Westonci.ca is the premier destination for reliable answers to your questions, brought to you by a community of experts. Experience the convenience of getting accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of professionals. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.
Sagot :
Given John's data collection method and findings, let's analyze the given information.
According to the table, the collected opinions of professional sports car drivers for each SUV manufacturer claim are shown:
For Vehicle A:
- 11 drivers agreed with the claim
- 4 drivers disagreed with the claim
For Vehicle B:
- 13 drivers agreed with the claim
- 2 drivers disagreed with the claim
Based on these data points, the majority of the drivers agree with both manufacturers' claims:
- For Vehicle A, [tex]\( \frac{11}{15} \)[/tex] of the drivers agree with the claim. This is approximately 73.3%.
- For Vehicle B, [tex]\( \frac{13}{15} \)[/tex] of the drivers agree with the claim. This is approximately 86.7%.
Since the majority of the drivers agreed with the claims made by both manufacturers, it suggests that both claims are likely valid. Additionally, more drivers agreed with the claim for Vehicle B compared to Vehicle A, indicating that the turning radius of Vehicle B might be perceived as sharper compared to Vehicle A.
Therefore, the best conclusion based on the given data and the majority agreement with the claims is:
C. Both SUV manufacturers' claims are true, but the turning radius of vehicle B is sharper than the turning radius of vehicle A.
According to the table, the collected opinions of professional sports car drivers for each SUV manufacturer claim are shown:
For Vehicle A:
- 11 drivers agreed with the claim
- 4 drivers disagreed with the claim
For Vehicle B:
- 13 drivers agreed with the claim
- 2 drivers disagreed with the claim
Based on these data points, the majority of the drivers agree with both manufacturers' claims:
- For Vehicle A, [tex]\( \frac{11}{15} \)[/tex] of the drivers agree with the claim. This is approximately 73.3%.
- For Vehicle B, [tex]\( \frac{13}{15} \)[/tex] of the drivers agree with the claim. This is approximately 86.7%.
Since the majority of the drivers agreed with the claims made by both manufacturers, it suggests that both claims are likely valid. Additionally, more drivers agreed with the claim for Vehicle B compared to Vehicle A, indicating that the turning radius of Vehicle B might be perceived as sharper compared to Vehicle A.
Therefore, the best conclusion based on the given data and the majority agreement with the claims is:
C. Both SUV manufacturers' claims are true, but the turning radius of vehicle B is sharper than the turning radius of vehicle A.
We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.