Welcome to Westonci.ca, where finding answers to your questions is made simple by our community of experts. Ask your questions and receive detailed answers from professionals with extensive experience in various fields. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.
Sagot :
Sure, let's go through the step-by-step solution for this hypothesis test. Here's a detailed explanation:
### a. Stating the Hypotheses
We need to test the claim that the proportion of people over 55 who dream in black and white is greater than the proportion for those under 25.
- [tex]\( p_1 \)[/tex]: Proportion of people over the age of 55 who dream in black and white.
- [tex]\( p_2 \)[/tex]: Proportion of people under the age of 25 who dream in black and white.
The null and alternative hypotheses can be set as follows:
- Null hypothesis ([tex]\( H_0 \)[/tex]): [tex]\( p_1 \leq p_2 \)[/tex]
- Alternative hypothesis ([tex]\( H_1 \)[/tex]): [tex]\( p_1 > p_2 \)[/tex]
Therefore, the correct answer for the hypotheses is (A):
- [tex]\( H_0: p_1 \leq p_2 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( H_1: p_1 > p_2 \)[/tex]
### Test Statistic
The test statistic used for comparing proportions is calculated as a z-score.
Given:
- Sample size for people over 55 ([tex]\( n_1 \)[/tex]) = 295
- Sample size for people under 25 ([tex]\( n_2 \)[/tex]) = 290
- Number of people over 55 who dream in black and white ([tex]\( x_1 \)[/tex]) = 69
- Number of people under 25 who dream in black and white ([tex]\( x_2 \)[/tex]) = 11
The proportions are:
- [tex]\( \hat{p}_1 = \frac{69}{295} \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( \hat{p}_2 = \frac{11}{290} \)[/tex]
Next, we calculate the pooled proportion ([tex]\( \hat{p} \)[/tex]):
[tex]\[ \hat{p} = \frac{69 + 11}{295 + 290} = \frac{80}{585} \][/tex]
The standard error (SE) for the difference in proportions is:
[tex]\[ SE = \sqrt{\hat{p}(1 - \hat{p}) \left( \frac{1}{295} + \frac{1}{290} \right)} \][/tex]
The z-value (test statistic) is calculated as:
[tex]\[ z = \frac{\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2}{SE} \][/tex]
Based on the calculations (your result):
[tex]\[ z = 6.90 \][/tex]
### [tex]\( P \)[/tex]-value
To find the [tex]\( P \)[/tex]-value, we consider the fact that this is a one-tailed test (since [tex]\( H_1 \)[/tex] states [tex]\( p_1 > p_2 \)[/tex]).
Given:
[tex]\[ z = 6.90 \][/tex]
Using the cumulative distribution function (CDF) for the normal distribution to find the tail probability:
[tex]\[ P \text{-value} = 1 - \Phi(z) \][/tex]
Where [tex]\( \Phi(z) \)[/tex] is the standard normal cumulative distribution function.
For [tex]\( z = 6.90 \)[/tex], the [tex]\( P \)[/tex]-value is extremely small (close to 0) because it is highly significant.
Based on the calculations (your result):
[tex]\[ P \text{-value} = 0.000 \][/tex]
### Conclusion
Since the [tex]\( P \)[/tex]-value is less than the significance level ([tex]\( \alpha = 0.01 \)[/tex]), we reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the proportion of people over 55 who dream in black and white is greater than the proportion for those under 25.
### a. Stating the Hypotheses
We need to test the claim that the proportion of people over 55 who dream in black and white is greater than the proportion for those under 25.
- [tex]\( p_1 \)[/tex]: Proportion of people over the age of 55 who dream in black and white.
- [tex]\( p_2 \)[/tex]: Proportion of people under the age of 25 who dream in black and white.
The null and alternative hypotheses can be set as follows:
- Null hypothesis ([tex]\( H_0 \)[/tex]): [tex]\( p_1 \leq p_2 \)[/tex]
- Alternative hypothesis ([tex]\( H_1 \)[/tex]): [tex]\( p_1 > p_2 \)[/tex]
Therefore, the correct answer for the hypotheses is (A):
- [tex]\( H_0: p_1 \leq p_2 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( H_1: p_1 > p_2 \)[/tex]
### Test Statistic
The test statistic used for comparing proportions is calculated as a z-score.
Given:
- Sample size for people over 55 ([tex]\( n_1 \)[/tex]) = 295
- Sample size for people under 25 ([tex]\( n_2 \)[/tex]) = 290
- Number of people over 55 who dream in black and white ([tex]\( x_1 \)[/tex]) = 69
- Number of people under 25 who dream in black and white ([tex]\( x_2 \)[/tex]) = 11
The proportions are:
- [tex]\( \hat{p}_1 = \frac{69}{295} \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( \hat{p}_2 = \frac{11}{290} \)[/tex]
Next, we calculate the pooled proportion ([tex]\( \hat{p} \)[/tex]):
[tex]\[ \hat{p} = \frac{69 + 11}{295 + 290} = \frac{80}{585} \][/tex]
The standard error (SE) for the difference in proportions is:
[tex]\[ SE = \sqrt{\hat{p}(1 - \hat{p}) \left( \frac{1}{295} + \frac{1}{290} \right)} \][/tex]
The z-value (test statistic) is calculated as:
[tex]\[ z = \frac{\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2}{SE} \][/tex]
Based on the calculations (your result):
[tex]\[ z = 6.90 \][/tex]
### [tex]\( P \)[/tex]-value
To find the [tex]\( P \)[/tex]-value, we consider the fact that this is a one-tailed test (since [tex]\( H_1 \)[/tex] states [tex]\( p_1 > p_2 \)[/tex]).
Given:
[tex]\[ z = 6.90 \][/tex]
Using the cumulative distribution function (CDF) for the normal distribution to find the tail probability:
[tex]\[ P \text{-value} = 1 - \Phi(z) \][/tex]
Where [tex]\( \Phi(z) \)[/tex] is the standard normal cumulative distribution function.
For [tex]\( z = 6.90 \)[/tex], the [tex]\( P \)[/tex]-value is extremely small (close to 0) because it is highly significant.
Based on the calculations (your result):
[tex]\[ P \text{-value} = 0.000 \][/tex]
### Conclusion
Since the [tex]\( P \)[/tex]-value is less than the significance level ([tex]\( \alpha = 0.01 \)[/tex]), we reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the proportion of people over 55 who dream in black and white is greater than the proportion for those under 25.
Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.
