Welcome to Westonci.ca, where your questions are met with accurate answers from a community of experts and enthusiasts. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.
Sagot :
Sure, let's prove the given equation step-by-step:
Given:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \mu)^2 = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - n \mu^2 \][/tex]
Proof:
1. Expand the left-hand side (LHS):
Start with the expression [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \mu)^2\)[/tex].
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \mu)^2 \][/tex]
Using the binomial expansion, we can expand this to:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i^2 - 2x_i\mu + \mu^2) \][/tex]
Now, distribute the summation across the terms inside:
[tex]\[ = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - \sum_{i=1}^n 2x_i\mu + \sum_{i=1}^n \mu^2 \][/tex]
2. Simplify each term:
- [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2\)[/tex] remains as is.
- For the second term, factor out the constant [tex]\(2\mu\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ - \sum_{i=1}^n 2x_i\mu = -2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \][/tex]
- For the third term, [tex]\(\mu\)[/tex] is also a constant and can be treated as such:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n \mu^2 = \sum_{i=1}^n \mu \cdot \mu = \mu^2 \sum_{i=1}^n 1 = \mu^2 \cdot n \][/tex]
(since [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n 1\)[/tex] simply sums [tex]\(1\)[/tex] from [tex]\(1\)[/tex] to [tex]\(n\)[/tex], which equals [tex]\(n\)[/tex]).
This gives us:
[tex]\[ = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - 2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i + n\mu^2 \][/tex]
3. Relate to the right-hand side (RHS):
Recall we want to show this equals [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - n \mu^2\)[/tex].
- Notice that we can rewrite the expanded LHS (as calculated above) in terms of the known quantities:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - 2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i + n\mu^2 \][/tex]
- Recognize that the mean [tex]\(\mu\)[/tex] can be expressed as:
[tex]\[ \mu = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \][/tex]
- Substitute [tex]\(\mu\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ - 2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i = -2 \left( \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \right) \sum_{i=1}^n x_i = -2 \left( \frac{1}{n} (\sum_{i=1}^n x_i)^2 \right) = -\frac{2}{n} \left( \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \right)^2 \][/tex]
Which simplifies back to:
[tex]\[ -2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i = -2\mu n \mu = -2\mu^2 n \text{ (because } \mu = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}{n}) \][/tex]
4. Combine all terms:
Now, the LHS [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - 2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i + n\mu^2\)[/tex] can be seen as:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - 2n\mu^2 + n\mu^2 = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - n \mu^2 \][/tex]
Hence, this is equal to the RHS:
Therefore:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n\left(x_i - \mu\right)^2 = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - n \mu^2 \][/tex]
And the proof is complete!
Given:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \mu)^2 = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - n \mu^2 \][/tex]
Proof:
1. Expand the left-hand side (LHS):
Start with the expression [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \mu)^2\)[/tex].
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \mu)^2 \][/tex]
Using the binomial expansion, we can expand this to:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i^2 - 2x_i\mu + \mu^2) \][/tex]
Now, distribute the summation across the terms inside:
[tex]\[ = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - \sum_{i=1}^n 2x_i\mu + \sum_{i=1}^n \mu^2 \][/tex]
2. Simplify each term:
- [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2\)[/tex] remains as is.
- For the second term, factor out the constant [tex]\(2\mu\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ - \sum_{i=1}^n 2x_i\mu = -2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \][/tex]
- For the third term, [tex]\(\mu\)[/tex] is also a constant and can be treated as such:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n \mu^2 = \sum_{i=1}^n \mu \cdot \mu = \mu^2 \sum_{i=1}^n 1 = \mu^2 \cdot n \][/tex]
(since [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n 1\)[/tex] simply sums [tex]\(1\)[/tex] from [tex]\(1\)[/tex] to [tex]\(n\)[/tex], which equals [tex]\(n\)[/tex]).
This gives us:
[tex]\[ = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - 2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i + n\mu^2 \][/tex]
3. Relate to the right-hand side (RHS):
Recall we want to show this equals [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - n \mu^2\)[/tex].
- Notice that we can rewrite the expanded LHS (as calculated above) in terms of the known quantities:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - 2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i + n\mu^2 \][/tex]
- Recognize that the mean [tex]\(\mu\)[/tex] can be expressed as:
[tex]\[ \mu = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \][/tex]
- Substitute [tex]\(\mu\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ - 2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i = -2 \left( \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \right) \sum_{i=1}^n x_i = -2 \left( \frac{1}{n} (\sum_{i=1}^n x_i)^2 \right) = -\frac{2}{n} \left( \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \right)^2 \][/tex]
Which simplifies back to:
[tex]\[ -2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i = -2\mu n \mu = -2\mu^2 n \text{ (because } \mu = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}{n}) \][/tex]
4. Combine all terms:
Now, the LHS [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - 2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i + n\mu^2\)[/tex] can be seen as:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - 2n\mu^2 + n\mu^2 = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - n \mu^2 \][/tex]
Hence, this is equal to the RHS:
Therefore:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n\left(x_i - \mu\right)^2 = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - n \mu^2 \][/tex]
And the proof is complete!
We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed by returning for our latest expert advice.
