Welcome to Westonci.ca, your go-to destination for finding answers to all your questions. Join our expert community today! Discover detailed solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.
Sagot :
Let's go through the problem step-by-step:
1. The employee works 35 hours per week.
2. The aim is to find an inequality representing the condition for earning more than [tex]$400 per week. 3. We assume the hourly wage of the employee is $[/tex]8.
Firstly, the income from hourly wages can be calculated:
[tex]\[ 35 \text{ hours/week} \times 8 \text{ dollars/hour} = 280 \text{ dollars/week} \][/tex]
Next, we need to account for the weekly sales, represented by [tex]\( x \)[/tex]. The employee earns an additional 8% commission on these sales:
[tex]\[ 0.08x \][/tex]
So, the total weekly earnings, including both the hourly wage and sales commission, is:
[tex]\[ 280 + 0.08x \][/tex]
To find the weekly sales [tex]\( x \)[/tex] required to earn more than [tex]$400 per week, we set up the following inequality: \[ 280 + 0.08x > 400 \] Now, we break it down further: Subtract 280 from both sides to isolate the term with \( x \): \[ 280 + 0.08x - 280 > 400 - 280 \] \[ 0.08x > 120 \] The simplified inequality is: \[ x > 1500 \] Thus, the inequality that represents the condition for the employee to earn more than $[/tex]400 per week is:
[tex]\[ 35(8) + 0.08x > 400 \][/tex]
So, option B is correct:
[tex]\[ 35(8)+0.08 x>400 \][/tex]
1. The employee works 35 hours per week.
2. The aim is to find an inequality representing the condition for earning more than [tex]$400 per week. 3. We assume the hourly wage of the employee is $[/tex]8.
Firstly, the income from hourly wages can be calculated:
[tex]\[ 35 \text{ hours/week} \times 8 \text{ dollars/hour} = 280 \text{ dollars/week} \][/tex]
Next, we need to account for the weekly sales, represented by [tex]\( x \)[/tex]. The employee earns an additional 8% commission on these sales:
[tex]\[ 0.08x \][/tex]
So, the total weekly earnings, including both the hourly wage and sales commission, is:
[tex]\[ 280 + 0.08x \][/tex]
To find the weekly sales [tex]\( x \)[/tex] required to earn more than [tex]$400 per week, we set up the following inequality: \[ 280 + 0.08x > 400 \] Now, we break it down further: Subtract 280 from both sides to isolate the term with \( x \): \[ 280 + 0.08x - 280 > 400 - 280 \] \[ 0.08x > 120 \] The simplified inequality is: \[ x > 1500 \] Thus, the inequality that represents the condition for the employee to earn more than $[/tex]400 per week is:
[tex]\[ 35(8) + 0.08x > 400 \][/tex]
So, option B is correct:
[tex]\[ 35(8)+0.08 x>400 \][/tex]
Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.