Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform, offering detailed and reliable answers from a knowledgeable community. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our platform. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.
Sagot :
Let's go through the problem step-by-step:
1. The employee works 35 hours per week.
2. The aim is to find an inequality representing the condition for earning more than [tex]$400 per week. 3. We assume the hourly wage of the employee is $[/tex]8.
Firstly, the income from hourly wages can be calculated:
[tex]\[ 35 \text{ hours/week} \times 8 \text{ dollars/hour} = 280 \text{ dollars/week} \][/tex]
Next, we need to account for the weekly sales, represented by [tex]\( x \)[/tex]. The employee earns an additional 8% commission on these sales:
[tex]\[ 0.08x \][/tex]
So, the total weekly earnings, including both the hourly wage and sales commission, is:
[tex]\[ 280 + 0.08x \][/tex]
To find the weekly sales [tex]\( x \)[/tex] required to earn more than [tex]$400 per week, we set up the following inequality: \[ 280 + 0.08x > 400 \] Now, we break it down further: Subtract 280 from both sides to isolate the term with \( x \): \[ 280 + 0.08x - 280 > 400 - 280 \] \[ 0.08x > 120 \] The simplified inequality is: \[ x > 1500 \] Thus, the inequality that represents the condition for the employee to earn more than $[/tex]400 per week is:
[tex]\[ 35(8) + 0.08x > 400 \][/tex]
So, option B is correct:
[tex]\[ 35(8)+0.08 x>400 \][/tex]
1. The employee works 35 hours per week.
2. The aim is to find an inequality representing the condition for earning more than [tex]$400 per week. 3. We assume the hourly wage of the employee is $[/tex]8.
Firstly, the income from hourly wages can be calculated:
[tex]\[ 35 \text{ hours/week} \times 8 \text{ dollars/hour} = 280 \text{ dollars/week} \][/tex]
Next, we need to account for the weekly sales, represented by [tex]\( x \)[/tex]. The employee earns an additional 8% commission on these sales:
[tex]\[ 0.08x \][/tex]
So, the total weekly earnings, including both the hourly wage and sales commission, is:
[tex]\[ 280 + 0.08x \][/tex]
To find the weekly sales [tex]\( x \)[/tex] required to earn more than [tex]$400 per week, we set up the following inequality: \[ 280 + 0.08x > 400 \] Now, we break it down further: Subtract 280 from both sides to isolate the term with \( x \): \[ 280 + 0.08x - 280 > 400 - 280 \] \[ 0.08x > 120 \] The simplified inequality is: \[ x > 1500 \] Thus, the inequality that represents the condition for the employee to earn more than $[/tex]400 per week is:
[tex]\[ 35(8) + 0.08x > 400 \][/tex]
So, option B is correct:
[tex]\[ 35(8)+0.08 x>400 \][/tex]
Thank you for your visit. We are dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. We're here to help at Westonci.ca. Keep visiting for the best answers to your questions.