Welcome to Westonci.ca, the Q&A platform where your questions are met with detailed answers from experienced experts. Discover precise answers to your questions from a wide range of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.
Sagot :
Given John's data collection method and findings, let's analyze the given information.
According to the table, the collected opinions of professional sports car drivers for each SUV manufacturer claim are shown:
For Vehicle A:
- 11 drivers agreed with the claim
- 4 drivers disagreed with the claim
For Vehicle B:
- 13 drivers agreed with the claim
- 2 drivers disagreed with the claim
Based on these data points, the majority of the drivers agree with both manufacturers' claims:
- For Vehicle A, [tex]\( \frac{11}{15} \)[/tex] of the drivers agree with the claim. This is approximately 73.3%.
- For Vehicle B, [tex]\( \frac{13}{15} \)[/tex] of the drivers agree with the claim. This is approximately 86.7%.
Since the majority of the drivers agreed with the claims made by both manufacturers, it suggests that both claims are likely valid. Additionally, more drivers agreed with the claim for Vehicle B compared to Vehicle A, indicating that the turning radius of Vehicle B might be perceived as sharper compared to Vehicle A.
Therefore, the best conclusion based on the given data and the majority agreement with the claims is:
C. Both SUV manufacturers' claims are true, but the turning radius of vehicle B is sharper than the turning radius of vehicle A.
According to the table, the collected opinions of professional sports car drivers for each SUV manufacturer claim are shown:
For Vehicle A:
- 11 drivers agreed with the claim
- 4 drivers disagreed with the claim
For Vehicle B:
- 13 drivers agreed with the claim
- 2 drivers disagreed with the claim
Based on these data points, the majority of the drivers agree with both manufacturers' claims:
- For Vehicle A, [tex]\( \frac{11}{15} \)[/tex] of the drivers agree with the claim. This is approximately 73.3%.
- For Vehicle B, [tex]\( \frac{13}{15} \)[/tex] of the drivers agree with the claim. This is approximately 86.7%.
Since the majority of the drivers agreed with the claims made by both manufacturers, it suggests that both claims are likely valid. Additionally, more drivers agreed with the claim for Vehicle B compared to Vehicle A, indicating that the turning radius of Vehicle B might be perceived as sharper compared to Vehicle A.
Therefore, the best conclusion based on the given data and the majority agreement with the claims is:
C. Both SUV manufacturers' claims are true, but the turning radius of vehicle B is sharper than the turning radius of vehicle A.
We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca. Stay informed by coming back for more detailed answers.