Answered

At Westonci.ca, we connect you with experts who provide detailed answers to your most pressing questions. Start exploring now! Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.

In the case of the Harlem Nine, the courts decided that New York City was practicing:

A. de jure segregation
B. de facto segregation
C. classism
D. implicit bias

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

De facto segregation stems from neighborhood patterns, contrasting de jure segregation that is based on legal requirements, as seen in the Harlem Nine case.


Explanation:

De facto segregation refers to school segregation stemming from neighborhood residential patterns, while de jure segregation pertains to school segregation stemming from legal requirements. In the case of the Harlem Nine, the courts decided that New York City was practicing de facto segregation by effectively segregating schools based on neighborhood patterns, leading to discriminatorily inferior education in certain areas.


Learn more about segregation in education here:

https://brainly.com/question/42894686


Thanks for using our service. We aim to provide the most accurate answers for all your queries. Visit us again for more insights. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca. Stay informed by coming back for more detailed answers.