Answered

Discover answers to your most pressing questions at Westonci.ca, the ultimate Q&A platform that connects you with expert solutions. Get the answers you need quickly and accurately from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.

Why are settlements in places with regular natural disasters controversial?

A. They refuse national rescue services when disasters strike.
B. Insurance costs tend to be lower in these areas.
C. Homes are priced at much higher rates in these areas.
D. Rebuilding is expensive and affects all individuals who pay taxes.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Settlements in disaster-prone areas are controversial due to financial impacts, disparities in recovery efforts, and challenges in incentivizing residents to live in safer zones.


Explanation:

Settlements in places with regular natural disasters are controversial due to various factors such as increased risk, financial impacts, inequalities, and social injustice. For instance, low-income households are often uninsured and struggle to recover financially from disasters, leading to disparities in recovery efforts. Moreover, the tension between creating disincentives for living in high-risk zones and supporting existing residents poses challenges in disaster-prone areas.


Learn more about natural disasters and settlements here:

https://brainly.com/question/9619156


Visit us again for up-to-date and reliable answers. We're always ready to assist you with your informational needs. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Discover more at Westonci.ca. Return for the latest expert answers and updates on various topics.