Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions find answers from a community of knowledgeable experts. Ask your questions and receive precise answers from experienced professionals across different disciplines. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.
Sagot :
Sure, let's prove the given equation step-by-step:
Given:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \mu)^2 = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - n \mu^2 \][/tex]
Proof:
1. Expand the left-hand side (LHS):
Start with the expression [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \mu)^2\)[/tex].
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \mu)^2 \][/tex]
Using the binomial expansion, we can expand this to:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i^2 - 2x_i\mu + \mu^2) \][/tex]
Now, distribute the summation across the terms inside:
[tex]\[ = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - \sum_{i=1}^n 2x_i\mu + \sum_{i=1}^n \mu^2 \][/tex]
2. Simplify each term:
- [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2\)[/tex] remains as is.
- For the second term, factor out the constant [tex]\(2\mu\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ - \sum_{i=1}^n 2x_i\mu = -2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \][/tex]
- For the third term, [tex]\(\mu\)[/tex] is also a constant and can be treated as such:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n \mu^2 = \sum_{i=1}^n \mu \cdot \mu = \mu^2 \sum_{i=1}^n 1 = \mu^2 \cdot n \][/tex]
(since [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n 1\)[/tex] simply sums [tex]\(1\)[/tex] from [tex]\(1\)[/tex] to [tex]\(n\)[/tex], which equals [tex]\(n\)[/tex]).
This gives us:
[tex]\[ = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - 2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i + n\mu^2 \][/tex]
3. Relate to the right-hand side (RHS):
Recall we want to show this equals [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - n \mu^2\)[/tex].
- Notice that we can rewrite the expanded LHS (as calculated above) in terms of the known quantities:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - 2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i + n\mu^2 \][/tex]
- Recognize that the mean [tex]\(\mu\)[/tex] can be expressed as:
[tex]\[ \mu = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \][/tex]
- Substitute [tex]\(\mu\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ - 2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i = -2 \left( \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \right) \sum_{i=1}^n x_i = -2 \left( \frac{1}{n} (\sum_{i=1}^n x_i)^2 \right) = -\frac{2}{n} \left( \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \right)^2 \][/tex]
Which simplifies back to:
[tex]\[ -2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i = -2\mu n \mu = -2\mu^2 n \text{ (because } \mu = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}{n}) \][/tex]
4. Combine all terms:
Now, the LHS [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - 2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i + n\mu^2\)[/tex] can be seen as:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - 2n\mu^2 + n\mu^2 = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - n \mu^2 \][/tex]
Hence, this is equal to the RHS:
Therefore:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n\left(x_i - \mu\right)^2 = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - n \mu^2 \][/tex]
And the proof is complete!
Given:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \mu)^2 = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - n \mu^2 \][/tex]
Proof:
1. Expand the left-hand side (LHS):
Start with the expression [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \mu)^2\)[/tex].
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \mu)^2 \][/tex]
Using the binomial expansion, we can expand this to:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i^2 - 2x_i\mu + \mu^2) \][/tex]
Now, distribute the summation across the terms inside:
[tex]\[ = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - \sum_{i=1}^n 2x_i\mu + \sum_{i=1}^n \mu^2 \][/tex]
2. Simplify each term:
- [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2\)[/tex] remains as is.
- For the second term, factor out the constant [tex]\(2\mu\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ - \sum_{i=1}^n 2x_i\mu = -2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \][/tex]
- For the third term, [tex]\(\mu\)[/tex] is also a constant and can be treated as such:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n \mu^2 = \sum_{i=1}^n \mu \cdot \mu = \mu^2 \sum_{i=1}^n 1 = \mu^2 \cdot n \][/tex]
(since [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n 1\)[/tex] simply sums [tex]\(1\)[/tex] from [tex]\(1\)[/tex] to [tex]\(n\)[/tex], which equals [tex]\(n\)[/tex]).
This gives us:
[tex]\[ = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - 2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i + n\mu^2 \][/tex]
3. Relate to the right-hand side (RHS):
Recall we want to show this equals [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - n \mu^2\)[/tex].
- Notice that we can rewrite the expanded LHS (as calculated above) in terms of the known quantities:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - 2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i + n\mu^2 \][/tex]
- Recognize that the mean [tex]\(\mu\)[/tex] can be expressed as:
[tex]\[ \mu = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \][/tex]
- Substitute [tex]\(\mu\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ - 2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i = -2 \left( \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \right) \sum_{i=1}^n x_i = -2 \left( \frac{1}{n} (\sum_{i=1}^n x_i)^2 \right) = -\frac{2}{n} \left( \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \right)^2 \][/tex]
Which simplifies back to:
[tex]\[ -2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i = -2\mu n \mu = -2\mu^2 n \text{ (because } \mu = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}{n}) \][/tex]
4. Combine all terms:
Now, the LHS [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - 2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i + n\mu^2\)[/tex] can be seen as:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - 2n\mu^2 + n\mu^2 = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - n \mu^2 \][/tex]
Hence, this is equal to the RHS:
Therefore:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n\left(x_i - \mu\right)^2 = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - n \mu^2 \][/tex]
And the proof is complete!
Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed with our latest expert advice.