Answered

Discover answers to your questions with Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A platform that connects you with knowledgeable experts. Our Q&A platform provides quick and trustworthy answers to your questions from experienced professionals in different areas of expertise. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.

In the case of the Harlem Nine, the courts decided that New York City was practicing:

A. de jure segregation
B. de facto segregation
C. classism
D. implicit bias

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

De facto segregation stems from neighborhood patterns, contrasting de jure segregation that is based on legal requirements, as seen in the Harlem Nine case.


Explanation:

De facto segregation refers to school segregation stemming from neighborhood residential patterns, while de jure segregation pertains to school segregation stemming from legal requirements. In the case of the Harlem Nine, the courts decided that New York City was practicing de facto segregation by effectively segregating schools based on neighborhood patterns, leading to discriminatorily inferior education in certain areas.


Learn more about segregation in education here:

https://brainly.com/question/42894686


Thanks for stopping by. We are committed to providing the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Westonci.ca is committed to providing accurate answers. Come back soon for more trustworthy information.