Answered

Westonci.ca is the premier destination for reliable answers to your questions, brought to you by a community of experts. Our platform connects you with professionals ready to provide precise answers to all your questions in various areas of expertise. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.

Why are settlements in places with regular natural disasters controversial?

A. They refuse national rescue services when disasters strike.
B. Insurance costs tend to be lower in these areas.
C. Homes are priced at much higher rates in these areas.
D. Rebuilding is expensive and affects all individuals who pay taxes.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Settlements in disaster-prone areas are controversial due to financial impacts, disparities in recovery efforts, and challenges in incentivizing residents to live in safer zones.


Explanation:

Settlements in places with regular natural disasters are controversial due to various factors such as increased risk, financial impacts, inequalities, and social injustice. For instance, low-income households are often uninsured and struggle to recover financially from disasters, leading to disparities in recovery efforts. Moreover, the tension between creating disincentives for living in high-risk zones and supporting existing residents poses challenges in disaster-prone areas.


Learn more about natural disasters and settlements here:

https://brainly.com/question/9619156


Thanks for stopping by. We are committed to providing the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. We're here to help at Westonci.ca. Keep visiting for the best answers to your questions.