Looking for trustworthy answers? Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform where experts share their knowledge on various topics. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.
Sagot :
To determine which statement verifies that [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are inverses of each other, let's go through each option step by step:
1. Option 1: [tex]\( f(g(x)) = x \)[/tex]
This condition alone is necessary but not sufficient to verify that [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are inverses of each other. For [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] to be true inverses, we need to check the relationship in both directions, not just one.
2. Option 2: [tex]\( f(g(x)) = x \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(f(x)) = -x \)[/tex]
This condition cannot be true for demonstrating that [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are inverses. The relationship shows inverse behavior only for [tex]\( f(g(x)) \)[/tex], but changing the sign in [tex]\( g(f(x)) \)[/tex] to [tex]\( -x \)[/tex] disrupts the symmetry required for inverse functions. Inverse functions must map back to the original input, so this cannot be the correct option.
3. Option 3: [tex]\( f(g(x)) = \frac{1}{g(f(x))} \)[/tex]
This condition does not define the inverse relationship. The compositional output [tex]\( f(g(x)) \)[/tex] must return the input [tex]\( x \)[/tex] directly, not a fraction or any other form. This condition likely represents a different functional relationship, but not that of inverse functions.
4. Option 4: [tex]\( f(g(x)) = x \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(f(x)) = x \)[/tex]
This condition is both necessary and sufficient to verify that [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are inverses of each other. For [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] to be true inverses, composing them in either order [tex]\( g(f(x)) \)[/tex] or [tex]\( f(g(x)) \)[/tex] should return the original input [tex]\( x \)[/tex]. This means we must have both:
[tex]\[ f(g(x)) = x \][/tex]
and
[tex]\[ g(f(x)) = x \][/tex]
Hence, the correct statement that verifies [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are inverses of each other is:
[tex]\[ f(g(x)) = x \text{ and } g(f(x)) = x \][/tex]
Therefore, the answer is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{4} \][/tex]
1. Option 1: [tex]\( f(g(x)) = x \)[/tex]
This condition alone is necessary but not sufficient to verify that [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are inverses of each other. For [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] to be true inverses, we need to check the relationship in both directions, not just one.
2. Option 2: [tex]\( f(g(x)) = x \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(f(x)) = -x \)[/tex]
This condition cannot be true for demonstrating that [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are inverses. The relationship shows inverse behavior only for [tex]\( f(g(x)) \)[/tex], but changing the sign in [tex]\( g(f(x)) \)[/tex] to [tex]\( -x \)[/tex] disrupts the symmetry required for inverse functions. Inverse functions must map back to the original input, so this cannot be the correct option.
3. Option 3: [tex]\( f(g(x)) = \frac{1}{g(f(x))} \)[/tex]
This condition does not define the inverse relationship. The compositional output [tex]\( f(g(x)) \)[/tex] must return the input [tex]\( x \)[/tex] directly, not a fraction or any other form. This condition likely represents a different functional relationship, but not that of inverse functions.
4. Option 4: [tex]\( f(g(x)) = x \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(f(x)) = x \)[/tex]
This condition is both necessary and sufficient to verify that [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are inverses of each other. For [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] to be true inverses, composing them in either order [tex]\( g(f(x)) \)[/tex] or [tex]\( f(g(x)) \)[/tex] should return the original input [tex]\( x \)[/tex]. This means we must have both:
[tex]\[ f(g(x)) = x \][/tex]
and
[tex]\[ g(f(x)) = x \][/tex]
Hence, the correct statement that verifies [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are inverses of each other is:
[tex]\[ f(g(x)) = x \text{ and } g(f(x)) = x \][/tex]
Therefore, the answer is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{4} \][/tex]
Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.
