Answered

At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the best answers from a community of experienced and knowledgeable individuals. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.

When attempting to establish causation from an observational study, which of the following is NOT a necessary consideration?

A. The alleged cause precedes the effect
B. The alleged cause is plausible
C. The explanatory and response variables are perfectly correlated (r = 1 or r = -1)

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Correlation in observational studies does not necessarily imply causation. Key considerations for establishing causation include the precedence of the alleged cause, plausibility, and nonspurious relationships.


Explanation:

Correlation in observational studies indicates an association between variables, but causation is more complex. To establish causation, the alleged cause must precede the effect in time, be plausible, and the relationship should be nonspurious. Correlation does not necessarily imply causation; alternative explanations must be considered.


Learn more about establishing causation from observational studies here:

https://brainly.com/question/33439395


Visit us again for up-to-date and reliable answers. We're always ready to assist you with your informational needs. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.