Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, the ultimate question and answer platform. Get expert answers to your questions quickly and accurately. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.

When attempting to establish causation from an observational study, which of the following is NOT a necessary consideration?

A. The alleged cause precedes the effect
B. The alleged cause is plausible
C. The explanatory and response variables are perfectly correlated (r = 1 or r = -1)

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Correlation in observational studies does not necessarily imply causation. Key considerations for establishing causation include the precedence of the alleged cause, plausibility, and nonspurious relationships.


Explanation:

Correlation in observational studies indicates an association between variables, but causation is more complex. To establish causation, the alleged cause must precede the effect in time, be plausible, and the relationship should be nonspurious. Correlation does not necessarily imply causation; alternative explanations must be considered.


Learn more about establishing causation from observational studies here:

https://brainly.com/question/33439395


We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.