Discover a wealth of knowledge at Westonci.ca, where experts provide answers to your most pressing questions. Experience the ease of finding reliable answers to your questions from a vast community of knowledgeable experts. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.
Sagot :
Given John's data collection method and findings, let's analyze the given information.
According to the table, the collected opinions of professional sports car drivers for each SUV manufacturer claim are shown:
For Vehicle A:
- 11 drivers agreed with the claim
- 4 drivers disagreed with the claim
For Vehicle B:
- 13 drivers agreed with the claim
- 2 drivers disagreed with the claim
Based on these data points, the majority of the drivers agree with both manufacturers' claims:
- For Vehicle A, [tex]\( \frac{11}{15} \)[/tex] of the drivers agree with the claim. This is approximately 73.3%.
- For Vehicle B, [tex]\( \frac{13}{15} \)[/tex] of the drivers agree with the claim. This is approximately 86.7%.
Since the majority of the drivers agreed with the claims made by both manufacturers, it suggests that both claims are likely valid. Additionally, more drivers agreed with the claim for Vehicle B compared to Vehicle A, indicating that the turning radius of Vehicle B might be perceived as sharper compared to Vehicle A.
Therefore, the best conclusion based on the given data and the majority agreement with the claims is:
C. Both SUV manufacturers' claims are true, but the turning radius of vehicle B is sharper than the turning radius of vehicle A.
According to the table, the collected opinions of professional sports car drivers for each SUV manufacturer claim are shown:
For Vehicle A:
- 11 drivers agreed with the claim
- 4 drivers disagreed with the claim
For Vehicle B:
- 13 drivers agreed with the claim
- 2 drivers disagreed with the claim
Based on these data points, the majority of the drivers agree with both manufacturers' claims:
- For Vehicle A, [tex]\( \frac{11}{15} \)[/tex] of the drivers agree with the claim. This is approximately 73.3%.
- For Vehicle B, [tex]\( \frac{13}{15} \)[/tex] of the drivers agree with the claim. This is approximately 86.7%.
Since the majority of the drivers agreed with the claims made by both manufacturers, it suggests that both claims are likely valid. Additionally, more drivers agreed with the claim for Vehicle B compared to Vehicle A, indicating that the turning radius of Vehicle B might be perceived as sharper compared to Vehicle A.
Therefore, the best conclusion based on the given data and the majority agreement with the claims is:
C. Both SUV manufacturers' claims are true, but the turning radius of vehicle B is sharper than the turning radius of vehicle A.
We appreciate your time on our site. Don't hesitate to return whenever you have more questions or need further clarification. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. We're here to help at Westonci.ca. Keep visiting for the best answers to your questions.