Westonci.ca offers quick and accurate answers to your questions. Join our community and get the insights you need today. Explore thousands of questions and answers from knowledgeable experts in various fields on our Q&A platform. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.
Sagot :
To arrange the given decimals in order of size, from smallest to largest, let's compare their values step by step.
The given decimals are:
- 3.2
- 3.27
- 3.72
- 3.702
- 3.02
Step-by-step comparison:
1. 3.02 vs 3.2
- 3.02 is less than 3.2 because 02 is less than 20 in the hundredths place.
2. 3.02 vs 3.27
- 3.02 is less than 3.27 because 02 is less than 27 in the hundredths place.
3. 3.02 vs 3.72
- 3.02 is less than 3.72 because 02 is less than 72 in the hundredths place.
4. 3.02 vs 3.702
- 3.02 is less than 3.702 because 02 is less than 702 when comparing up to three decimal places.
Next, we know that 3.02 is the smallest number.
5. 3.2 vs 3.27
- 3.2 is less than 3.27 because 20 is less than 27 in the hundredths place.
6. 3.2 vs 3.72
- 3.2 is less than 3.72 because 20 is less than 72 in the hundredths place.
7. 3.2 vs 3.702
- 3.2 is less than 3.702 because comparing up to one decimal place, 2 is less than 7 when we consider the tenths place.
So next smallest number is 3.2.
8. 3.27 vs 3.72
- 3.27 is less than 3.72 because 27 is less than 72 in the hundredths place.
9. 3.27 vs 3.702
- 3.27 is less than 3.702 because comparing digit by digit in the hundredths place, 27 is less than 702.
This makes 3.27 the next smallest number.
10. 3.702 vs 3.72
- 3.702 is less than 3.72 because when we compare up to three decimal places, 702 is less than 720.
From the above comparisons, we find that the order of the decimals from smallest to largest is:
[tex]\[3.02, 3.2, 3.27, 3.702, 3.72\][/tex]
Therefore, writing the given decimals in order of size from smallest to largest we have:
[tex]\[3.02, 3.2, 3.27, 3.702, 3.72\][/tex]
The given decimals are:
- 3.2
- 3.27
- 3.72
- 3.702
- 3.02
Step-by-step comparison:
1. 3.02 vs 3.2
- 3.02 is less than 3.2 because 02 is less than 20 in the hundredths place.
2. 3.02 vs 3.27
- 3.02 is less than 3.27 because 02 is less than 27 in the hundredths place.
3. 3.02 vs 3.72
- 3.02 is less than 3.72 because 02 is less than 72 in the hundredths place.
4. 3.02 vs 3.702
- 3.02 is less than 3.702 because 02 is less than 702 when comparing up to three decimal places.
Next, we know that 3.02 is the smallest number.
5. 3.2 vs 3.27
- 3.2 is less than 3.27 because 20 is less than 27 in the hundredths place.
6. 3.2 vs 3.72
- 3.2 is less than 3.72 because 20 is less than 72 in the hundredths place.
7. 3.2 vs 3.702
- 3.2 is less than 3.702 because comparing up to one decimal place, 2 is less than 7 when we consider the tenths place.
So next smallest number is 3.2.
8. 3.27 vs 3.72
- 3.27 is less than 3.72 because 27 is less than 72 in the hundredths place.
9. 3.27 vs 3.702
- 3.27 is less than 3.702 because comparing digit by digit in the hundredths place, 27 is less than 702.
This makes 3.27 the next smallest number.
10. 3.702 vs 3.72
- 3.702 is less than 3.72 because when we compare up to three decimal places, 702 is less than 720.
From the above comparisons, we find that the order of the decimals from smallest to largest is:
[tex]\[3.02, 3.2, 3.27, 3.702, 3.72\][/tex]
Therefore, writing the given decimals in order of size from smallest to largest we have:
[tex]\[3.02, 3.2, 3.27, 3.702, 3.72\][/tex]
We hope this information was helpful. Feel free to return anytime for more answers to your questions and concerns. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.