the world's knowledge of ancient Egypt. A German priest of the 1600s, Athanasius Kircher, wrote the first grammar and vocabulary of Coptic, the language of Christian Egypt. These books were to prove of great value when the hieroglyphs were eventually deciphered. But Kircher's ideas about the hieroglyphs themselves were even farther off the mark than those of Horapollo. Looking at a certain group of symbols—which actually stood for the name of a pharaoh—Kircher let his imagination run wild. Without any evidence to support him, he said that the hieroglyphs meant 'The blessings of the god Osiris are to be procured by means of sacred ceremonies, in order that the benefits of the river Nile may be obtained.'"

Which sentence from this excerpt contains evidence that supports the claim?

A. But Kircher's ideas about the hieroglyphs themselves were even farther off the mark than those of Horapollo.
B. A German priest of the 1600s, Athanasius Kircher, wrote the first grammar and vocabulary of Coptic, the language of Christian Egypt.
C. Looking at a certain group of symbols—which actually stood for the name of a pharaoh—Kircher let his imagination run wild.
D. Some of these scholars made otherwise significant contributions to the world's knowledge of ancient Egypt.


Sagot :

Final answer:

The sentence 'O Looking at a certain group of symbols-which actually stood for the name of a pharaoh-Kircher let his imagination run wild' contains evidence supporting the claim in the excerpt.


Explanation:

The sentence that contains evidence supporting the claim is: O Looking at a certain group of symbols-which actually stood for the name of a pharaoh-Kircher let his imagination run wild.

This sentence shows how Kircher misinterpreted hieroglyphs, attributing a different meaning based on his imagination rather than evidence.

This misinterpretation hindered the progress in deciphering hieroglyphs until later scholars like Champollion made significant advancements.


Learn more about Deciphering Hieroglyphs here:

https://brainly.com/question/17182840