Answered

Westonci.ca is the best place to get answers to your questions, provided by a community of experienced and knowledgeable experts. Experience the ease of finding reliable answers to your questions from a vast community of knowledgeable experts. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.

In the case of the Harlem Nine, the courts decided that New York City was practicing:

A. de jure segregation
B. de facto segregation
C. classism
D. implicit bias

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

De facto segregation stems from neighborhood patterns, contrasting de jure segregation that is based on legal requirements, as seen in the Harlem Nine case.


Explanation:

De facto segregation refers to school segregation stemming from neighborhood residential patterns, while de jure segregation pertains to school segregation stemming from legal requirements. In the case of the Harlem Nine, the courts decided that New York City was practicing de facto segregation by effectively segregating schools based on neighborhood patterns, leading to discriminatorily inferior education in certain areas.


Learn more about segregation in education here:

https://brainly.com/question/42894686


We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.