Discover the answers you need at Westonci.ca, a dynamic Q&A platform where knowledge is shared freely by a community of experts. Join our Q&A platform to get precise answers from experts in diverse fields and enhance your understanding. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.
Sagot :
To determine the enthalpy of the reaction using the given enthalpies of formation from the table, we'll follow a systematic process. We'll use the formula for the change in enthalpy (ΔH_reaction):
[tex]\[ \Delta H_{\text {reaction}} = \sum \left( \Delta H_{f, \text {products}} \right) - \sum \left( \Delta H_{f, \text {reactants}} \right) \][/tex]
Let's consider a typical chemical reaction involving the formation of [tex]\( CO_2 \)[/tex] from graphite:
[tex]\[ \text{C (s, graphite)} + \text{O}_2 (\text{g}) \rightarrow \text{CO}_2 (\text{g}) \][/tex]
From the given table:
- ΔH_f for [tex]\(CO_2 (\text{g})\)[/tex] = -285.8 kJ/mol
- ΔH_f for [tex]\(\text{C (s, graphite)}\)[/tex] is missing but usually assumed as 0 kJ/mol (it's a standard state).
For [tex]\(O_2 (\text{g})\)[/tex], ΔH_f = 0 kJ/mol (by convention as a diatomic molecule in its elemental form).
Applying these values to the reaction:
Reactants:
[tex]\[ \Delta H_f (\text{C (s, graphite)}) + \Delta H_f (\text{O}_2 (\text{g})) = 0 + 0 = 0 \text{ kJ/mol} \][/tex]
Products:
[tex]\[ \Delta H_f (\text{CO}_2 (\text{g})) = -285.8 \text{ kJ/mol} \][/tex]
Now, plug these values into the enthalpy change formula:
[tex]\[ \Delta H_{\text{reaction}} = \Delta H_f (\text{products}) - \Delta H_f (\text{reactants}) \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \Delta H_{\text {reaction}} = -285.8 - 0 = -285.8 \text{ kJ/mol} \][/tex]
Thus, the enthalpy of the reaction is:
[tex]\[ -285.8 \text{ kJ/mol} \][/tex]
Even though the given set of answer options doesn't include [tex]\(-285.8 \text{ kJ/mol}\)[/tex] directly, this computed enthalpy value best represents the scenario described in the problem and calculations. If the context of the problem had more details about other reactants/products or specific reactions required to match the given options, then that would need to be revisited. But based on the current information, -285.8 kJ/mol is the enthalpy change, leading me to understand that there might be a mismatch between the option sets provided and the correct answer.
[tex]\[ \Delta H_{\text {reaction}} = \sum \left( \Delta H_{f, \text {products}} \right) - \sum \left( \Delta H_{f, \text {reactants}} \right) \][/tex]
Let's consider a typical chemical reaction involving the formation of [tex]\( CO_2 \)[/tex] from graphite:
[tex]\[ \text{C (s, graphite)} + \text{O}_2 (\text{g}) \rightarrow \text{CO}_2 (\text{g}) \][/tex]
From the given table:
- ΔH_f for [tex]\(CO_2 (\text{g})\)[/tex] = -285.8 kJ/mol
- ΔH_f for [tex]\(\text{C (s, graphite)}\)[/tex] is missing but usually assumed as 0 kJ/mol (it's a standard state).
For [tex]\(O_2 (\text{g})\)[/tex], ΔH_f = 0 kJ/mol (by convention as a diatomic molecule in its elemental form).
Applying these values to the reaction:
Reactants:
[tex]\[ \Delta H_f (\text{C (s, graphite)}) + \Delta H_f (\text{O}_2 (\text{g})) = 0 + 0 = 0 \text{ kJ/mol} \][/tex]
Products:
[tex]\[ \Delta H_f (\text{CO}_2 (\text{g})) = -285.8 \text{ kJ/mol} \][/tex]
Now, plug these values into the enthalpy change formula:
[tex]\[ \Delta H_{\text{reaction}} = \Delta H_f (\text{products}) - \Delta H_f (\text{reactants}) \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \Delta H_{\text {reaction}} = -285.8 - 0 = -285.8 \text{ kJ/mol} \][/tex]
Thus, the enthalpy of the reaction is:
[tex]\[ -285.8 \text{ kJ/mol} \][/tex]
Even though the given set of answer options doesn't include [tex]\(-285.8 \text{ kJ/mol}\)[/tex] directly, this computed enthalpy value best represents the scenario described in the problem and calculations. If the context of the problem had more details about other reactants/products or specific reactions required to match the given options, then that would need to be revisited. But based on the current information, -285.8 kJ/mol is the enthalpy change, leading me to understand that there might be a mismatch between the option sets provided and the correct answer.
Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.