Answered

At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the answers you need, thanks to our active and informed community. Discover precise answers to your questions from a wide range of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.

Why are settlements in places with regular natural disasters controversial?

A. They refuse national rescue services when disasters strike.
B. Insurance costs tend to be lower in these areas.
C. Homes are priced at much higher rates in these areas.
D. Rebuilding is expensive and affects all individuals who pay taxes.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Settlements in disaster-prone areas are controversial due to financial impacts, disparities in recovery efforts, and challenges in incentivizing residents to live in safer zones.


Explanation:

Settlements in places with regular natural disasters are controversial due to various factors such as increased risk, financial impacts, inequalities, and social injustice. For instance, low-income households are often uninsured and struggle to recover financially from disasters, leading to disparities in recovery efforts. Moreover, the tension between creating disincentives for living in high-risk zones and supporting existing residents poses challenges in disaster-prone areas.


Learn more about natural disasters and settlements here:

https://brainly.com/question/9619156


Thanks for using our service. We aim to provide the most accurate answers for all your queries. Visit us again for more insights. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.